| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We allow value class constructors to be non-public, so to be regular,
we should also allow the same for the param accessor.
This commit uses the 'makeNotPrivate' machinery to ensure that
the backend can generate the requisite unboxing calls.
This commit:
- refactors the code that enforced the restrictions, improving
a few error messages and positions. The remaining restrictions
needed some rewording in light of this change.
- allows value classes to have non-public, val parameters.
private[this] / protected[this] are still disallowed as value
classes don't have a concept of `this`, and because trying to
accomdate then would complicate the implementation.
This means that `class C(x: Int) extends AnyVal` is not allowed,
the user still must write `private val x: Int` or `val x: Int`.
- Outlaw `class C()()(val x: Int) extends AnyVal` to curtail any
bugs that might lurk in such a formulation.
The tests:
- Show that the privacy is respected in the typer phase, under
joint and separate compilation. We don't want a repeat performance
of SI-6601.
- Show that code that needs compiler-generated unboxes works under
both compilation scenarios
- Checks that the remaining restrictions are enforced and well
communicated.
|
