summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/files/run/macro-range
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* some renamingsEugene Burmako2014-02-151-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | It’s almost 1am, so I’m only scratching the surface, mechanistically applying the renames that I’ve written down in my notebook: * typeSignature => info * declarations => decls * nme/tpnme => termNames/typeNames * paramss => paramLists * allOverriddenSymbols => overrides Some explanation is in order so that I don’t get crucified :) 1) No information loss happens when abbreviating `typeSignature` and `declarations`. We already have contractions in a number of our public APIs (e.g. `typeParams`), and I think it’s fine to shorten words as long as people can understand the shortened versions without a background in scalac. 2) I agree with Simon that `nme` and `tpnme` are cryptic. I think it would be thoughtful of us to provide newcomers with better names. To offset the increase in mouthfulness, I’ve moved `MethodSymbol.isConstructor` to `Symbol.isConstructor`, which covers the most popular use case for nme’s. 3) I also agree that putting `paramss` is a lot to ask of our users. The double-“s” convention is very neat, but let’s admit that it’s just weird for the newcomers. I think `paramLists` is a good compromise here. 4) `allOverriddenSymbols` is my personal complaint. I think it’s a mouthful and a shorter name would be a much better fit for the public API.
* establishes scala.reflect.api#internalEugene Burmako2014-02-141-1/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Reflection API exhibits a tension inherent to experimental things: on the one hand we want it to grow into a beautiful and robust API, but on the other hand we have to deal with immaturity of underlying mechanisms by providing not very pretty solutions to enable important use cases. In Scala 2.10, which was our first stab at reflection API, we didn't have a systematic approach to dealing with this tension, sometimes exposing too much of internals (e.g. Symbol.deSkolemize) and sometimes exposing too little (e.g. there's still no facility to change owners, to do typing transformations, etc). This resulted in certain confusion with some internal APIs living among public ones, scaring the newcomers, and some internal APIs only available via casting, which requires intimate knowledge of the compiler and breaks compatibility guarantees. This led to creation of the `internal` API module for the reflection API, which provides advanced APIs necessary for macros that push boundaries of the state of the art, clearly demarcating them from the more or less straightforward rest and providing compatibility guarantees on par with the rest of the reflection API. This commit does break source compatibility with reflection API in 2.10, but the next commit is going to introduce a strategy of dealing with that.
* *boxContext => *box.Context , *boxMacro => *box.MacroEugene Burmako2014-01-122-4/+4
| | | | | | | | | | Performs the following renamings: * scala.reflect.macros.BlackboxContext to scala.reflect.macros.blackbox.Context * scala.reflect.macros.BlackboxMacro to scala.reflect.macros.blackbox.Macro * scala.reflect.macros.WhiteboxContext to scala.reflect.macros.whitebox.Context * scala.reflect.macros.WhiteboxMacro to scala.reflect.macros.whitebox.Macro https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/scala-internals/MX40-dM28rk
* blackbox and whitebox macrosEugene Burmako2013-11-122-4/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This is the first commit in the series. This commit only: 1) Splits Context into BlackboxContext and WhiteboxContext 2) Splits Macro into BlackboxMacro and WhiteboxMacro 3) Introduces the isBundle property in the macro impl binding Here we just teach the compiler that macros can now be blackbox and whitebox, without actually imposing any restrictions on blackbox macros. These restrictions will come in subsequent commits. For description and documentation of the blackbox/whitebox separation see the official macro guide at the scaladoc website: http://docs.scala-lang.org/overviews/macros/blackbox-whitebox.html Some infrastructure work to make evolving macros easier: compile partest-extras with quick so they can use latest library/reflect/...
* Changes reflection tests to use shorter name constructorsDen Shabalin2012-12-252-6/+6
|
* evicts last traces of makro from our codebaseEugene Burmako2012-08-022-2/+2
| | | | Removes the stubs left out to appease the old starr, fixes macro tests.
* repairs the tests after the refactoring spreeEugene Burmako2012-06-082-7/+6
|
* removes Expr <-> Tree implicitsEugene Burmako2012-04-251-5/+5
|
* Next generation of macrosEugene Burmako2012-04-125-198/+108
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Implements SIP 16: Self-cleaning macros: http://bit.ly/wjjXTZ Features: * Macro defs * Reification * Type tags * Manifests aliased to type tags * Extended reflection API * Several hundred tests * 1111 changed files Not yet implemented: * Reification of refined types * Expr.value splicing * Named and default macro expansions * Intricacies of interaction between macros and implicits * Emission of debug information for macros (compliant with JSR-45) Dedicated to Yuri Alekseyevich Gagarin
* Temporarily disabling debug traces in macro testsEugene Burmako2012-01-232-12/+22
|
* Progress with macrosEugene Burmako2012-01-202-0/+188
A short recap: * Macro expansion now works finely for instance macro invocations * Macros are now hidden behind -Xmacros * Bodies of macros now have "import _context._" in their preamble * Macros are now loaded from classpath, much like regular libraries * Macros can now override methods (in that case macro expansion does not crash if macro is not found, it just falls back to super) Review by @odersky.