Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
* | Disabled generation of _1, _2, etc. methods. | Paul Phillips | 2012-10-22 | 1 | -2/+5 |
| | | | | | | | This was part of the introduction of ProductN, which had to go back into pandora's box because of issues with cycles during typing. These should have been reverted along with it. | ||||
* | [vpm] TODO note: make unapply type list stricter | Adriaan Moors | 2012-03-20 | 1 | -0/+11 |
when an unapply returns Option[T] where T is some ProductN, does that mean the unapply returns 1 result, i.e., that T, or did it mean to return N results? to disambiguate, falling back to stricter spec-adherence, which requires T be exactly TupleN for N results for now, allow extractor result to be any product, not just tuple |