| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If the test names can be believed, this covers
SI-294 SI-1751 SI-1782 SI-2318 SI-3897
SI-4649 SI-4786 SI-5293 SI-5399 SI-5418
SI-5606 SI-5610 SI-5639
Most of these were moved to pending in 1729b26500
due to failures of unknown cause. It was suggested
they be brought back "as soon as possible" and that
was three months ago; I suppose it's now possible.
If they need to be disabled again, please move them
to test/disabled, not to test/pending. "disabled"
should mean a formerly passing test in limbo; "pending"
tests document bugs which await fixing.
I also removed some dead files in test/ - the
files with a "cmds" extension are from a failed
experiment and do not do anything.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I have this sneaky suspicion that part of these spurious failures
are caused by the recent partest optimizations.
@axel22 already checked that compiler instances are not shared between test runs.
However, except for the benchmark test, they all have a distinct
race condition in symbol loading/type checking feel to them.
Since, in the end, the tests and/or their corresponding fixes are as likely
a culprit as the test framework, moving them out of the way until their owners
can get them back in line and they stop throwing primate wenches into our build.
We should bring them back as soon as possible, though.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Old Man Reflection is coming home and he's not going to like finding
out a bunch of beans have moved into his reflecting room. We had better
evict those guys before he blows his stack.
scala.reflect.*Bean* --> scala.beans.*
scala.beans, that's kind of a fancy package name for some beans. I
figure it's time to start fishing or cutting bait on this kind of thing.
I don't even know what beans are, but if we're going to have them in the
mainline, the least surprising place to find them is scala.beans. If we
don't want to put them in scala.beans for whatever reason, then I say
they don't belong in trunk at all.
Bonus round:
scala.annotation.target --> scala.beans.meta
I don't know if there is any more unfortunate name for a package
possible than "target". Maybe ".svn" or ".git" if you could have dots
in package names. Package CVS wouldn't hit too hard these days. Package
lib_managed? I'll try to come up with something. In any case this golden
opportunity could not be squandered.
There is a new starr included, because GenJVM contains all kinds of
shooting-from-the-hip Bean-related name hardcoding. (Yes, still. I ran
out of stones. So a few birds escape with their lives... this time.)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
[no content change] Fixed all SVN properties: mimes, EOL, executable. Id
expansion is consistently enabled for Scala/Java/C# sources in 'src/'
and consistently disabled and removed from everywhere else: there should
not be any dead Id tags anymore.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|
|
fixed BeanProperty, added BooleanBeanProperty, added many tests (#1029,
#1751, #294, #1942, #1782, #1788, #637).
|
