summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/files/scalacheck/list.scala
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Cull extraneous whitespace.Paul Phillips2013-09-181-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | One last flurry with the broom before I leave you slobs to code in your own filth. Eliminated all the trailing whitespace I could manage, with special prejudice reserved for the test cases which depended on the preservation of trailing whitespace. Was reminded I cannot figure out how to eliminate the trailing space on the "scala> " prompt in repl transcripts. At least reduced the number of such empty prompts by trimming transcript code on the way in. Routed ConsoleReporter's "printMessage" through a trailing whitespace stripping method which might help futureproof against the future of whitespace diseases. Deleted the up-to-40 lines of trailing whitespace found in various library files. It seems like only yesterday we performed whitespace surgery on the whole repo. Clearly it doesn't stick very well. I suggest it would work better to enforce a few requirements on the way in.
* Begone t1737...Hubert Plociniczak2011-11-021-1/+1
|
* An issue with scalacheck and actors where an ex...Aleksandar Pokopec2010-10-051-1/+1
| | | | | An issue with scalacheck and actors where an excess of thread pools gets created - tmp fix. No review.
* Cleaning up the contents of test.Paul Phillips2010-09-281-0/+21
| | | | | | | | | | | including "CheckEither", written against scalacheck 1.2 in the year 471 AD. Removed all the duplicates I could find, mostly between pending and files. Renamed a bunch of tests so they wouldn't look like likely duplicates next time around. Nominated somebody else to do this once in a while. No review.
* Disabled scalacheck tests because they interfer...Martin Odersky2010-05-101-21/+0
| | | | | | Disabled scalacheck tests because they interfere with library refactorings (refactorings break scalacheck).
* Unique's seeming victory is overruled by commit...Paul Phillips2010-02-041-2/+2
| | | | | | Unique's seeming victory is overruled by committee. It is "distinct", not "unique", wherein lies the nub. No review.
* Striking while the iron is hot, renamed removeD...Paul Phillips2010-02-031-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | Striking while the iron is hot, renamed removeDuplicates to unique and deprecated removeDuplicates. The debate between distinct and unique was vigorous but unique won by a freckle. (Dark horse 'nub' was disqualified for taking performance enhancers.) The only thing which might need review is the choice of name, but review by odersky.
* Added some more scalacheck tests to list, incid...Paul Phillips2009-09-161-1/+15
| | | | | | | Added some more scalacheck tests to list, incidentally inspiring millions of commit log readers to say out loud "hey, I could be writing tests like those!"
* The first working scalacheck test! Now Arbitrar...Paul Phillips2009-09-161-0/+7
| | | | | | The first working scalacheck test! Now Arbitrary is working for us instead of our nemesis Capt. Entropy.
* massive new collections checkin.Martin Odersky2009-05-081-10/+0
|
* Added sample/starter ScalaCheck testGeoffrey Washburn2008-09-101-0/+10