summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/files/run/t9003.scala
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* SI-9003 Eagerly capture more potentially mutable bindersJason Zaugg2014-11-261-0/+71
This is a re-run of SI-5158 in two different contexts. As reported, the result of `unapply[Seq]` under name based pattern matching might not guarantee stability of results of calls to `_1`, `apply(i)`, etc, so we call these eagerly, and call them once only. I also found a case in regular pattern matching that we hadn't accounted for: extracting elements of sequences (either from a case class or from an `unapplySeq`) may also be unstable. This commit changes `ExtractorTreeMaker` to force storage of such binders, even under `-optimize`. This parallels the change to `ProductExtractorTreeMaker` in 8ebe8e3e8. I have added a special case for traditional `unapply` methods returning `Option`. This avoids a change for: ``` % cat test/files/run/t9003b.scala object Single { def unapply(a: Any) = Some("") } object Test { def main(args: Array[String]): Unit = { "" match { case Single(x) => (x, x) } } } % qscalac -optimize -Xprint:patmat test/files/run/t9003b.scala 2>&1 | grep --context=5 get case <synthetic> val x1: Any = ""; case5(){ <synthetic> val o7: Some[String] = Single.unapply(x1); if (o7.isEmpty.unary_!) matchEnd4({ scala.Tuple2.apply[String, String](o7.get, o7.get); () }) else case6() }; % scalac-hash v2.11.4 -optimize -Xprint:patmat test/files/run/t9003b.scala 2>&1 | grep --context=5 get case <synthetic> val x1: Any = ""; case5(){ <synthetic> val o7: Some[String] = Single.unapply(x1); if (o7.isEmpty.unary_!) matchEnd4({ scala.Tuple2.apply[String, String](o7.get, o7.get); () }) else case6() }; ```