| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Are we in the habit of simply deleting tests when they
become inconvenient? A comment referenced test "0851" as the
example of why the code was needed; the test was deleted
years ago for no reason I can see except that it was not
passing at the time. Words fail me.
Public Service Announcement: tests which are failing are
the MOST USEFUL tests. DON'T DELETE THEM!
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Moved disabled tests back into their original place. Expect 7 tests to
fail.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Not sure why the disabled test did not get committed last time.
|
|
|
fixed #842, #945, #83, #996, #1016, + some performace tuning.
|
