| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closing the REPL with Ctrl+D does not issue a newline, so the user's
prompt displays on the same line as the `scala>` prompt. This is bad.
We now force a newline before closing the interpreter, and display
`:quit` while we're at it so that people know how to exit the REPL
(since `exit` doesn't exist anymore).
The tricky part was to only add a newline when the console is
interrupted, and *not* when it is closed by a command (like `:quit`),
since commands are processed after their text (including newline) has
been sent to the console.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
One last flurry with the broom before I leave you slobs to code
in your own filth. Eliminated all the trailing whitespace I
could manage, with special prejudice reserved for the test cases
which depended on the preservation of trailing whitespace.
Was reminded I cannot figure out how to eliminate the trailing
space on the "scala> " prompt in repl transcripts. At least
reduced the number of such empty prompts by trimming transcript
code on the way in.
Routed ConsoleReporter's "printMessage" through a trailing
whitespace stripping method which might help futureproof
against the future of whitespace diseases. Deleted the up-to-40
lines of trailing whitespace found in various library files.
It seems like only yesterday we performed whitespace surgery
on the whole repo. Clearly it doesn't stick very well. I suggest
it would work better to enforce a few requirements on the way in.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This brings all the files into line with the .gitattributes
settings, which should henceforth be automatically maintained
by git.
|
|
|
Our name mangling scheme w.r.t stuff nested into objects conflicts
with JVM's ideas of beauty, which messes up getDeclaredClasses.
Scala reflection needs getDeclaredClasses to convert between Scala and Java,
so the situation looked grim. Greg suggested a workaround described in:
https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-4023?focusedCommentId=54759#comment-54759.
Luckily the workaround worked!
|
