|
|
- Discovered in 2.10.2-RC1
- Ostensibly regressed in 7e52fb910b, which conceptually reverted
part of 0cde930b so that (mutable) TypeVars don't use structural equality.
- But, does *not* fail if 7e52fb910b is cherry-picked directly after 0cde930b,
suggesting that it shone a light on a behaviour change in some other commit
in between the two.
- Indeed, the true regression came in https://github.com/scala/scala/commit/e5da30b843#L5L3176
- A targeted revert of e5da30b843 is undesirable, as we'd like SI-6846 to stay fixed
What's happening here? In the enclosed test case, higher kinded type
inference explores two possibilities:
Composed.this.Split[A]
K[[T]A[B[T]]] // `Split[A]` dealiased
The difference in the flow of type inference can be seen from the diff
below. Notice how now we no longer register `?K.addBound(Composed.this.Split)`,
we instead only register `?K.addBound(K)`
```patch
--- sandbox/old.log 2013-05-30 00:27:34.000000000 +0200
+++ sandbox/new.log 2013-05-30 00:28:28.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,55 +1,114 @@
?K.unifyFull(Composed.this.Split[A])
?K.unifySpecific(Composed.this.Split[A])
- ?K.addBound(Composed.this.Split)
?B.unifyFull(T)
?B.unifySpecific(T)
`-> false
?B.unifyFull(Any)
?B.unifySpecific(Any)
`-> false
`-> false
?K.unifySpecific(L[[T]A[B[T]]])
- ?K.addBound(L)
?B.unifyFull(B[T])
?B.unifySpecific(B[T])
?B.addBound(B)
`-> true
?B.unifyFull(B[T])
?B.unifySpecific(B[T])
?B.addBound(B)
`-> true
?B.unifyFull(B[T])
?B.unifySpecific(B[T])
?B.addBound(B)
`-> true
?B.unifyFull(B[T])
?B.unifySpecific(B[T])
?B.addBound(B)
`-> true
+ ?K.addBound(L)
`-> true
?K.unifyFull(Composed.this.Split[A])
?K.unifySpecific(Composed.this.Split[A])
- ?K.addBound(Composed.this.Split)
?B.unifyFull(x)
?B.unifySpecific(x)
`-> false
`-> false
?K.unifySpecific(L[[T]A[B[T]]])
+ ?B.unifyFull(B[T])
+ ?B.unifySpecific(B[T])
+ ?B.addBound(B)
+ `-> true
+ ?B.unifyFull(B[T])
+ ?B.unifySpecific(B[T])
+ ?B.addBound(B)
+ `-> true
+ ?B.unifyFull(B[T])
+ ?B.unifySpecific(B[T])
+ ?B.addBound(B)
+ `-> true
+ ?B.unifyFull(B[T])
+ ?B.unifySpecific(B[T])
+ ?B.addBound(B)
+ `-> true
?K.addBound(L)
+ `-> true
+?K.unifyFull(Composed.this.Split[A])
+ ?K.unifySpecific(Composed.this.Split[A])
+ ?B.unifyFull(T)
+ ?B.unifySpecific(T)
+ `-> false
+ ?B.unifyFull(Any)
+ ?B.unifySpecific(Any)
+ `-> false
+ `-> false
+ ?K.unifySpecific(L[[T]A[B[T]]])
?B.unifyFull(B[T])
?B.unifySpecific(B[T])
?B.addBound(B)
`-> true
?B.unifyFull(B[T])
?B.unifySpecific(B[T])
?B.addBound(B)
`-> true
?B.unifyFull(B[T])
?B.unifySpecific(B[T])
?B.addBound(B)
`-> true
?B.unifyFull(B[T])
?B.unifySpecific(B[T])
?B.addBound(B)
`-> true
+ ?K.addBound(L)
+ `-> true
+?K.unifyFull(Composed.this.Split[A])
+ ?K.unifySpecific(Composed.this.Split[A])
+ ?B.unifyFull(x)
+ ?B.unifySpecific(x)
+ `-> false
+ `-> false
+ ?K.unifySpecific(L[[T]A[B[T]]])
+ ?B.unifyFull(B[T])
+ ?B.unifySpecific(B[T])
+ ?B.addBound(B)
+ `-> true
+ ?B.unifyFull(B[T])
+ ?B.unifySpecific(B[T])
+ ?B.addBound(B)
+ `-> true
+ ?B.unifyFull(B[T])
+ ?B.unifySpecific(B[T])
+ ?B.addBound(B)
+ `-> true
+ ?B.unifyFull(B[T])
+ ?B.unifySpecific(B[T])
+ ?B.addBound(B)
+ `-> true
+ ?K.addBound(L)
+ `-> true
+?K.unifyFull(L[A])
+ ?K.unifySpecific(L[A])
+ ?K.addBound(L)
+ `-> true
+?K.unifyFull(L[A])
+ ?K.unifySpecific(L[A])
+ ?K.addBound(L)
`-> true
```
|
