| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
One last flurry with the broom before I leave you slobs to code
in your own filth. Eliminated all the trailing whitespace I
could manage, with special prejudice reserved for the test cases
which depended on the preservation of trailing whitespace.
Was reminded I cannot figure out how to eliminate the trailing
space on the "scala> " prompt in repl transcripts. At least
reduced the number of such empty prompts by trimming transcript
code on the way in.
Routed ConsoleReporter's "printMessage" through a trailing
whitespace stripping method which might help futureproof
against the future of whitespace diseases. Deleted the up-to-40
lines of trailing whitespace found in various library files.
It seems like only yesterday we performed whitespace surgery
on the whole repo. Clearly it doesn't stick very well. I suggest
it would work better to enforce a few requirements on the way in.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
While we are all aware of the issues around Serialization,
I think in this case it is perfectly sound and safe to make
List serializable:
- List is not an interface, it is the base type of an ADT.
Common behavior of its members should be reflected in the base type.
- List is sealed, there is no chance of an user providing a new
non-serializable subtype of List.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
After a great struggle, I realized that the major reason that
code like this still doesn't compile:
List(Stream(), List())
is that we were poisoning the computed lub in mergePrefixAndArgs by
throwing in Any when the max recursion depth was reached. I modified
it to return NoType instead, which allowed me to teach lublist to
recognize what has happened and fall back to a weaker type, one
which does not contain recursive bounds. This enables the lubbing
process to complete. The most elusive lub, defeated. Notice also
that the refinement members are correctly parameterized on Nothing,
rather than on Any as has often been the case.
scala> List(Stream(), List())
res0: List[scala.collection.immutable.LinearSeq[Nothing] with scala.collection.AbstractSeq[Nothing]{def companion: scala.collection.generic.GenericCompanion[scala.collection.immutable.LinearSeq with scala.collection.AbstractSeq]; def reverse: scala.collection.immutable.LinearSeq[Nothing] with scala.collection.AbstractSeq[Nothing]{def companion: scala.collection.generic.GenericCompanion[scala.collection.immutable.LinearSeq with scala.collection.AbstractSeq]; def reverse: scala.collection.immutable.LinearSeq[Nothing] with scala.collection.AbstractSeq[Nothing]{def reverse: scala.collection.immutable.LinearSeq[Nothing] with scala.collection.AbstractSeq[Nothing]; def dropRight(n: Int): scala.collection.immutable.LinearSeq[Nothing] with scala.collection.AbstractSeq[Nothing]; def takeRight(n: ...
|
|
|
Has to be somewhere more directly tied to structural
refinements. See run/lub-visibility.scala before/after
output for motivation. Closes SI-5534.
|
