summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/files/run
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
...
* | | | | Fix for SI-4729, overriding java varargs in scala.Paul Phillips2012-09-293-0/+37
|/ / / / | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This was a bad interaction between anonymous subclasses and bridge methods. new Foo { override def bar = 5 } Scala figures it can mark "bar" private since hey, what's the difference. The problem is that if it was overriding a java-defined varargs method in scala, the bridge method logic says "Oh, it's private? Then you don't need a varargs bridge." Hey scalac, you're the one that made me private! You made me like this! You!
* | | | Merge branch '2.10.x' into 210-mergePaul Phillips2012-09-2815-46/+58
|\| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * 2.10.x: (37 commits) Added logic and tests for unchecked refinements. Moved isNonRefinementClassType somewhere logical. Moved two tests to less breaky locations. Nailed down the "impossible match" logic. Finish docs for string interpolation. moves Context.ParseError outside the cake revives macros.Infrastructure moves Context.runtimeUniverse to TreeBuild.mkRuntimeUniverseRef a more precise type for Context.mirror gets rid of macros.Infrastructure simplifies Context.Run and Context.CompilationUnit exposes Position.source as SourceFile removes extraneous stuff from macros.Infrastructure merges macros.CapturedVariables into macros.Universe merges macros.Exprs and macros.TypeTags into Context removes front ends from scala-reflect.jar PositionApi => Position hides BuildUtils from Scaladoc MirrorOf => Mirror docs.pre-lib now checks for mods in reflect ... Conflicts: test/files/neg/t4302.check test/files/neg/unchecked.check test/files/neg/unchecked2.check
| * | | Merge pull request #1399 from paulp/210-uncheckedGrzegorz Kossakowski2012-09-281-5/+5
| |\ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | Much better unchecked warnings.
| | * | | Improvements to unchecked warnings.Paul Phillips2012-09-251-5/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Closes SI-6275, SI-5762. The comment says is better than I can. /** On pattern matcher checkability: * * Consider a pattern match of this form: (x: X) match { case _: P => } * * There are four possibilities to consider: * [P1] X will always conform to P * [P2] x will never conform to P * [P3] X <: P if some runtime test is true * [P4] X cannot be checked against P * * The first two cases correspond to those when there is enough static * information to say X <: P or that !(X <: P) for all X and P. * The fourth case includes unknown abstract types or structural * refinements appearing within a pattern. * * The third case is the interesting one. We designate another type, XR, * which is essentially the intersection of X and |P|, where |P| is * the erasure of P. If XR <: P, then no warning is emitted. * * Examples of how this info is put to use: * sealed trait A[T] ; class B[T] extends A[T] * def f(x: B[Int]) = x match { case _: A[Int] if true => } * def g(x: A[Int]) = x match { case _: B[Int] => } * * `f` requires no warning because X=B[Int], P=A[Int], and B[Int] <:< A[Int]. * `g` requires no warning because X=A[Int], P=B[Int], XR=B[Int], and B[Int] <:< B[Int]. * XR=B[Int] because a value of type A[Int] which is tested to be a B can * only be a B[Int], due to the definition of B (B[T] extends A[T].) * * This is something like asSeenFrom, only rather than asking what a type looks * like from the point of view of one of its base classes, we ask what it looks * like from the point of view of one of its subclasses. */
| * | | | moves Context.runtimeUniverse to TreeBuild.mkRuntimeUniverseRefEugene Burmako2012-09-273-4/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Scaladoc-driven cleanup for the win
| * | | | simplifies Context.Run and Context.CompilationUnitEugene Burmako2012-09-271-2/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | By turning them from abstract types into full-fledged traits implemented by our internal Run and CompilationUnit.
| * | | | exposes Position.source as SourceFileEugene Burmako2012-09-272-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | It was useful to pretend that SourceFile isn't a part of the API, when it's physical location was in scala-compiler.jar. Afterwards Position and SourceFile have been moved to scala-reflect.jar, and (what's more important) scala-reflect.jar gained experimental status, meaning that we're not bound by backward compatibility in 2.10.0. Therefore I'd say we should expose a full-fledged SourceFile in Position.source (just as we do for Symbol.associatedFile) and later find out how to strip down its interface to something suitable for public consumption.
| * | | | removes extraneous stuff from macros.InfrastructureEugene Burmako2012-09-271-12/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | libraryClassLoader can be derived from currentClassPath currentMacro can be trivially derived from macroApplication Backend-detection methods forXXX (as in forJVM or forScaladoc) might be useful, but current design of this API is not future-proof. I'm not able to come up with a better design on the spot, so let's remove this functionality for the moment.
| * | | | removes front ends from scala-reflect.jarEugene Burmako2012-09-273-13/+34
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | It was an interesting idea to give macro developers control over front ends, but it hasn't given any visible results. To the contrast, front ends have proven useful for toolboxes to easily control what errors get printed where. Therefore I'm moving front ends to scala-compiler.jar to clean up the API. Yay for scaladoc-driven development!
| * | | | MirrorOf => MirrorEugene Burmako2012-09-274-8/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The name looks weird in the scaladoc overview panel, so I decided to do a last-minute rename.
* | | | | Merge 2.10.x into master to fix breaking tests and keep things up-to-date.Josh Suereth2012-09-2724-16/+382
|\| | | |
| * | | | Merge pull request #1393 from scalamacros/topic/leaks-in-toolboxesGrzegorz Kossakowski2012-09-271-0/+26
| |\ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | SI-6412 alleviates leaks in toolboxes, attempt #2
| | * | | | SI-6412 alleviates leaks in toolboxes, attempt #2Eugene Burmako2012-09-271-0/+26
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Turns importer caches into fully weak hash maps, and also applies manual cleanup to toolboxes every time they are used. It's not enough, because reflection-mem-typecheck test is still leaking at a rate of ~100kb per typecheck, but it's much better than it was before. We'll fix the rest later, after 2.10.0-final. For more information, see https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-6412 and http://groups.google.com/group/scala-internals/browse_thread/thread/eabcf3d406dab8b2 In comparison with https://github.com/scala/scala/commit/b403c1d, the original commit that implemented the fix, this one doesn't crash tests. The problem with the original commit was that it called tryFixup() before updating the cache, leading to stack overflows.
| * | | | | hardens DirectTest against missing -d settingsEugene Burmako2012-09-261-1/+1
| |/ / / / | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | And also explicitly specifies -d in a test where I forgot to do that. Double checking never hurts.
| * | | | Merge pull request #1380 from scalamacros/ticket/6277Eugene Burmako2012-09-2612-15/+19
| |\ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | SI-6277 fix for isXXX methods in reflection
| | * | | | SI-6277 fixes flags, annotations & privateWithinEugene Burmako2012-09-2612-15/+19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | `Symbol.getFlag`, 'Symbol.hasFlag`, `Symbol.hasAllFlags`, `Symbol.annotations` and `Symbol.privateWithin` now trigger automatic initialization of symbols if they are used in a runtime reflection universe and some other conditions are met (see `Symbol.needsInitialize` for details). As the performance testing in https://github.com/scala/scala/pull/1380 shows, this commit introduces a ~2% performance regression of compilation speed. Unfortunately all known solutions to the bug at hand (A, B & C - all of those) introduce perf regressions (see the pull request linked above for details). However we're under severe time pressure, so there's no more time to explore. Therefore I suggest this is reasonable to accept this performance hit, because we've just gained 6% from removing scala.reflect.base, and even before that we were well within our performance goal for 2.10.0-final.
| * | | | | Merge pull request #1396 from axel22/issue/6410Josh Suereth2012-09-262-0/+11
| |\ \ \ \ \ | | |_|/ / / | |/| | | | SI-6410 add test cases.
| | * | | | SI-6410 add test cases.Aleksandar Prokopec2012-09-252-0/+11
| | | | | |
| * | | | | Update check-file for SI-6344 test.Grzegorz Kossakowski2012-09-251-2/+2
| |/ / / / | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | There were some changes to value classes since pull request was tested so outdated check-file got merged. Paul confirmed that those changes are going in the right direction so all it requires is to update the check file. Review by @paulp.
| * | | | Merge pull request #1345 from paulp/issue/6344Grzegorz Kossakowski2012-09-252-0/+238
| |\ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | Possible fix for SI-6344, value class generic signatures.
| | * | | | Fix for SI-6344, value class generic signatures.Paul Phillips2012-09-202-0/+238
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Value classes mostly erase to the erasure of the underlying type. Not everything in the checkfile looks correct, but I know from experience I can spend the rest of my life poking at erasures, so let's try to book some progress.
| * | | | | Revert "SI-6412 alleviates leaks in toolboxes"Grzegorz Kossakowski2012-09-251-26/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This reverts commit b403c1d7524ccdfc3455b5bc5d5363fdd9c82bec.
| * | | | | SI-6412 alleviates leaks in toolboxesEugene Burmako2012-09-241-0/+26
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Turns importer caches into fully weak hash maps, and also applies manual cleanup to toolboxes every time they are used. It's not enough, because reflection-mem-typecheck test is still leaking at a rate of ~100kb per typecheck, but it's much better than it was before. We'll fix the rest later, after 2.10.0-final. For more information, see https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-6412 and http://groups.google.com/group/scala-internals/browse_thread/thread/eabcf3d406dab8b2
| * | | | | SI-6412 fixes leaks in Types.uniquesEugene Burmako2012-09-242-0/+30
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This is the most blatant leak in reflection. There are others, but their impact is much smaller, therefore we'll fix them later, after 2.10.0-final. For more information, see https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-6412 and http://groups.google.com/group/scala-internals/browse_thread/thread/eabcf3d406dab8b2
| * | | | | Merge pull request #1378 from scalamacros/ticket/5918Eugene Burmako2012-09-232-0/+47
| |\ \ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SI-5918 fixes the ConstantType ugliness
| | * | | | | SI-5918 fixes the ConstantType uglinessEugene Burmako2012-09-232-0/+47
| | | |/ / / | | |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Java enum values are represented with constants wrapping corresponding Symbols. To find out the underlying type of such a constant one needs to calculate sym.owner.linkedClassOfClass.tpe (where sym represents the wrapped symbol). To quote the source code, given (in java): class A { enum E { VAL1 } } - sym: the symbol of the actual enumeration value (VAL1) - .owner: the ModuleClassSymbol of the enumeration (object E) - .linkedClassOfClass: the ClassSymbol of the enumeration (class E) Back then, as far as I can guess, linkedClassOfClass was flaky and didn't work well late in the compilation pipeline. Therefore a fix to SI-1329 introduced a caching facility. Once a ConstantType representing the type of Constant(sym) was created (I guess, during typer, when linkedClassOfClass was still working), it cached the underlying type and used it in subsequent phases. *** Unfortunately this solution, being fine for enum values, broke another flavor of constants - type wrapping constants that represent classOf (for example, Constant(IntTpe) represents the classOf[Int] constant). Type-wrapping constants are special, because their type (e.g. Class[Int] in the example from the previous paragraph) changes as the compilation progresses. Before erasure it's Class[something], and after erasure it's just Class. Therefore caching types of such constants might lead to incorrect types flying around after erasure, as described in this scala-internals thread: http://groups.google.com/group/scala-internals/browse_thread/thread/45185b341aeb6a30. *** Now when the problem is clear, the question is why didn't it happen before? That's all because of another peculiarity of the compiler. Before erasure package references (e.g. in TypeRef prefixes) are represented as ThisType(sym), where sym stands for a package class symbol. After erasure such references are represented differently, e.g. java.lang package looks like TypeRef(TypeRef(TypeRef(NoPrefix, root, Nil), java, Nil), java.lang, Nil). As described in the aforementioned thread, the incorrect caching strategy employed in UniqueConstantType mixed with other caching mechanisms in compiler effectively established a non-clearable cache that goes from Type instances to types that represent their classOfs, e.g. from String to Class[String]. So if anyone tried to typecheck a classOf after erasure, he/she would get Class[String] instead of the correct Class, and compiler would crash. Right? Nope. Before erasure String is TypeRef(ThisType(java.lang), StringSymbol, Nil), and after erasure it's TypeRef(TypeRef(...), StringSymbol, Nil), as explained above. Therefore the foul cache would contain two String types: one pre-erasure going to a pre-erasure Class[String], and another one post-erasure going to a post-erasure Class. *** This shaky balance was broken when I tried to implement class tag generation with shiny Type.erasure method that Martin just exposed in the reflection API. The erasure method partially invoked the Erasure phase, and for a String it returned its post-erasure representation (with java.lang prefix represented as TypeRef, not as ThisType). And after that I used the result of erasure to build a classOf for a class tag. Since I did it in a macro, it was typer, a pre-erasure phase. Now you understand why things broke. That classOf created a Constant wrapping a post-erasure representation of String, which cached the incorrect non-erased Class[String] type for a post-erasure type, and things exploded. You can imagine my panic! The ScalaDays deadline was near, I still had to do finishing touches to implicit macros (which I actually never had time to do), and such a fundamental thing exploded. Actually I figured out the hashing problem, but in the limited time I had I failed to understand why exactly it's happening, so I introduced the dirty workaround praised in SI-5918 and moved on. *** The story doesn't end here. Some time has passed, and I learned a lot about the compiler. I independently discovered the ThisType -> TypeRef transform that erasure applies to package references and patched Type.erasure to undo it. After all, Type.erasure is a user-facing API, and users don't need to know about post-typer implementation details. You can read more about this here: http://groups.google.com/group/scala-internals/browse_thread/thread/6d3277ae21b6d581 From what we've learned above, we can see that this Type.erasure fix made the UniqueConstantType workaround unnecessary. But I didn't know that. So imagine my surprise when I tried to remove that workaround and ran the tests only to see that nothing fails. I went back in time to April when the problem first manifested, extracted a minimized crasher and tried to use it on trunk. Again, nothing crashed. And only with the help of showRaw, I finally understood that types printed as "String" can be wildly different. The rest was a piece of cake. *** The irony is that the original reason for ConstantType caching is no longer valid. linkedClassOfClass now works fine (and files/jvm/outerEnum.scala agrees with me), so we can remove the cache altogether. So why all this story about erasure and package references? Well, I don't know. I enjoyed uncovering this mystery, so I wanted to share it with you :)
| * | | | | Merge pull request #1379 from retronym/topic/boxing-conversionsPaul Phillips2012-09-222-0/+10
| |\ \ \ \ \ | | |/ / / / | |/| | | | Remove BoxingConversions from the scala package.
| | * | | | Remove BoxingConversions from the scala package.Jason Zaugg2012-09-222-0/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | And add it to two test cases that rely on it. It is a remnant of the now-removed FlatArray (8cc7de74d).
| * | | | | A couple CRLF normalization stragglers.Paul Phillips2012-09-213-7/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Now sorely needed since files with CRLF endings but an LF attribute which are checked into the repo will aggressively cause dirty git status on unix.
* | | | | | Fixed SI-5604, selections on package objects.Paul Phillips2012-09-262-0/+58
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | mkAttributedSelect, which creates a Select tree based on a symbol, has been a major source of package object bugs, because it has not been accurately identifying selections on package objects. When selecting foo.bar, if foo turns out to be a package object, the created Select tree must be foo.`package`.bar However mkAttributedSelect was only examining the owner of the symbol, which means it would work if the package object defined bar directly, but not if it inherited it.
* | | | | | Merge pull request #1367 from retronym/ticket/6381Grzegorz Kossakowski2012-09-212-0/+30
|\ \ \ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SI-6381 Honour -Yrangepos in the REPL
| * | | | | | SI-6381 Honour -Yrangepos in the REPLJason Zaugg2012-09-202-0/+30
| | | | | | |
* | | | | | | Merge branch '2.10.x'Paul Phillips2012-09-20278-1854/+2132
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ | |/ / / / / / |/| / / / / / | |/ / / / / | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * 2.10.x: (36 commits) Normalized line endings. New .gitattributes file. Disabled failing build manager tests. New test case for SI-6337 New test case for closing SI-6385 Value classes: eliminated half-boxing Cleanup of OverridingPairs Fixes SI-6260 Use faster download URL now that artifactory is fixed. don't try to create tags w/o scala-reflect.jar some small remaining fixes SI-5943 toolboxes now autoimport Predef and scala Fix for loud test. SI-6363 deploys the updated starr SI-6363 removes scala.reflect.base SI-6392 wraps non-terms before typecheck/eval SI-6394 fixes macros.Context.enclosingClass Error message improvement for SI-6336. Adjustments to scala.concurrent.duration. prepping for the refactoring ... Conflicts: src/actors-migration/scala/actors/Pattern.scala src/compiler/scala/tools/nsc/Global.scala src/compiler/scala/tools/nsc/transform/Erasure.scala src/compiler/scala/tools/nsc/typechecker/Typers.scala src/library/scala/collection/immutable/Vector.scala test/files/jvm/actmig-PinS_1.scala test/files/jvm/actmig-PinS_2.scala test/files/jvm/actmig-PinS_3.scala test/files/jvm/actmig-public-methods_1.scala
| * | | | | Merge remote-tracking branch 'paulp/topic/gitattributes' into 2.10.xPaul Phillips2012-09-20246-1927/+1927
| |\ \ \ \ \ | | |/ / / / | |/| | | |
| | * | | | Normalized line endings.Paul Phillips2012-09-20246-1927/+1927
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This brings all the files into line with the .gitattributes settings, which should henceforth be automatically maintained by git.
| * | | | | Merge pull request #1348 from scalamacros/ticket/6394Grzegorz Kossakowski2012-09-204-0/+18
| |\ \ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SI-6394 fixes macros.Context.enclosingClass
| | * | | | | SI-6394 fixes macros.Context.enclosingClassEugene Burmako2012-09-194-0/+18
| | | |_|/ / | | |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Previously I used typer.context.enclClass, but it seems to do something completely unexpected, so I switched to manual context traversal.
| * | | | | Merge pull request #1360 from scalamacros/hotfix/sbtEugene Burmako2012-09-206-0/+126
| |\ \ \ \ \ | | |_|/ / / | |/| | | | don't try to create tags w/o scala-reflect.jar
| | * | | | don't try to create tags w/o scala-reflect.jarEugene Burmako2012-09-206-0/+126
| | | |/ / | | |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Since recently type tags have relocated to scala-reflect.jar, meaning that they are no longer always on library classpath. In the compiler we do have code that generates type tags, and this code is bound to fail if scala-reflect.jar isn't there. I though this wouldn't be a problem, because type tag materialization is only going to be triggered by users explicitly requesting a type tag. That's generally true, but I overlooked a corner case. Since we provide manifest <-> type tag compatibility, manifest lookup can sometimes trigger tag lookup, which might result in tag synthesis, which blows up like this: http://groups.google.com/group/scala-internals/browse_thread/thread/166ce4b71b7c46bb This commit also ensures that type tag generation/interop doesnt sneak into the code of the libraries that don't have scala-reflect.jar on their classpath. For details refer to the discussion at scala-internals: http://groups.google.com/group/scala-internals/browse_thread/thread/72f6ce3010f4d8
| * | | | New test case for SI-6337Martin Odersky2012-09-201-0/+16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This test case shows that the variant in the comment of SI-6337 now compiles also.
| * | | | Value classes: eliminated half-boxingMartin Odersky2012-09-204-4/+36
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We now apply erasure of value classes everywhere. previously, erasure was disabled in the value class itself. This led to irregegularities and bugs. See test run/valueclasses-pavlov.scala for something that led to a ClassCastException before.
| * | | | Fixes SI-6260Martin Odersky2012-09-202-0/+13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Guards against bridge methods that clash with other methods. Two tests: The neg test is the original ticket. The run test tweaks things slightly so that the generated bridge method does not clash, and tests that the necessary unboxings are indeed performed at runtime.
| * | | | Merge pull request #1331 from scalamacros/ticket/5943Grzegorz Kossakowski2012-09-204-0/+20
| |\ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | SI-5943 toolboxes now autoimport Predef and scala
| | * | | | SI-5943 toolboxes now autoimport Predef and scalaEugene Burmako2012-09-204-0/+20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Previously tb.typeCheck used default typer, which builds upon NoContext. Changing the context to analyzer.rootContext(NoCompilationUnit, EmptyTree) fixed the missing imports problem. Unfortunately this doesn't help in cases like "math.sqrt(4.0)" because of https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-6393. But anyways I'm adding this test case to pending.
| * | | | | Merge pull request #1338 from scalamacros/ticket/5418Grzegorz Kossakowski2012-09-204-0/+17
| |\ \ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | existentially typed macro expansions now work fine
| | * | | | | test case closes SI-5418Eugene Burmako2012-09-182-0/+13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Now, when the existential reification bug is fixed, I've been able to take a look at SI-5418, and, apparently, the problem with importers has fixed itself during these 9 months of the bug being active.
| | * | | | | existentially typed expansions now work fineEugene Burmako2012-09-182-0/+4
| | |/ / / / | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If one tries to compile the following code with the parent of this commit: ru.reify(new Object().getClass) then the following error will occur: Test.scala:2: error: type mismatch; found : $u.Expr[Class[_ <: Object]] required: reflect.runtime.universe.Expr[Class[?0(in value <local Test>)]] where type ?0(in value <local Test>) <: Object ru.reify(new Object().getClass) ^ This happens because macro expansions are always typechecked against the return type of their macro definitions instantiated in the context of expandee. In this case the expected type contains skolems which are incompatible with wildcards in the type of the expansion. I tried all the incantations I could think of - without any success. Luckily I met Martin who pointed me at the same problem solved in adapt (see the diff w.r.t Typers.scala).
| * | | | | Merge pull request #1358 from scalamacros/ticket/6392Grzegorz Kossakowski2012-09-204-0/+20
| |\ \ \ \ \ | | |_|/ / / | |/| | | | SI-6392 wraps non-terms before typecheck/eval
| | * | | | SI-6392 wraps non-terms before typecheck/evalEugene Burmako2012-09-194-0/+20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Wrap non-term arguments of typecheck and eval, so that toolboxes can work with full-fledged files (except for package declarations).
| * | | | | SI-6363 removes scala.reflect.baseEugene Burmako2012-09-1913-102/+100
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | As the experience has shown, there's no need for a separate layer of reflection in scala-library.jar. Therefore I'm putting an end to it.