| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Add operations like map, flatMap which assume right-bias
- Deprecate {Left,Right}Projection
- Deprecate left and right in favor of swap
- Add contains, toOption, toTry, toSeq and filterOrElse
- toSeq returns collection.immutable.Seq instead of collection.Seq
- Don't add get
There are no incompatible changes.
The only possibility of breakage that exists is when people have added
extension methods named map, flatMap etc. to Either in the past doing
something different than the methods added to Either now.
One detail that moved the scales in favor of deprecating LeftProjection
and RightProjection was the desire to have toSeq return
scala.collection.immutable.Seq instead of scala.collection.Seq
like LeftProjection and RightProjection do.
Therefore keeping LeftProjection and RightProjection would introduce
inconsistency.
filter is called filterOrElse because filtering in a for-comprehension
doesn't work if the method needs an explicit argument.
contains was added as safer alternative to
if (either.isRight && either.right.get == $something) ...
While adding filter with an implicit zero value is possible, it's
dangerous as it would require that developers add a "naked" implicit
value of type A to their scope and it would close the door to a future
in which the Scala standard library ships with Monoid and filter could
exist with an implicit Monoid parameter.
|
| |
|
|
| |
see https://github.com/scala/scala-dev/issues/72 for details
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I imagine these date back to old Subversion days and are probably the
result of inadvertent commits from Windows users with vcs client
configs.
having the bit set isn't really harmful most of the time,
but it's just not right, and it makes the files stand out in directory
listings for no reason
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 8986ee4fd56c53d563165d992185c6c532f35790.
Scaladoc seems to work reliably for 2.11.x. We are using it in the IDE builds and haven't noticed any
flakiness, so we'd like to get reinstate this test.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Francois is investigating the root cause as part of his
work on stabilizing Scaladoc preview in the IDE.
The test seems to only fail on the windows nightly build.
I suspect this is due to a slower or loaded machine.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
for given fragments. Don't type-check when forcing doc comments, but rather
do it directly. Test the new functionality as well as better tests for
the old one.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Refactor scaladoc base functionality to allow it to be mixed in with Global in the IDE.
|
| |
|
