| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Are we in the habit of simply deleting tests when they
become inconvenient? A comment referenced test "0851" as the
example of why the code was needed; the test was deleted
years ago for no reason I can see except that it was not
passing at the time. Words fail me.
Public Service Announcement: tests which are failing are
the MOST USEFUL tests. DON'T DELETE THEM!
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Moved disabled tests back into their original place. Expect 7 tests to
fail.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixed deepToString to put spaces after commas
(like regular Array toString, and List, etc.).
Fixed all the test cases depending on this.
Fixed the interpreter to keep my mind from wandering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixing the build (toString() issues in the compiler) and the test suite
(toString() issues, spacing issues, and some stringPrefix issues)
|
| |
|
|
added Array.deepEquals, improved external links to sources in API doc
|