| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |\
| |
| | |
Another reflection bomb
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
We definitely need to document scala.reflect.runtime.universe,
therefore adding scala.reflect.runtime to skipPackages was a mistake.
But then we need to make a bunch of internal classes private to reflect
or to scala. Not very pretty, but it works.
|
| |/
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This matter was discussed at scala-internals:
http://groups.google.com/group/scala-internals/browse_thread/thread/6414d200cf31c357
And I am convinced with Paul's argument: consistency of the convention
is very important.
|
|
|
mirrors now carry a class tag of the receiver, so that they can detect
value classes being reflected upon and adjust accordingly (e.g. allow
Int_+ for ints, but disallow it for Integers).
Surprisingly enough derived value classes (SIP-15 guys that inherit from AnyVal)
have been working all along, so no modification were required to fix them.
|
