summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/files/run/t7617a
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* *boxContext => *box.Context , *boxMacro => *box.MacroEugene Burmako2014-01-121-3/+3
| | | | | | | | | | Performs the following renamings: * scala.reflect.macros.BlackboxContext to scala.reflect.macros.blackbox.Context * scala.reflect.macros.BlackboxMacro to scala.reflect.macros.blackbox.Macro * scala.reflect.macros.WhiteboxContext to scala.reflect.macros.whitebox.Context * scala.reflect.macros.WhiteboxMacro to scala.reflect.macros.whitebox.Macro https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/scala-internals/MX40-dM28rk
* blackbox and whitebox macrosEugene Burmako2013-11-121-3/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This is the first commit in the series. This commit only: 1) Splits Context into BlackboxContext and WhiteboxContext 2) Splits Macro into BlackboxMacro and WhiteboxMacro 3) Introduces the isBundle property in the macro impl binding Here we just teach the compiler that macros can now be blackbox and whitebox, without actually imposing any restrictions on blackbox macros. These restrictions will come in subsequent commits. For description and documentation of the blackbox/whitebox separation see the official macro guide at the scaladoc website: http://docs.scala-lang.org/overviews/macros/blackbox-whitebox.html Some infrastructure work to make evolving macros easier: compile partest-extras with quick so they can use latest library/reflect/...
* SI-7617 typedAssign no longer expands lhsEugene Burmako2013-07-092-0/+27
This makes sure that setter and updateDynamic macros work as intended rather than in some cases expanding incorrectly or prematurely. Setter invocations are desugared from assignments of values to getters. If a typecheck of an assignment's lhs yields an invocation of a getter, then the assignment is rewritten into an invocation of a setter. However if a getter is a macro, then it just expands, destroying the prerequisite for desugaring. Therefore we need to disable expansion for the typecheck of an lhs. Similar thing happens to updateDynamic that first desugars a getter invocation into q"$target.updateDynamic($fieldName)" and then expects typedAssign to rewrite the corresponding Assign node into an additional application of a partially applied updateDynamic to a rhs. Here we also need to disable the typecheck of an lhs, because macros cannot be partially applied.