summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/junit
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Merge pull request #4529 from lrytz/inlineAccessibilityJason Zaugg2015-06-191-6/+10
|\ | | | | Fix illegal inlining of instructions accessing protected members
| * Fix illegal inlining of instructions accessing protected membersLukas Rytz2015-05-281-6/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | There were two issues in the new inliner that would cause a VerifyError and an IllegalAccessError. First, an access to a public member of package protected class C can only be inlined if the destination class can access C. This is tested by t7582b. Second, an access to a protected member requires the receiver object to be a subtype of the class where the instruction is located. So when inlining such an access, we need to know the type of the receiver object - which we don't have. Therefore we don't inline in this case for now. This can be fixed once we have a type propagation analyis. https://github.com/scala-opt/scala/issues/13. This case is tested by t2106. Force kmpSliceSearch test to delambdafy:inline See discussion on https://github.com/scala/scala/pull/4505. The issue will go away when moving to indy-lambda.
* | Merge pull request #4527 from nicky-zs/fix_BigDecimalLukas Rytz2015-06-181-0/+32
|\ \ | | | | | | fix BigDecimal losing MathContext
| * | make BigDecimalTest.testMathContext a bit easier to understandZhong Sheng2015-06-181-13/+14
| | |
| * | add more test for testMathContextZhong Sheng2015-05-291-2/+26
| | |
| * | add unit test for MathContext lostZhong Sheng2015-05-281-0/+7
| |/
* | SI-9348 Fix missing last element in exclusive floating point rangesNiko Vuokko2015-06-172-1/+38
| | | | | | | | | | Fix exclusive floating point ranges to contain also the last element when the end-start difference is not an integer multiple of step.
* | Merge pull request #4534 from Ichoran/sorting-reimplAdriaan Moors2015-06-161-0/+69
|\ \ | | | | | | Clean implementation of sorts for scala.util.Sorting.
| * | Clean implementation of sorts for scala.util.Sorting.Rex Kerr2015-06-011-0/+69
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Removed code based on Sun JDK sorts and implemented new (basic) sorts from scratch. Deferred to Java Arrays.sort whenever practical. Behavior of `scala.util.Sorting` should be unchanged, but changed documentation to specify when the Java methods are being used (as they're typically very fast). A JUnit test is provided. Performance is important for sorts. Everything is better with this patch, though it could be better yet, as described below. Below are sort times (in microseconds, SEM < 5%) for various 1024-element arrays of small case classes that compare on an int field (quickSort), or int arrays that use custom ordering (stableSort). Note: "degenerate" means there are only 16 values possible, so there are lots of ties. Times are all with fresh data (no re-using cache from run to run). Results: ``` random sorted reverse degenerate big:64k tiny:16 Old Sorting.quickSort 234 181 178 103 25,700 1.4 New Sorting.quickSort 170 27 115 74 18,600 0.8 Old Sorting.stableSort 321 234 236 282 32,600 2.1 New Sorting.stableSort 239 16 194 194 25,100 1.2 java.util.Arrays.sort 124 4 8 105 13,500 0.8 java.util.Arrays.sort|Box 126 15 13 112 13,200 0.9 ``` The new versions are uniformly faster, but uniformly slower than Java sorting. scala.util.Sorting has use cases that don't map easily in to Java unless everything is pre-boxed, but the overhead of pre-boxing is minimal compared to the sort. A snapshot of some of my benchmarking code is below. (Yes, lots of repeating myself--it's dangerous not to when trying to get somewhat accurate benchmarks.) ``` import java.util.Arrays import java.util.Comparator import math.Ordering import util.Sorting import reflect.ClassTag val th = ichi.bench.Thyme.warmed() case class N(i: Int, j: Int) {} val a = Array.fill(1024)( Array.tabulate(1024)(i => N(util.Random.nextInt, i)) ) var ai = 0 val b = Array.fill(1024)( Array.tabulate(1024)(i => N(i, i)) ) var bi = 0 val c = Array.fill(1024)( Array.tabulate(1024)(i => N(1024-i, i)) ) var ci = 0 val d = Array.fill(1024)( Array.tabulate(1024)(i => N(util.Random.nextInt(16), i)) ) var di = 0 val e = Array.fill(16)( Array.tabulate(65536)(i => N(util.Random.nextInt, i)) ) var ei = 0 val f = Array.fill(65535)( Array.tabulate(16)(i => N(util.Random.nextInt, i)) ) var fi = 0 val o = new Ordering[N]{ def compare(a: N, b: N) = if (a.i < b.i) -1 else if (a.i > b.i) 1 else 0 } for (s <- Seq("one", "two", "three")) { println(s) th.pbench{ val x = a(ai).clone; ai = (ai+1)%a.length; Sorting.quickSort(x)(o); x(x.length/3) } th.pbench{ val x = b(bi).clone; bi = (bi+1)%b.length; Sorting.quickSort(x)(o); x(x.length/3) } th.pbench{ val x = c(ci).clone; ci = (ci+1)%c.length; Sorting.quickSort(x)(o); x(x.length/3) } th.pbench{ val x = d(di).clone; di = (di+1)%d.length; Sorting.quickSort(x)(o); x(x.length/3) } th.pbench{ val x = e(ei).clone; ei = (ei+1)%e.length; Sorting.quickSort(x)(o); x(x.length/3) } th.pbench{ val x = f(fi).clone; fi = (fi+1)%f.length; Sorting.quickSort(x)(o); x(x.length/3) } } def ix(ns: Array[N]) = { val is = new Array[Int](ns.length) var i = 0 while (i < ns.length) { is(i) = ns(i).i i += 1 } is } val p = new Ordering[Int]{ def compare(a: Int, b: Int) = if (a > b) 1 else if (a < b) -1 else 0 } for (s <- Seq("one", "two", "three")) { println(s) val tag: ClassTag[Int] = implicitly[ClassTag[Int]] th.pbench{ val x = ix(a(ai)); ai = (ai+1)%a.length; Sorting.stableSort(x)(tag, p); x(x.length/3) } th.pbench{ val x = ix(b(bi)); bi = (bi+1)%b.length; Sorting.stableSort(x)(tag, p); x(x.length/3) } th.pbench{ val x = ix(c(ci)); ci = (ci+1)%c.length; Sorting.stableSort(x)(tag, p); x(x.length/3) } th.pbench{ val x = ix(d(di)); di = (di+1)%d.length; Sorting.stableSort(x)(tag, p); x(x.length/3) } th.pbench{ val x = ix(e(ei)); ei = (ei+1)%e.length; Sorting.stableSort(x)(tag, p); x(x.length/3) } th.pbench{ val x = ix(f(fi)); fi = (fi+1)%f.length; Sorting.stableSort(x)(tag, p); x(x.length/3) } } for (s <- Seq("one", "two", "three")) { println(s) th.pbench{ val x = a(ai).clone; ai = (ai+1)%a.length; Arrays.sort(x, o); x(x.length/3) } th.pbench{ val x = b(bi).clone; bi = (bi+1)%b.length; Arrays.sort(x, o); x(x.length/3) } th.pbench{ val x = c(ci).clone; ci = (ci+1)%c.length; Arrays.sort(x, o); x(x.length/3) } th.pbench{ val x = d(di).clone; di = (di+1)%d.length; Arrays.sort(x, o); x(x.length/3) } th.pbench{ val x = e(ei).clone; ei = (ei+1)%e.length; Arrays.sort(x, o); x(x.length/3) } th.pbench{ val x = f(fi).clone; fi = (fi+1)%f.length; Arrays.sort(x, o); x(x.length/3) } } def bx(is: Array[Int]): Array[java.lang.Integer] = { val Is = new Array[java.lang.Integer](is.length) var i = 0 while (i < is.length) { Is(i) = java.lang.Integer.valueOf(is(i)) i += 1 } Is } def xb(Is: Array[java.lang.Integer]): Array[Int] = { val is = new Array[Int](Is.length) var i = 0 while (i < is.length) { is(i) = Is(i).intValue i += 1 } is } val q = new Comparator[java.lang.Integer]{ def compare(a: java.lang.Integer, b: java.lang.Integer) = o.compare(a.intValue, b.intValue) } for (s <- Seq("one", "two", "three")) { println(s) val tag: ClassTag[Int] = implicitly[ClassTag[Int]] th.pbench{ val x = bx(ix(a(ai))); ai = (ai+1)%a.length; Arrays.sort(x, q); xb(x)(x.length/3) } th.pbench{ val x = bx(ix(b(bi))); bi = (bi+1)%b.length; Arrays.sort(x, q); xb(x)(x.length/3) } th.pbench{ val x = bx(ix(c(ci))); ci = (ci+1)%c.length; Arrays.sort(x, q); xb(x)(x.length/3) } th.pbench{ val x = bx(ix(d(di))); di = (di+1)%d.length; Arrays.sort(x, q); xb(x)(x.length/3) } th.pbench{ val x = bx(ix(e(ei))); ei = (ei+1)%e.length; Arrays.sort(x, q); xb(x)(x.length/3) } th.pbench{ val x = bx(ix(f(fi))); fi = (fi+1)%f.length; Arrays.sort(x, q); xb(x)(x.length/3) } } ```
* | | Merge pull request #4519 from lrytz/opt/nullness-2.11Jason Zaugg2015-06-072-0/+247
|\ \ \ | |/ / |/| | Nullness Analysis for GenBCode
| * | Fix aliasing / nullness of CHECKCASTLukas Rytz2015-06-041-0/+26
| | |
| * | Address review feedbackLukas Rytz2015-05-251-9/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Address feedback in #4516 / 57b8da4cd8. Save allocations of NullnessValue - there's only 4 possible instances. Also save tuple allocations in InstructionStackEffect.
| * | Enable nullness analysis in the inlinerLukas Rytz2015-05-251-0/+16
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When inlining an instance call, the inliner has to ensure that a NPE is still thrown if the receiver object is null. By using the nullness analysis, we can avoid emitting this code in case the receiver object is known to be not-null.
| * | Nullness AnalysisLukas Rytz2015-05-221-0/+205
| |/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Tracks nullness of values using an ASM analyzer. Tracking nullness requires alias tracking for local variables and stack values. For example, after an instance call, local variables that point to the same object as the receiver are treated not-null.
* / SI-9332 Iterator.span exhausts leading iteratorSom Snytt2015-05-271-0/+10
|/ | | | | | | | | | | | | Since the leading and trailing iterators returned by span share the underlying iterator, the leading iterator must flag when it is exhausted (when the span predicate fails) since the trailing iterator will advance the underlying iterator. It would also be possible to leave the failing element in the leading lookahead buffer, where it would forever fail the predicate, but that entails evaluating the predicate twice, on both enqueue and dequeue.
* Merge pull request #4415 from Ichoran/issue/9254Adriaan Moors2015-04-221-0/+25
|\ | | | | SI-9254 UnrolledBuffer appends in wrong position
| * SI-9254 UnrolledBuffer appends in wrong positionRex Kerr2015-03-311-0/+25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Fixed two bugs in insertion (insertAll of Unrolled): 1. Incorrect recursion leading to an inability to insert past the first chunk 2. Incorect repositioning of `lastptr` leading to strange `append` behavior after early insertion Added tests checking that both of these things now work. Also added a comment that "waterlineDelim" is misnamed. But we can't fix it now--it's part of the public API. (Shouldn't be, but it is.)
* | Merge pull request #4416 from Ichoran/issue/9197Adriaan Moors2015-04-221-0/+24
|\ \ | | | | | | SI-9197 Duration.Inf not a singleton when deserialized
| * | SI-9197 Duration.Inf not a singleton when deserializedRex Kerr2015-03-311-0/+24
| |/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Made `Duration.Undefined`, `.Inf`, and `.MinusInf` all give back the singleton instance instead of creating a new copy by overriding readResolve. This override can be (and is) private, which at least on Sun's JDK8 doesn't mess with the auto-generated SerialVersionUIDs. Thus, the patch should make things strictly better: if you're on 2.11.7+ on JVMs which pick the same SerialVersionUIDs, you can recover singletons. Everywhere else you were already in trouble anyway.
* | Merge pull request #4462 from som-snytt/issue/badtabAdriaan Moors2015-04-221-0/+20
|\ \ | | | | | | SI-9275 Fix row-first display in REPL
| * | SI-9275 Fix row-first display in REPLSom Snytt2015-04-211-0/+20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | A missing range check in case anyone ever wants to use ``` -Dscala.repl.format=across ``` which was observed only because of competition from Ammonite.
* | | Merge pull request #4461 from adriaanm/rebase-4446Adriaan Moors2015-04-221-1/+1
|\ \ \ | | | | | | | | Fix many typos
| * | | Fix many typosMichał Pociecha2015-04-211-1/+1
| |/ / | | | | | | | | | | | | This commit corrects many typos found in scaladocs and comments. There's also fixed the name of a private method in ICodeCheckers.
* / / Remove stdout/stderr output from Junit testsJason Zaugg2015-04-211-1/+0
|/ /
* | Merge pull request #4431 from adriaanm/rebase-4379Adriaan Moors2015-04-131-3/+55
|\ \ | | | | | | Patmat: efficient reasoning about mutual exclusion
| * | Patmat: efficient reasoning about mutual exclusionGerard Basler2015-04-061-3/+55
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Faster analysis of wide (but relatively flat) class hierarchies by using a more efficient encoding of mutual exclusion. The old CNF encoding for mutually exclusive symbols of a domain added a quadratic number of clauses to the formula to satisfy. E.g. if a domain has the symbols `a`, `b` and `c` then the clauses ``` !a \/ !b /\ !a \/ !c /\ !b \/ !c ``` were added. The first line prevents that `a` and `b` are both true at the same time, etc. There's a simple, more efficient encoding that can be used instead: consider a comparator circuit in hardware, that checks that out of `n` signals, at most 1 is true. Such a circuit can be built in the form of a sequential counter and thus requires only 3n-4 additional clauses [1]. A comprehensible comparison of different encodings can be found in [2]. [1]: http://www.carstensinz.de/papers/CP-2005.pdf [2]: http://www.wv.inf.tu-dresden.de/Publications/2013/report-13-04.pdf
* | | Merge pull request #4413 from lrytz/opt/inliningEverythingLukas Rytz2015-04-077-26/+92
|\ \ \ | |/ / |/| | Fixes and Improvements for the new inliner
| * | SI-9139 don't inline across @strictfp modesLukas Rytz2015-04-011-0/+21
| | | | | | | | | | | | Cannot inline if one of the methods is @strictfp, but not the other.
| * | Test case: cannot inline a private call into a different class.Lukas Rytz2015-04-011-0/+27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Invocations of private methods cannot be inlined into a different class, this would cause an IllegalAccessError.
| * | Clean up the way compiler settings are accessed in the backend.Lukas Rytz2015-04-016-26/+19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Many backend components don't have access to the compiler instance holding the settings. Before this change, individual settings required in these parts of the backend were made available as members of trait BTypes, implemented in the subclass BTypesFromSymbols (which has access to global). This change exposes a single value of type ScalaSettings in the super trait BTypes, which gives access to all compiler settings.
| * | Don't try to inline native methodsLukas Rytz2015-04-011-0/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | Because you can't, really.
| * | Eliminate unreachable code before inlining a methodLukas Rytz2015-04-012-1/+15
| |/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Running an ASM analyzer returns null frames for unreachable instructions in the analyzed method. The inliner (and other components of the optimizer) require unreachable code to be eliminated to avoid null frames. Before this change, unreachable code was eliminated before building the call graph, but not again before inlining: the inliner assumed that methods in the call graph have no unreachable code. This invariant can break when inlining a method. Example: def f = throw e def g = f; println() When building the call graph, both f and g contain no unreachable code. After inlining f, the println() call becomes unreachable. This breaks the inliner's assumption if it tries to inline a call to g. This change intruduces a cache to remember methods that have no unreachable code. This allows invoking DCE every time no dead code is required, and bail out fast. This also simplifies following the control flow in the optimizer (call DCE whenever no dead code is required).
* | Merge pull request #4370 from gbasler/ticket/SI-9181Adriaan Moors2015-04-061-0/+3
|\ \ | |/ |/| SI-9181 Exhaustivity checking does not scale (regression)
| * Add a check to ensure that if the formulas originating from the exhaustivity /Gerard Basler2015-03-021-0/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | reachability analysis are too big to be solved in reasonable time, then we skip the analysis. I also cleaned up warnings. Why did `t9181.scala` work fine with 2.11.4, but is now running out of memory? In order to ensure that the scrutinee is associated only with one of the 400 derived classes we add 400*400 / 2 ~ 80k clauses to ensure mutual exclusivity. In 2.11.4 the translation into CNF used to fail, since it would blow up already at this point in memory. This has been fixed in 2.11.5, but now the DPLL solver is the bottleneck. There's a check in the search for all models (exhaustivity) that it would avoid a blow up, but in the search for a model (reachability), such a check is missing.
* | Merge pull request #4318 from soc/topic/remove-deprecation-warningsLukas Rytz2015-03-281-2/+2
|\ \ | | | | | | Remove deprecation warnings
| * | new{Term,Type}Name→{Term,Type}Name, tpename/nme→{type,term}NamesSimon Ochsenreither2015-03-261-2/+2
| | |
* | | SI-9038 fix scaladoc syntax highlightning to leave unicode aloneAntoine Gourlay2015-03-261-0/+22
|/ / | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Syntax highlightning in code blocks used to manipulate the raw bytes of a String, converting them to chars when needed, which breaks Unicode surrogate pairs. Using a char array instead of a byte array will leave them alone.
* | Don't inline methods containing super calls into other classesLukas Rytz2015-03-122-13/+61
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Method bodies that contain a super call cannot be inlined into other classes. The same goes for methods containing calls to private methods, but that was already ensured before by accessibility checks. The last case of `invokespecial` instructions is constructor calls. Those can be safely moved into different classes (as long as the constructor is accessible at the new location). Note that scalac never emits methods / constructors as private in bytecode.
* | Test case for SI-9111 workaround.Lukas Rytz2015-03-111-1/+42
| |
* | Ensure to re-write only trait method calls of actual trait methodsLukas Rytz2015-03-111-0/+70
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The inliner would incorrectly treat trait field accessors like ordinary trait member methods and try to re-write invocations to the corresponding static method in the implementation class. This rewrite usually failed because no method was found in the impl class. However, for lazy val fields, there exists a member in the impl class with the same name, and the rewrite was performed. The result was that every field access would execute the lazy initializer instead of reading the field. This commit checks the traitMethodWithStaticImplementation field of the ScalaInlineInfo classfile attribute and puts an explicit `safeToRewrite` flag to each call site in the call graph. This cleans up the code in the inliner that deals with rewriting trait callsites.
* | Issue inliner warnings for callsites that cannot be inlinedLukas Rytz2015-03-1111-43/+283
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Issue precise warnings when the inliner fails to inline or analyze a callsite. Inline failures may have various causes, for example because some class cannot be found on the classpath when building the call graph. So we need to store problems that happen early in the optimizer (when building the necessary data structures, call graph, ClassBTypes) to be able to report them later in case the inliner accesses the related data. We use Either to store these warning messages. The commit introduces an implicit class `RightBiasedEither` to make Either easier to use for error propagation. This would be subsumed by a biased either in the standard library (or could use a Validation). The `info` of each ClassBType is now an Either. There are two cases where the info is not available: - The type info should be parsed from a classfile, but the class cannot be found on the classpath - SI-9111, the type of a Java source originating class symbol cannot be completed This means that the operations on ClassBType that query the info now return an Either, too. Each Callsite in the call graph now stores the source position of the call instruction. Since the call graph is built after code generation, we build a map from invocation nodes to positions during code gen and query it when building the call graph. The new inliner can report a large number of precise warnings when a callsite cannot be inlined, or if the inlining metadata cannot be computed precisely, for example due to a missing classfile. The new -Yopt-warnings multi-choice option allows configuring inliner warnings. By default (no option provided), a one-line summary is issued in case there were callsites annotated @inline that could not be inlined.
* | Limit the size of the ByteCodeRepository cacheLukas Rytz2015-03-111-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | I observed cases (eg Scaladoc tests) where we end up with 17k+ ClassNodes, which makes 500 MB.
* | Cast receiver if necessary when rewriting trait calls to impl methodLukas Rytz2015-03-112-5/+21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The self parameter type may be incompatible with the trait type. trait T { self: S => def foo = 1 } The $self parameter type of T$class.foo is S, which may be unrelated to T. If we re-write a call to T.foo to T$class.foo, we need to cast the receiver to S, otherwise we get a VerifyError.
* | Inline final methods defined in traitsLukas Rytz2015-03-1110-51/+573
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In order to inline a final trait method, callsites of such methods are first re-written from interface calls to static calls of the trait's implementation class. Then inlining proceeds as ususal. One problem that came up during development was that mixin methods are added to class symbols only for classes being compiled, but not for others. In order to inline a mixin method, we need the InlineInfo, which so far was built using the class (and method) symbols. So we had a problem with separate compilation. Looking up the symbol from a given classfile name was already known to be brittle (it's also one of the weak points of the current inliner), so we changed the strategy. Now the InlineInfo for every class is encoded in a new classfile attribute. This classfile attribute is relatively small, because all strings it references (class internal names, method names, method descriptors) would exist anyway in the constant pool, so it just adds a few references. When building the InlineInfo for a class symbol, we only look at the symbol properties for symbols being compiled in the current run. For unpickled symbols, we build the InlineInfo by reading the classfile attribute. This change also adds delambdafy:method classes to currentRun.symSource. Otherwise, currentRun.compiles(lambdaClass) is false.
* | Don't crash the inliner in mixed compilationLukas Rytz2015-03-113-7/+42
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In mixed compilation, the bytecode of Java classes is not availalbe: the Scala compiler does not produce any, and there are no classfiles yet. When inlining a (Scala defined) method that contains an invocation to a Java method, we need the Java method's bytecode in order to check whether that invocation can be transplanted to the new location without causing an IllegalAccessError. If the bytecode cannot be found, inlining won't be allowed.
* | Looking up the ClassNode for an InternalName returns an OptionLukas Rytz2015-03-113-3/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | The `ByteCodeRepository.classNode(InternalName)` method now returns an option. Concretely, in mixed compilation, the compiler does not create a ClassNode for Java classes, and they may not exist on the classpath either.
* | Integrate the inliner into the backend pipelineLukas Rytz2015-03-112-10/+211
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The current heuristics are simple: attempt to inline every method annotated `@inline`. Cycles in the inline request graph are broken in a determinisitc manner. Inlining is then performed starting at the leaves of the inline request graph, i.e., with those callsites where the target method has no callsites to inline. This expansion strategy can make a method grow arbitrarily. We will most likely have to add some thresholds and / or other measures to prevent size issues.
* | Build a call graph for inlining decisionsLukas Rytz2015-03-113-6/+157
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Inlining decisions will be taken by analyzing the ASM bytecode. This commit adds tools to build a call graph representation that can be used for these decisions. The call graph is currently built by considering method descriptors of callsite instructions. It will become more precise by using data flow analyses.
* | Reuse the same compiler instance for all tests in a JUnit classLukas Rytz2015-03-1111-51/+158
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Note that JUnit creates a new instance of the test class for running each test method. So the compiler instance is added to the companion. However, the JVM would quickly run out of memory when running multiple tests, as the compilers cannot be GCd. So we make it a `var`, and set it to null when a class is done. For that we use JUnit's `@AfterClass` which is required to be on a static method. Therefore we add a Java class with such a static method that we can extend from Scala.
* | Tools to perform inlining.Lukas Rytz2015-03-111-0/+193
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The method Inliner.inline clones the bytecode of a method and copies the new instructions to the callsite with the necessary modifications. See comments in the code. More tests are added in a later commit which integrates the inliner into the backend - tests are easier to write after that.