| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| * | virtpatmat on by default; chicken out: -Xoldpatmat | Adriaan Moors | 2012-04-14 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | | | | | | | | some tests (unreachability, exhaustivity, @switch annotation checking) are still run under -Xoldpatmat, but that will change before we go into RC mode (then the test/ partest of this commit will be reverted) removed irrelevant dependency on patmat | ||||
| * | [vpm] TODO note: make unapply type list stricter | Adriaan Moors | 2012-03-20 | 1 | -0/+1 |
| when an unapply returns Option[T] where T is some ProductN, does that mean the unapply returns 1 result, i.e., that T, or did it mean to return N results? to disambiguate, falling back to stricter spec-adherence, which requires T be exactly TupleN for N results for now, allow extractor result to be any product, not just tuple | |||||
 |
index : scala | |
| The Scala programming language |
| summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff |