| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
protected and its bevy of corner cases. Closes #3939, #3947. This patch
is intended for both trunk and 2.8.1. Already reviewed and co-authored
by moors, and review by oderksy.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
One last batch of test cleanups and I think I'll call it a day. If
you're worried I didn't leave any for anyone else, let me put your fears
to rest. PLENTY left to sift through. No review.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The next batch of tests put up a little more struggle, but only a
little. See test/pending/pos/unappgadteval.scala (the changes for which
were in the previous commit) for an example of a test which might be on
to something. Any idea what it would take to get it working?
// the key lines
case i @ Suc() => { (y: Int) => y + 1 } // a = Int => Int
case f @ Lam[b,c](x, e) => { (y: b) => eval(e, env.extend(x, y)) } // a = b=>c
No review.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Sorting through the tests in pending from oldest to newest because I
don't believe in having useless appendages. The verdict on the oldest
fifteen tests is: 15/15 are fixed. Many were already in files under a
different name. I moved a few and deleted the rest. Fun fact of the
day: apparently there was a time when to call into java varargs with no
arguments you might have to write something like:
getClass().getMethod("getCount", Array[java.lang.Class[T] forSome { type T }]())
On this basis I retract any complaints I've ever had about anything.
There is one question mark outlined in pos/testCoercionThis.scala, a
file formerly called pos/moors.scala and therefore... review by moors.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
including "CheckEither", written against scalacheck 1.2 in the year 471
AD. Removed all the duplicates I could find, mostly between pending
and files. Renamed a bunch of tests so they wouldn't look like likely
duplicates next time around. Nominated somebody else to do this once in
a while.
No review.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reverts r21973, the patch I characterized as "hacky but no-risk" in my
commit message, for causing #3480. Closes #3480. I'd say no review but
who can trust a guy who throws around "no risk" with such abandon.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If I work on this patch any longer without checking in I will go
stark raving mad. It is broken up into a couple pieces. This one is
the changes to test/. It includes fixing a bunch of tests, removing
deprecated constructs, moving jars used by tests to the most specific
plausible location rather than having all jars on the classpath of all
tests, and some filesystem layout change (continuations get their whole
own srcpath.) This would be the world's most tedious review, so let's
say no review.
[Note: after this commit, I doubt things will build very smoothly until
the rest of the partest changes follow. Which should only be seconds,
but just in case.]
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
[no content change] Fixed all SVN properties: mimes, EOL, executable. Id
expansion is consistently enabled for Scala/Java/C# sources in 'src/'
and consistently disabled and removed from everywhere else: there should
not be any dead Id tags anymore.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Began evaluation of the tests in pending, and moved/updated/removed
.scala and .check files as warranted.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
These tests have already been moved from pending to files.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
2. Added * operator to RichString
3. changed zip in Array to accept arrays of different length
4. changed takeWhile/dropWhile in Array to yield Projections
5. Added Manifest types
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
quick fix for the first part of bug1210 (compiler loops in normalize), so that the other problem is revealed: escaping variable is not detected. For the first part, I added an ugly explicit if to `normalize` -- I haven't figured out why it's needed yet.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
adding test files from tcpoly branch without history -- much faster this way, sorry
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
