| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit fixes the behavior of ClassTag's Any-accepting unapply
overload. Previously, ClassTag had overloads of unapply that accepted
all of the Java primitive aliases (language-supported magic classes
extending AnyVal), as well as an implementation that accepted an Any.
All of the AnyVal-accepting (more specific) versions of the methods
worked correctly. However, the Any-accepting version incorrectly handled
these types. For example, ClassTag.Int.unapply(3) would return Some(3)
(through the Int-accepting overload), while ClassTag.Int.unapply(3: Any)
would return None (through the Any-accepting overload). This commit
unifies these behaviors, making ClassTag.Int.unapply(3: Any) return
Some(3). It accomplishes this by adding a pattern match on the type of
that method's argument, which will delegate to one of the
more-specifically-typed overloads if possible. It also improves the
formatting of the code a bit.
One thing to note (though I doubt anyone will ever do this based on this
message) is that the AnyVal-subtype-accepting overloads should be
removed in Scala 2.12, as they are unneeded. I placed a note to this
effect into the code.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This brings all the files into line with the .gitattributes
settings, which should henceforth be automatically maintained
by git.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also introduces an important change to Manifest.Nothing and Manifest.Null.
Previously their `erasure` was equal to classOf[Object]. Now it's correctly
set to classOf[scala.runtime.Nothing$] and classOf[scala.runtime.Null$]
correspondingly.
See a discussion here:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/scala-internals/Y0ALGo7QPqE
|
|
|
the pattern `(_: T)` is made checkable using (ct: ClassTag[T]).unapply
by rewriting it to `ct(_: T)` (if there's a ClassTag[T] available)
similarly for extractors: if the formal type of the unapply method
is an uncheckable type, wrap in the corresponding classtag extractor (if available)
don't trigger rewrite on non-toplevel unchecked types
(i.e., only look at type constructor part of T when looking for unchecked types)
TODO: find outer match to figure out if we're supposed to be unchecked
would like to give users a chance to opt-out from the wrapping,
but finding the match to which this pattern belongs turned out to be tricky...
|
