summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/files/presentation/ide-bug-1000531.check
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Java 6-8 agnosticism for a testJason Zaugg2014-06-041-99/+12
| | | | | | | | Under Java 8, the output contains newly added methods in j.u.Iterator. I've created cut down, test-local versions of the relevant types to decouple.
* SI-7475 findMember and findMembers: estranged no moreJason Zaugg2014-02-101-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Swathes of important logic are duplicated between `findMember` and `findMembers` after they separated on grounds of irreconcilable differences about how fast they should run: d905558 Variation #10 to optimze findMember fcb0c01 Attempt #9 to opimize findMember. 71d2ceb Attempt #8 to opimize findMember. 77e5692 Attempty #7 to optimize findMember 275115e Fixing problem that caused fingerprints to fail in e94252e Attemmpt #6 to optimize findMember 73e61b8 Attempt #5 to optimize findMember. 04f0b65 Attempt #4 to optimize findMember 0e3c70f Attempt #3 to optimize findMember 41f4497 Attempt #2 to optimize findMember 1a73aa0 Attempt #1 to optimize findMember This didn't actually bear fruit, and the intervening years have seen the implementations drift. Now is the time to reunite them under the banner of `FindMemberBase`. Each has a separate subclass to customise the behaviour. This is primarily used by `findMember` to cache member types and to assemble the resulting list of symbols in an low-allocation manner. While there I have introduced some polymorphic calls, the call sites are only bi-morphic, and our typical pattern of compilation involves far more `findMember` calls, so I expect that JIT will keep the virtual call cost to an absolute minimum. Test results have been updated now that `findMembers` correctly excludes constructors and doesn't inherit privates. Coming up next: we can actually fix SI-7475!
* SI-8129 Make Object#== override Any#==Jason Zaugg2014-02-101-3/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | And the same for != If we tried to declare these signatures in non-fictional classes, we would be chastised about collapsing into the "same signature after erasure". This will have an influence of typing, as the typechecking of arguments is sensitive to overloading: if multiple variants are feasible, the argument will be typechecked with a wildcard expected type. So people inspecting the types of the arguments to `==` before this change might have seen an interesting type for `if (true) x else y`, but now the `If` will have type `Any`, as we don't need to calculate the LUB. I've left a TODO to note that we should really make `Any#{==, !=}` non-final and include a final override in `AnyVal`. But I don't think that is particularly urgent.
* Test infrastructure for scope completionJason Zaugg2013-11-151-1/+1
| | | | | Adds a new marker /*_*/ to trigger scope completion test. Original type completion test oracles update for the tweaked output
* Make parameters to implicit value classes privateJason Zaugg2013-11-121-5/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | So that they aren't offered as an autocomplete suggestion: implicit class Shouty(string: String) extends AnyVal { def SHOUT_! = string.toUpperCase + "!" } "". // autocompletion offers `.string` here The original incarnation of value classes didn't allow this sort of encapsulation, so we either invented goofy names like `__thingToAdd` or just picked `x` or `self`. But SI-7859 has delivered us the freedom to keep the accessor private. Should we keep any of these accessors around in a deprecated form? The implicit classes in Predef were added in 2.11.0-M2 (c26a8db067e4f), so they are okay. I think we can make reason that these APIs were both accidental and unlikely to be interpreted as public, so we can break them immediately. scala> Left(1).x res0: scala.util.Either[Int,Int] = Left(1) scala> import concurrent.duration._ import concurrent.duration._ scala> 1.n res1: Int = 1
* An attempt to make tests deterministic.Paul Phillips2013-05-191-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | The nondeterminism presently showing itself in presentation/implicit-member is a consequence of the presentation compiler tests relying on details of the behavior of toString calls. We need to stomp this out, but it will take a while. Based on the check file changes enclosed with this commit, this will suffice for the presentation compiler tests. A broader assault will have to take place, but not yet.
* More useful checkfile output in interactive tests.Paul Phillips2013-04-301-122/+122
| | | | | | I resisted the urge to fix "aksTypeCompletion" for as long as I possibly could. While I was there I threw in what seem to be like significant output improvements, but you tell me.
* Maintenance of Predef.Paul Phillips2013-02-121-1/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1) Deprecates much of Predef and scala.Console, especially: - the read* methods (see below) - the set{Out,Err,In} methods (see SI-4793) 2) Removed long-deprecated: - Predef#exit - Predef#error should have gone, but could not due to sbt At least the whole source base has now been future-proofed against the eventual removal of Predef#error. The low justification for the read* methods should be readily apparent: they are little used and have no call to be in global namespace, especially given their weird ad hoc semantics and unreasonably tempting names such as readBoolean(). 3) Segregated the deprecated elements in Predef from the part which still thrives. 4) Converted all the standard Predef implicits into implicit classes, value classes where possible: - ArrowAssoc, Ensuring, StringFormat, StringAdd, RichException (value) - SeqCharSequence, ArrayCharSequence (non-value) Non-implicit deprecated stubs prop up the names of the formerly converting methods.
* SI-6811 Remove primitive widenings and /:\Simon Ochsenreither2013-01-171-3/+1
|
* SI-6467: Zero element in aggregate now by-nameAleksandar Prokopec2012-10-041-1/+1
|
* Renaming convertTo to to on GenTraversableOnce.Josh Suereth2012-06-281-1/+1
|
* Migrate build to @odersky's suggestion of convertTo.Josh Suereth2012-06-181-1/+3
| | | | | | * Move method into TraversableOnce from Iterator and Traversable to make the build pass. * Udpate IDE tests with new collection methods. * Rewire default toXYZ methods to use convertTo.
* removes array tagsEugene Burmako2012-06-081-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Before 2.10 we had a notion of ClassManifest that could be used to retain erasures of abstract types (type parameters, abstract type members) for being used at runtime. With the advent of ClassManifest (and its subtype Manifest) it became possible to write: def mkGenericArray[T: Manifest] = Array[T]() When compiling array instantiation, scalac would use a ClassManifest implicit parameter from scope (in this case, provided by a context bound) to remember Ts that have been passed to invoke mkGenericArray and use that information to instantiate arrays at runtime (via Java reflection). When redesigning manifests into what is now known as type tags, we decided to explore a notion of ArrayTags that would stand for abstract and pure array creators. Sure, ClassManifests were perfectly fine for this job, but they did too much - technically speaking, one doesn't necessarily need a java.lang.Class to create an array. Depending on a platform, e.g. within JavaScript runtime, one would want to use a different mechanism. As tempting as this idea was, it has also proven to be problematic. First, it created an extra abstraction inside the compiler. Along with class tags and type tags, we had a third flavor of tags - array tags. This has threaded the additional complexity though implicits and typers. Second, consequently, when redesigning tags multiple times over the course of Scala 2.10.0 development, we had to carry this extra abstraction with us, which exacerbated the overall feeling towards array tags. Finally, array tags didn't fit into the naming scheme we had for tags. Both class tags and type tags sound logical, because, they are descriptors for the things they are supposed to tag, according to their names. However array tags are the odd ones, because they don't actually tag any arrays. As funny as it might sound, the naming problem was the last straw that made us do away with the array tags. Hence this commit.
* repairs the tests after the refactoring spreeEugene Burmako2012-06-081-1/+1
|
* A whole bunch of checkfile updates.Paul Phillips2012-05-101-3/+3
| | | | | Wasn't me this time (I don't think!) Mr. Robot can't get here too soon for me.
* What did you bring me Santa?Paul Phillips2012-05-051-1/+2
| | | | Oh boy, a checkfile! This is the best christmas ever!
* Presentation Compiler tests for visibility of members.Iulian Dragos2012-04-301-119/+119
| | | | Removed some unneeded indirection in the testing framework.
* migrates stdlib and compiler to tagsEugene Burmako2012-04-231-1/+1
| | | | | * all usages of ClassManifest and Manifest are replaced with tags * all manifest tests are replaced with tag tests
* Updated checkfile with IndexedSeq signature.Paul Phillips2012-01-111-1/+1
|
* Updates for the ten tests I broke recently.Paul Phillips2011-11-081-1/+2
| | | | | Wow, ten tests, that's unexpected. No review.
* Third collections commit from Todd Vierling.Paul Phillips2011-11-071-6/+6
| | | | | | | Misc cleanups associated with the previous commits: limiting overly expanded types, fixing externally visible types for scaladoc, utilizing abstract collection classes where possible, etc.
* Fixed failing pc tests. no reviewHubert Plociniczak2011-10-311-2/+3
|
* Selective dealiasing when printing errors.Paul Phillips2011-10-031-9/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | *** Important note for busy commit log skimmers *** Symbol method "fullName" has been trying to serve the dual role of "how to print a symbol" and "how to find a class file." It cannot serve both these roles simultaneously, primarily because of package objects but other little things as well. Since in the majority of situations we want the one which corresponds to the idealized scala world, not the grubby bytecode, I went with that for fullName. When you require the path to a class (e.g. you are calling Class.forName) you should use javaClassName. package foo { package object bar { class Bippy } } If sym is Bippy's symbol, then sym.fullName == foo.bar.Bippy sym.javaClassName == foo.bar.package.Bippy *** End important note *** There are many situations where we (until now) forewent revealing everything we knew about a type mismatch. For instance, this isn't very helpful of scalac (at least in those more common cases where you didn't define type X on the previous repl line.) scala> type X = Int defined type alias X scala> def f(x: X): Byte = x <console>:8: error: type mismatch; found : X required: Byte def f(x: X): Byte = x ^ Now it says: found : X (which expands to) Int required: Byte def f(x: X): Byte = x ^ In addition I rearchitected a number of methods involving: - finding a symbol's owner - calculating a symbol's name - determining whether to print a prefix No review.
* fixed svn props and presentation check filesmichelou2011-08-191-1/+1
|
* Major rewrite of the testing infrastructure for...Micro Dotta2011-08-171-0/+124
Major rewrite of the testing infrastructure for the presentation compiler. Added several new tests that will be part of the nightly build. Once the move to SBT is completed I will look into how to extract the test infrastructure (as it should really not be living in the compiler codebase). Review by dragos