| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit integrates with the compiler the whole flat classpath
representation build next to the recursive one as an alternative.
From now flat classpath really works and can be turned on. There's
added flag -YclasspathImpl with two options: recursive (the default
one) and flat.
It was needed to make the dynamic dispatch to the particular
classpath representation according to the chosen type of a classpath
representation.
There's added PathResolverFactory which is used instead of a concrete
implementation of a path resolver. It turned out that only a small
subset of path resolvers methods is used outside this class in Scala
sources. Therefore, PathResolverFactory returns an instance of a base
interface PathResolverResult providing only these used methods.
PathResolverFactory in combination with matches in some other places
ensures that in all places using classpath we create/get the proper
representation.
Also the classPath method in Global is modified to use the dynamic
dispatch. This is very important change as a return type changed to
the base ClassFileLookup providing subset of old ClassPath public
methods. It can be problematic if someone was using in his project
the explicit ClassPath type or public methods which are not provided
via ClassFileLookup. I tested flat classpath with sbt and Scala IDE
and there were no problems. Also was looking at sources of some other
projects like e.g. Scala plugin for IntelliJ and there shouldn't be
problems, I think, but it would be better to check these changes
using the community build.
Scalap's Main.scala is changed to be able to use both implementations
and also to use flags related to the classpath implementation.
The classpath invalidation is modified to work properly with the old
(recursive) classpath representation after changes made in a Global.
In the case of the attempt to use the invalidation for the flat cp it
just throws exception with a message that the flat one currently
doesn't support the invalidation. And also that's why the partest's
test for the invalidation has been changed to use (always) the old
implementation. There's added an adequate comment with TODO to this
file.
There's added partest test generating various dependencies
(directories, zips and jars with sources and class files) and testing
whether the compilation and further running an application works
correctly, when there are these various types of entries specified as
-classpath and -sourcepath. It should be a good approximation of real
use cases.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The structure of scalap's Main has been refactored.
EmptyClasspath is deleted. It looks that it was unused since this
commit: https://github.com/scala/scala/commit/e594fe58ef8116a4bd2560ad0a856ad58ae9db33
Also classpath logging is changed and now uses asClassPathString
method. It was needed to modify one test because of that but it
won't depend on a particular representation.
There aren't changes in the way scalap works.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit adds dedicated FlatClassPathResolver loading classpath
entries as FlatClassPath.
Most of the common logic from PathResolver for the old classpath has
been moved to the base, separate class which isn't dependent on
a particular classpath representation. Thanks to that it was possible
to reuse it when creating an adequate path resolver for the flat
classpath representation.
This change doesn't modify the way the compiler works. It also
doesn't change nothing from the perspective of someone who already
uses PathResolver in some project or even extends it - at least as
long as he/she doesn't need to use flat classpath.
There are also added JUnit tests inter alia comparing entries created
using the old and the new classpath representations (whether the flat
one created using the new path resolver returns the same entries as
the recursive one).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There's added AggregateFlatClassPath - an equivalent of
MergedClassPath from the old implementation. It is supposed to group
classpath instances handling different files being directories, zips
or jars.
Unlike in the case of the old (recursive) implementation, there won't
be a deep, nested hierarchy of classpath instances - just one root
(aggregate) and a flat structure of its children.
AggregateFlatClassPath ensures the distinction of classpath entries
and merges corresponding entries for class and source files into one
entry. This is required as SymbolLoaders class makes use of this kind
of ClassRepresentation.
There are also added unit tests which check whether
AggregateFlatClassPath obtains correct entries from classpath
instances specified in a constructor and whether it preserves the
ordering in the case of repeated entries. There's added a test type
of flat classpath using VirtualFiles so it's easy to check the real
behaviour.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When unpickling a class, we create stub symbols for references
to classes absent from the current classpath. If these references
only appear in method signatures that aren't called, we can
proceed with compilation. This is in line with javac.
We're getting better at this, but there are still some gaps.
This bug is about the behaviour when a package is completely
missing, rather than just a single class within that package.
To make this work we have to add two special cases to the unpickler:
- When unpickling a `ThisType`, convert a `StubTermSymbol` into
a `StubTypeSymbol`. We hit this when unpickling
`ThisType(missingPackage)`.
- When unpickling a reference to `<owner>.name` where `<owner>`
is a stub symbol, don't call info on that owner, but rather
allow the enclosing code in `readSymbol` fall through to
create a stub for the member.
The test case was distilled from an a problem that a Spray user
encountered when Akka was missing from the classpath.
Two existing test cases have progressed, and the checkfiles are
accordingly updated.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
It passed in PR validation but failed in a later run.
There are some clever ideas bouncing around to make it
stable, but in the meantime I'll shunt it into disabled.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
References to Threads would be retained long after their termination if
reflection is used in them. This led to a steady, long memory leak in
applications using reflection in thread pools.
|
| |\
| |
| | |
SI-5938 Test for a FSC bug with mixin, duplicate static forwarders
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Under resident compilation, we were getting multiple copies of static
forwarders created for mixed in methods. It seems like the bug was
fixed as a by-product of #4040.
This commit adds a test to show this. I've confirmed that the test
fails appropriately with 2.11.4.
For future reference, before I figured out how to write the test
for this one (test/resident doesn't seem to let you run the code
after compiling it), I was using bash to test as follows:
(export V=2.11.x; (scalac-hash $V sandbox/t5938_1.scala; (for i in 1 2; do echo sandbox/t5938.scala; done; printf '\n') | scalac-hash $V -Xresident); stty echo; scala-hash $V X ; echo ':javap -public X' | scala-hash $V);
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | | |
SI-7596 Curtail overloaded symbols during unpickling
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
In code like:
object O { val x = A; def x(a: Any) = ... }
object P extends O.x.A
The unpickler was using an overloaded symbol for `x` in the
parent type of `P`. This led to compilation failures under
separate compilation.
The code that leads to this is in `Unpicklers`:
def fromName(name: Name) = name.toTermName match {
case nme.ROOT => loadingMirror.RootClass
case nme.ROOTPKG => loadingMirror.RootPackage
case _ => adjust(owner.info.decl(name))
}
This commit filters the overloaded symbol based its stability
unpickling a singleton type. That seemed a slightly safer place
than in `fromName`.
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | | |
SI-8597 Improved pattern unchecked warnings
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
The spec says that `case _: List[Int]` should be always issue
an unchecked warning:
> Types which are not of one of the forms described above are
> also accepted as type patterns. However, such type patterns
> will be translated to their erasure (§3.7). The Scala compiler
> will issue an “unchecked” warning for these patterns to flag
> the possible loss of type-safety.
But the implementation goes a little further to omit warnings
based on the static type of the scrutinee. As a trivial example:
def foo(s: Seq[Int]) = s match { case _: List[Int] => }
need not issue this warning.
These discriminating unchecked warnings are domain of
`CheckabilityChecker`.
Let's deconstruct the reported bug:
def nowarn[T] = (null: Any) match { case _: Some[T] => }
We used to determine that if the first case matched, the scrutinee
type would be `Some[Any]` (`Some` is covariant). If this statically
matches `Some[T]` in a pattern context, we don't need to issue an
unchecked warning. But, our blanket use of `existentialAbstraction`
in `matchesPattern` loosened the pattern type to `Some[Any]`, and
the scrutinee type was deemed compatible.
I've added a new method, `scrutConformsToPatternType` which replaces
pattern type variables by wildcards, but leaves other abstract
types intact in the pattern type. We have to use this inside
`CheckabilityChecker` only. If we were to make `matchesPattern`
stricter in the same way, tests like `pos/t2486.scala` would fail.
I have introduced a new symbol test to (try to) identify pattern
type variables introduced by `typedBind`. Its not pretty, and it
might be cleaner to reserve a new flag for these.
I've also included a test variation exercising with nested matches.
The pattern type of the inner case can't, syntactically, refer to the
pattern type variable of the enclosing case. If it could, we would
have to be more selective in our wildcarding in `ptMatchesPatternType`
by restricting ourselves to type variables associated with the closest
enclosing `CaseDef`.
As some further validation of the correctness of this patch,
four stray warnings have been teased out of
neg/unchecked-abstract.scala
I also had to changes `typeArgsInTopLevelType` to extract the type
arguments of `Array[T]` if `T` is an abstract type. This avoids the
"Checkability checker says 'Uncheckable', but uncheckable type
cannot be found" warning and consequent overly lenient analysis.
Without this change, the warning was suppressed for:
def warnArray[T] = (null: Any) match { case _: Array[T] => }
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | | |
SI-8253 Fix incorrect parsing of <elem xmlns={f("a")}/>
|
| | |/ / /
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
The spliced application was placed in the `attrMap` in
`SymbolicXMLBuilder` and later incorrectly matched by a pattern
intended only to match:
xml.Text(s)
That attribute value is generated by parsing:
<elem xmlns='a'/>
So the net effect was that the two fragments of XML were identical!
This commit sharpens up the match to really look for a syntactic
`_root_.scala.xml.Text("...")`.
The test just prints the parse trees of a variety of cases, as we
we should not test the modularized XML library in scala/scala.
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | | |
SI-5639 Fix spurious discarding of implicit import
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
To be conservative, I've predicated this fix in `-Xsource:2.12`.
This is done in separate commit to show that the previous fix
passes the test suite, rather than just tests with `-Xsource:2.12`.
|
| | |/ / /
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
In Scala fa0cdc7b (just before 2.9.0), a regression in implicit
search, SI-2866, was discovered by Lift and fixed. The nature of
the regression was that an in-scope, non-implicit symbol failed to
shadow an eponymous implicit import.
The fix for this introduced `isQualifyingImplicit` which discards
in-scope implicits when the current `Context`'s scope contains
a name-clashing entry.
Incidentally, this proved to be a shallow solution, and we later
improved shadowing detection in SI-4270 / 9129cfe9. That picked
up cases where a locally defined symbol in an intervening scope
shadowed an implicit.
This commit includes the test case from the comments of SI-2866.
Part of it is tested as a neg test (to test reporting of ambiguities),
and the rest is tested in a run test (to test which implicits are
picked.)
However, in the test case of SI-5639, we see that the scope lookup
performend by `isQualifyingImplicit` is fooled by a "ghost" module
symbol. The apparition I'm referring to is entered when
`initializeFromClassPath` / `enterClassAndModule` encounters
a class file named 'Baz.class', and speculatively enters _both_ a
class and module symbol. AFAIK, this is done to defer parsing the
class file to determine what inside. If it happens to be a Java
compiled class, the module symbol is needed to house the static
members.
This commit adds a condition that `Symbol#exists` which shines a torch
(forces the info) in the direction of the ghost module symbol. In our
test, this causes it to vanish, as we only need a class symbol for
the Scala defined `class Baz`.
The existing `pos` test for this actually did not exercise the bug,
separate compilation is required. It was originally checked in to
`pending` with this error, and then later moved to `pos` when someone
noticed it was not failing.
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | | |
SI-6502 Reenables loading jars into the running REPL (regression in 2.10)
|
| | | |/ /
| |/| | |
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | | |
SI-8925, SI-7407 test cases, fixed in new backend
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Given that the issues are old (2.10) and we move to the new backend
in 2.12, I don't plan to fix them in GenASM.
The test case for 7407 existed already, this commit just adds
`-Yopt:l:none` to the flags to make no dead code is eliminated.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
SI-8835 Iterator tests can be junit
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Addressing feedback from the collections test czar,
updated a few of the primitive tests. Avoided testing
addition and just asserted.
Updated indexOf test to test Iterator.indexOf.
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Without loss of generality or convenience, but helps
reduce the number of files in test/files and may reduce
compile times for test suite.
This commit includes the fix from #3963 and an extra
test of that fix that ensures the stack doesn't grow
on chained drops.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
SI-8932 Fix dropRight/takeRight implementations
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
I looked up at all the overrides of `IterableLike#takeRight` and
`IterableLike#dropRight` and replaced usages of its argument `n` with
`math.max(n, 0)` every time it was being used in an index subtraction.
Fixes [SI-8932](https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-8932).
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
SI-8449 Fix spurious error with Java raw type over a Scala class
|
| | | |_|_|_|/ /
| |/| | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
When the Scala typechecker typechecks signatures in Java sources,
it must enable use of a type constructor without applied type
arguments (a raw type).
However, the check in `adaptType::properTypeRequired` was too
restricive: it only allows raw types given a) we are typechecking a
Java source file and b) the type constructor itself is Java defined.
The second check does not make sense; it is perfectly legal to define
a Java raw type for over a Scala defined type constructor. This commit
removes it.
The bug was noticed in the Scaladoc context, as it explores the
signatures of all Java sources so it can document them. But the
enclosed test demonstrates the underlying bug under normal
compilation.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|/ / / /
|/| | | | | | |
SI-8534 Avoid crash in erroneous SelectFromTypeTree
|
| | |/ / / / /
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
PR #2374 changed the behaviour of `typedSingletonTypeTree` in the
presence of an error typed reference tree. It incorrectly
returns the reference tree in case on an error. However, this is
a term tree, which is an inconsistent result with the input type
tree. Consequently, a `typedSelectInternal` later fails when
using this as the qualifier of a `SelectFromTypeTree`.
Both test cases enclosed show this symptom.
This commit:
- Returns `tree` rather than `refTyped` when `refTyped` is
error typed or when it isn't suitable as a stable prefix.
- Avoids issuing a cascading "not a stable prefix" error if the
`refTyped` is error typed.
- Adds an extra layer of defense in `typedSelectFromTypeTree`
to bail out quickly if the qualifier is error typed.
The last measure is not necessary to fix this bug.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|/ / / /
|/| | | | | |
SI-8835 Fix implementation of Iterator drop to remove quadratic behavior
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
SI-5413 Test for fixed owner-corruption bug with names/defaults
|
| | | |/ / / /
| |/| | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Fixed in SI-8111 / 2.10.4.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
SI-5665 Test case for fixed private[this], trait crasher
|
| | |/ / / / /
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Fixed in SI-5508 / cca4d51db.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Make t8960 pass under delambdafy:method
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
When using delambdafy:method, anonymous function classes are not
currently specialized, as noted here:
https://github.com/scala/scala/blob/f08e96571479552b103b15cc2d40ea5454999546/src/compiler/scala/tools/nsc/transform/Delambdafy.scala#L26
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
SI-1994 Test case for fixed overriding problem
|
| | | |_|_|_|_|/
| |/| | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
The test case passes since Scala 2.9.2.
Prior, it failed with:
~/scala/2.9.1/bin/scalac sandbox/t1994.scala
sandbox/t1994.scala:9: error: method y overrides nothing
override def y = 1
^
one error found
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
SI-7750 Test case for fixed spurious existential feature warning
|
| | |/ / / / / /
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
In 2.11.0-M8, the enclosed test issued the following feature
warning:
sandbox/t7750.scala:7: warning: the existential type LazyCombiner[_$1,_$2,_$3] forSome { type _$1; type _$2; type _$3 <: Growable[_$1] with Sizing }, which cannot be expressed by wildcards,
This went way in 2.11.0-RC1 after we turned off the problematic
attempt to infer existential bounds based on the bounds of the
corresponding type parameters.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
SI-8965 Account for corner case in "unrelated types" warning
|
| | |/ / / / / /
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
It's okay for the two types to LUB to something above `Object`
if they both individially were its supertype.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
[sammy] eta-expansion, overloading, existentials
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Generate correct trees to refer to repeated params using `gen.paramToArg`.
Based on retronym's review feedback.
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Don't naively derive types for the single method's signature
from the provided function's type, as it may be a subtype
of the method's MethodType.
Instead, once the sam class type is fully defined, determine
the sam's info as seen from the class's type, and use those
to generate the correct override.
```
scala> Arrays.stream(Array(1, 2, 3)).map(n => 2 * n + 1).average.ifPresent(println)
5.0
scala> IntStream.range(1, 4).forEach(println)
1
2
3
```
Also, minimal error reporting
Can't figure out how to do it properly, but some reporting
is better than crashing. Right? Test case that illustrates
necessity of the clumsy stop gap `if (block exists (_.isErroneous))`
enclosed as `sammy_error_exist_no_crash`
added TODO for repeated and by-name params
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Playing with Java 8 Streams from the repl showed
we weren't eta-expanding, nor resolving overloading for SAMs.
Also, the way Java uses wildcards to represent use-site variance
stresses type inference past its bendiness point (due to excessive existentials).
I introduce `wildcardExtrapolation` to simplify the resulting types
(without losing precision): `wildcardExtrapolation(tp) =:= tp`.
For example, the `MethodType` given by `def bla(x: (_ >: String)): (_ <: Int)`
is both a subtype and a supertype of `def bla(x: String): Int`.
Translating http://winterbe.com/posts/2014/07/31/java8-stream-tutorial-examples/
into Scala shows most of this works, though we have some more work to do (see near the end).
```
scala> import java.util.Arrays
scala> import java.util.stream.Stream
scala> import java.util.stream.IntStream
scala> val myList = Arrays.asList("a1", "a2", "b1", "c2", "c1")
myList: java.util.List[String] = [a1, a2, b1, c2, c1]
scala> myList.stream.filter(_.startsWith("c")).map(_.toUpperCase).sorted.forEach(println)
C1
C2
scala> myList.stream.filter(_.startsWith("c")).map(_.toUpperCase).sorted
res8: java.util.stream.Stream[?0] = java.util.stream.SortedOps$OfRef@133e7789
scala> Arrays.asList("a1", "a2", "a3").stream.findFirst.ifPresent(println)
a1
scala> Stream.of("a1", "a2", "a3").findFirst.ifPresent(println)
a1
scala> IntStream.range(1, 4).forEach(println)
<console>:37: error: object creation impossible, since method accept in trait IntConsumer of type (x$1: Int)Unit is not defined
(Note that Int does not match Any: class Int in package scala is a subclass of class Any in package scala, but method parameter types must match exactly.)
IntStream.range(1, 4).forEach(println)
^
scala> IntStream.range(1, 4).forEach(println(_: Int)) // TODO: can we avoid this annotation?
1
2
3
scala> Arrays.stream(Array(1, 2, 3)).map(n => 2 * n + 1).average.ifPresent(println(_: Double))
5.0
scala> Stream.of("a1", "a2", "a3").map(_.substring(1)).mapToInt(_.parseInt).max.ifPresent(println(_: Int)) // whoops!
ReplGlobal.abort: Unknown type: <error>, <error> [class scala.reflect.internal.Types$ErrorType$, class scala.reflect.internal.Types$ErrorType$] TypeRef? false
error: Unknown type: <error>, <error> [class scala.reflect.internal.Types$ErrorType$, class scala.reflect.internal.Types$ErrorType$] TypeRef? false
scala.reflect.internal.FatalError: Unknown type: <error>, <error> [class scala.reflect.internal.Types$ErrorType$, class scala.reflect.internal.Types$ErrorType$] TypeRef? false
at scala.reflect.internal.Reporting$class.abort(Reporting.scala:59)
scala> IntStream.range(1, 4).mapToObj(i => "a" + i).forEach(println)
a1
a2
a3
```
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
SI-8954 Make @deprecated{Overriding,Inheritance} aware of @deprecated.
|
