summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/files/run/t8395.scala
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* SI-8395 Regression in pattern matching with nested bindsJason Zaugg2014-03-121-0/+9
Regressed in https://github.com/scala/scala/pull/2848. In particular, see 0cf47bdb5b and 017460e63c. Because of the regression, this pattern: (s @ (_s @ (_: String))) was translated into `typeTestStep`, rather than a `bindingStep`. This came down the the use of `unbind` in the `TypeBound` extractor. My first step was to remove the `unbind`. That led to another problem: the tree now matches `SymbolAndTypeBound`, which extracted `symbol = s, tpe = String`, ignoring the `_s`. I changed that extractor to no longer recursively apply to the sub-pattern tree, which is what `MaybeTypedBound` used to do. I also checked for other uses of `unbind` in the match translation. The only place I found it is in `BoundTree#pt`. I believe that this usage is correct, or at least, not obviously incorrect.