| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
One step towards teasing apart the mixin phase, making
each phase that adds members to traits responsible for
mixing in those members into subclasses of said traits.
Another design tenet is to not emit symbols or trees
only to later remove them. Therefore, we model a
val in a trait as its accessor. The underlying field
is an implementation detail. It must be mixed into
subclasses, but has no business in a trait (an interface).
Also trying to reduce tree creation by changing less in subtrees
during tree transforms.
A lot of nice fixes fall out from this rework:
- Correct bridges and more precise generic signatures for
mixed in accessors, since they are now created before erasure.
- Correct enclosing method attribute for classes nested in trait fields.
Trait fields are now created as MethodSymbol (no longer TermSymbol).
This symbol shows up in the `originalOwner` chain of a class declared
within the field initializer. This promoted the field getter to
being the enclosing method of the nested class, which it is not
(the EnclosingMethod attribute is a source-level property).
- Signature inference is now more similar between vals and defs
- No more field for constant-typed vals, or mixed in accessors
for subclasses. A constant val can be fully implemented in a trait.
TODO:
- give same treatment to trait lazy vals (only accessors, no fields)
- remove support for presuper vals in traits
(they don't have the right init semantics in traits anyway)
- lambdalift should emit accessors for captured vals in traits,
not a field
Assorted notes from the full git history before squashing below.
Unit-typed vals: don't suppress field
it affects the memory model -- even a write of unit to a field is relevant...
unit-typed lazy vals should never receive a field
this need was unmasked by test/files/run/t7843-jsr223-service.scala,
which no longer printed the output expected from the `0 to 10 foreach`
Use getter.referenced to track traitsetter
reify's toolbox compiler changes the name of the trait
that owns the accessor between fields and constructors (`$` suffix),
so that the trait setter cannot be found when doing mkAssign in constructors
this could be solved by creating the mkAssign tree immediately during fields
anyway, first experiment: use `referenced` now that fields runs closer
to the constructors phase (I tried this before and something broke)
Infer result type for `val`s, like we do for `def`s
The lack of result type inference caused pos/t6780 to fail
in the new field encoding for traits, as there is no separate accessor,
and method synthesis computes the type signature based on the ValDef tree.
This caused a cyclic error in implicit search, because now the
implicit val's result type was not inferred from the super member,
and inferring it from the RHS would cause implicit search to consider
the member in question, so that a cycle is detected and type checking fails...
Regardless of the new encoding, we should consistently infer result types
for `def`s and `val`s.
Removed test/files/run/t4287inferredMethodTypes.scala and test/files/presentation/t4287c,
since they were relying on inferring argument types from "overridden" constructors
in a test for range positions of default arguments. Constructors don't override,
so that was a mis-feature of -Yinfer-argument-types.
Had to slightly refactor test/files/presentation/doc, as it was relying
on scalac inferring a big intersection type to approximate the anonymous
class that's instantiated for `override lazy val analyzer`.
Now that we infer `Global` as the expected type based on the overridden val,
we make `getComment` private in navigating between good old Skylla and Charybdis.
I'm not sure why we need this restriction for anonymous classes though;
only structural calls are restricted in the way that we're trying to avoid.
The old behavior is maintained nder -Xsource:2.11.
Tests:
- test/files/{pos,neg}/val_infer.scala
- test/files/neg/val_sig_infer_match.scala
- test/files/neg/val_sig_infer_struct.scala
need NMT when inferring sig for accessor
Q: why are we calling valDefSig and not methodSig?
A: traits use defs for vals, but still use valDefSig...
keep accessor and field info in synch
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It turns out `findMembers` has been a bit sloppy in recent
years and has returned private members from *anywhere* up the
base class sequence. Access checks usually pick up the slack
and eliminate the unwanted privates.
But, in concert with the "concrete beats abstract" rule in
`findMember`, the following mishap appeared:
scala> :paste
// Entering paste mode (ctrl-D to finish)
trait T { def a: Int }
trait B { private def a: Int = 0 }
trait C extends T with B { a }
// Exiting paste mode, now interpreting.
<console>:9: error: method a in trait B cannot be accessed in C
trait C extends T with B { a }
^
I noticed this when compiling Akka against JDK 8; a new private method
in the bowels of the JDK was enough to break the build!
It turns out that some finesse in needed to interpret SLS 5.2:
> The private modifier can be used with any definition or declaration
> in a template. They are not inherited by subclasses [...]
So, can we simply exclude privates from all but the first base class?
No, as that might be a refinement class! The following must be
allowed:
trait A { private def foo = 0; trait T { self: A => this.foo } }
This commit:
- tracks when the walk up the base class sequence passes the
first non-refinement class, and excludes private members
- ... except, if we are at a direct parent of a refinement
class itself
- Makes a corresponding change to OverridingPairs, to only consider
private members if they are owned by the `base` Symbol under
consideration. We don't need to deal with the subtleties of
refinements there as that code is only used for bona-fide classes.
- replaces use of `hasTransOwner` when considering whether a
private[this] symbol is a member.
The last condition was not grounded in the spec at all. The change
is visible in cases like:
// Old
scala> trait A { private[this] val x = 0; class B extends A { this.x } }
<console>:7: error: value x in trait A cannot be accessed in A.this.B
trait A { private[this] val x = 0; class B extends A { this.x } }
^
// New
scala> trait A { private[this] val x = 0; class B extends A { this.x } }
<console>:8: error: value x is not a member of A.this.B
trait A { private[this] val x = 0; class B extends A { this.x } }
^
Furthermore, we no longer give a `private[this]` member a free pass
if it is sourced from the very first base class.
trait Cake extends Slice {
private[this] val bippy = ()
}
trait Slice { self: Cake =>
bippy // BCS: Cake, Slice, AnyRef, Any
}
The different handling between `private` and `private[this]`
still seems a bit dubious.
The spec says:
> An different form of qualification is private[this]. A member M
> marked with this modifier can be accessed only from within the
> object in which it is defined. That is, a selection p.M is only
> legal if the prefix is this or O.this, for some class O enclosing
> the reference. In addition, the restrictions for unqualified
> private apply.
This sounds like a question of access, not membership. If so, we
should admit `private[this]` members from parents of refined types
in `FindMember`.
AFAICT, not too much rests on the distinction: do we get a
"no such member", or "member foo inaccessible" error? I welcome
scrutinee of the checkfile of `neg/t7475f.scala` to help put
this last piece into the puzzle.
One more thing: findMember does not have *any* code the corresponds
to the last sentence of:
> SLS 5.2 The modifier can be qualified with an identifier C
> (e.g. private[C]) that must denote a class or package enclosing
> the definition. Members labeled with such a modifier are accessible
> respectively only from code inside the package C or only from code
> inside the class C and its companion module (ยง5.4).
> Such members are also inherited only from templates inside C.
When I showed Martin this, he suggested it was an error in the
spec, and we should leave the access checking to callers of
that inherited qualified-private member.
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
bincompat-forward.whitelist.conf
src/interactive/scala/tools/nsc/interactive/Global.scala
test/files/presentation/scope-completion-2.check
test/files/presentation/scope-completion-3.check
test/files/presentation/scope-completion-import.check
Conflicts in the scope completion tests handled with the help
of @skyluc in https://github.com/scala/scala/pull/3264
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Imported member vals and vars were always marked inaccessible, even
if referencing them at the location of the completion is valid in code.
The accessible flag is now set accordingly to the accessibility of the getter.
|
| |
|
|
| |
(cherry picked from commit 3d55fe723f1af91f4d2db421f0e0965c583346dc)
|
| |
|
