summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/scaladoc/resources/implicits-known-type-classes-res.scala
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* SI-6363 removes scala.reflect.baseEugene Burmako2012-09-191-1/+2
| | | | | As the experience has shown, there's no need for a separate layer of reflection in scala-library.jar. Therefore I'm putting an end to it.
* Scaladoc: updated type class descriptionsVlad Ureche2012-07-161-0/+38
The known type class descriptions give you a humanly-understandable explanation for [T: TypeClass] in the implicit conversions. For example [T: Integral] will tell you that T must be an integral type such as Integer and co. Now that the reflection dust settled, I can actually add the test to make sure the well-known type classes are intercepted and explanations are given instead of the usual "the type T is context-bounded by TypeClass"