summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Merge pull request #1562 from paulp/issue/6600Josh Suereth2012-11-021-0/+8
|\ | | | | Fix for SI-6600, regression with ScalaNumber.
| * Fix for SI-6600, regression with ScalaNumber.Paul Phillips2012-11-021-0/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Not much in the end; I divided ScalaNumericConversions into two traits such that the ScalaNumericAnyConversions can be used in value classes, and ScalaNumericConversions can override methods in ScalaNumber (since one trait cannot do both those things.) The fact that ScalaNumber is privileged for equality but a) extends java.lang.Number and therefore b) cannot be a value class is something we will want to revisit real soon.
* | SI-6562 Fix crash with class nested in @inline methodJason Zaugg2012-11-021-0/+14
|/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | e6b4204604 moved access widenings from ExplicitOuter to SuperAccessors to reflect them in pickled signatures so that the inliner can take advantage of them under separate compilation. The followup discussion [1] determined that this wasn't the right solution: while it enabled new separate compilation inlinings, it failed to widen access of outer pointers and hence prevented certain inlinings. A better solution was proposed: modify the inliner to know that access widening is guaranteed to have happened in ExplicitOuter for any field accessed by an @inline-d method body, rather than relying solely on the pickled types. But this hasn't happened yet. In the meantime 07f94297 / #1121 reinstated the access widening to SuperAccessors, but took a slightly different approach, using `Symbol#enclMethod` rather than `closestEnclMethod`. That deviation triggers SI-6562. This commit goes back to `closestEnclMethod`. [1] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/scala-internals/iPkMCygzws4
* Merge pull request #1526 from paulp/value-classes/6534-equalsAdriaan Moors2012-11-014-0/+42
|\ | | | | New take on SI-6534, value classes.
| * Modification to SI-6534 patch.Paul Phillips2012-10-302-1/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | Only exclude hashCode and equals from being overridden in value classes, not other synthetics which may turn up such as case class methods.
| * New take on SI-6534, value classes.Paul Phillips2012-10-244-0/+36
| | | | | | | | | | Don't prohibit equals and hashCode in universal traits; instead, always override them in value classes.
* | Merge pull request #1540 from odersky/ticket/6500Adriaan Moors2012-11-011-0/+13
|\ \ | | | | | | Fixes SI-6500 by making erasure more regular.
| * | Fixes SI-6500 by making erasure more regular.Martin Odersky2012-10-301-0/+13
| |/ | | | | | | | | | | With the introduction of value classes, erasure uses specialErasure where a value class C with underlying type T is unboxed to an ErasedValueType. ErasedValue types are eliminated on phase later, in post-erasure. This was done everywhere, except in the parameter types of bridge methods. That was a mistale, because that way bridge methods could not do the boxing/unboxing logic triggered by ErasedValueTypes. Note: there is one remaining use of erasure (not specialErasure) in Erasure.scala. I put in a comment why that is OK.
* | Merge pull request #1542 from adriaanm/odersky-ticket/6556v2Adriaan Moors2012-11-011-0/+32
|\ \ | | | | | | SI-6556 no assert for surprising ctor result type
| * | SI-6556 no assert for surprising ctor result typeMartin Odersky2012-10-301-0/+32
| |/ | | | | | | | | | | | | Previous fix to value classes uncovered some questionable cases in the backend where result types of constructor signatures are surprising. It's not a big deal because these types will be ignored afterwards anyway. But the method uncovered some questionable situations which we should follow up on. However, breaking 2.9 code because of this is way too harsh. That's why the asserts were converted to warnings. review by @paulp, @adriaanm
* | Removing actors-migration from main repository so it can live on elsewhere.Josh Suereth2012-11-012-35/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | * Removes actors-migration hooks from partest * Removes actors-migration code * removes actors-migration tests * removes actors-migration distribution packaging.
* | Merge branch '2.10.0-wip' of github.com:scala/scala into 2.10.0-wipJosh Suereth2012-11-017-0/+84
|\ \
| * \ Merge pull request #1536 from vjovanov/issues/SI-6581Josh Suereth2012-10-312-0/+35
| |\ \ | | | | | | | | SI-6581 fixed by inlining `Actor.self`.
| | * | SI-6581 fixed by inlining `Actor.self`.Vojin Jovanovic2012-10-302-0/+35
| | |/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This avoids the necessary type cast that was preventing leakage of internal migration classes. Review by @phaller
| * | Merge pull request #1532 from hubertp/2.10.0-wip-issue/5031Josh Suereth2012-10-313-0/+17
| |\ \ | | | | | | | | Fixes SI-5031 for separate compilation scenario.
| | * | Fixes SI-5031 for separate compilation scenario.Hubert Plociniczak2012-10-283-0/+17
| | |/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When you have a conflicting member in package object and normal package that share the same namespace we remove the latter ClassSymbol from the scope. Now, this has an unpleasant consequence that companionClass/companionModule/companionSymbol no longer work correctly as they rely on finding the correspondent symbol using decls of the owner. This fixes the problem of SI-5031 for separate compilation. Why the above change matters for finding foo.bar.Foo? Because when parsing the class we needed information about the static module (and we have the correct module symbol when completing the info). It's just that 043ce6d0565c9d5d960 relied on no longer valid assumptions. So we were getting NoSymbol and sym.exist was failing. Obviously a more complete solution would be better if we didn't rely on the scope but that's too big to change for 2.10.0.
| * / SI-6575 Plug inference leak of AbstractPartialFunJason Zaugg2012-10-282-0/+32
| |/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Usually this isn't needed, as partial functions can only be defined with an expected type. But if that expected type is and inherited method return type, the actual type of the partial function literal is used, and the implementation detail of `AbstractPartialFunction[A, B] with Serializable` leaks out. After this change, the inferred types match those from Scala 2.9.2. ticket/6575 ~/code/scala scalac29 -Xprint:typer test/files/pos/t6575a.scala | grep def > 29.txt ticket/6575 ~/code/scala squalac -Xprint:typer test/files/pos/t6575a.scala | grep def > 210.txt ticket/6575 ~/code/scala diff -u 29.txt 210.txt --- 29.txt 2012-10-28 13:51:07.000000000 +0100 +++ 210.txt 2012-10-28 13:51:20.000000000 +0100 @@ -1,7 +1,16 @@ def foo: PartialFunction[Int,Int] def /*Y*/$init$(): Unit = { - absoverride def foo: PartialFunction[Int,Int] = ((x0$1: Int) => x0$1 match { + absoverride def foo: PartialFunction[Int,Int] = { + def <init>(): anonymous class $anonfun = { + final override def applyOrElse[A1 >: Nothing <: Int, B1 >: Int <: Any](x$1: A1, default: A1 => B1): B1 = (x$1: A1 @unchecked) match { + final def isDefinedAt(x$1: Int): Boolean = (x$1: Int @unchecked) match { def /*Z*/$init$(): Unit = { - absoverride def foo: PartialFunction[Int,Int] = ((x0$2: Int) => x0$2 match { + absoverride def foo: PartialFunction[Int,Int] = { + def <init>(): anonymous class $anonfun = { + final override def applyOrElse[A1 >: Nothing <: Int, B1 >: Int <: Any](x$1: A1, default: A1 => B1): B1 = (x$1: A1 @unchecked) match { + final def isDefinedAt(x$1: Int): Boolean = (x$1: Int @unchecked) match { def /*Comb*/$init$(): Unit = { - absoverride def foo: PartialFunction[Int,Int] = ((x0$3: Int) => x0$3 match { + absoverride def foo: PartialFunction[Int,Int] = { + def <init>(): anonymous class $anonfun = { + final override def applyOrElse[A1 >: Nothing <: Int, B1 >: Int <: Any](x$1: A1, default: A1 => B1): B1 = (x$1: A1 @unchecked) match { + final def isDefinedAt(x$1: Int): Boolean = (x$1: Int @unchecked) match {
* / Removing actors-migration from main repository so it can live on elsewhere.Josh Suereth2012-10-3026-1579/+0
|/ | | | | | | * Removes actors-migration hooks from partest * Removes actors-migration code * removes actors-migration tests * removes actors-migration distribution packaging.
* Merge pull request #1519 from paulp/no-product-nJosh Suereth2012-10-244-71/+72
|\ | | | | Disabled generation of _1, _2, etc. methods.
| * Disabled generation of _1, _2, etc. methods.Paul Phillips2012-10-224-71/+72
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | This was part of the introduction of ProductN, which had to go back into pandora's box because of issues with cycles during typing. These should have been reverted along with it.
* | Merge pull request #1507 from retronym/ticket/6526Josh Suereth2012-10-242-0/+57
|\ \ | | | | | | SI-6526 Tail call elimination should descend deeper.
| * | SI-6526 Additional test case.Jason Zaugg2012-10-222-1/+9
| | |
| * | SI-6526 Tail call elimination should descend deeper.Jason Zaugg2012-10-172-0/+49
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | It wasn't traversing into Select nodes nor into the receiver of a tail call.
* | | Fix SI-6552, regression with self types.Paul Phillips2012-10-211-0/+8
| |/ |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In 6eb55d4b7a we put in a remedy for an old issue SI-4560 which had accumulated a number of sketchy partial remedies which carried no tests to illustrate their necessity. Looks like at least one of those was doing something useful. Here's to reversion-reversion. This reverts commit c8bdf199, which itself reverted cb4fd6582.
* | Merge pull request #1509 from paulp/issue/6537Josh Suereth2012-10-204-3/+25
|\ \ | | | | | | Fix for SI-6537, inaccurate unchecked warning.
| * | Fix for SI-6537, inaccurate unchecked warning.Paul Phillips2012-10-184-3/+25
| |/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | I found a more direct expression of the unchecked logic, which should be much easier for others to verify. But the bug being fixed here is that the unchecked checking happens too early, and the sealed children of a symbol are not yet visible if it is being simultaneously compiled.
* / avoid single-art assert where harmful in duration-tckRoland2012-10-181-4/+7
|/
* SI-6509 Correct @template ownersVlad Ureche2012-10-113-0/+55
|
* SI-6155 Scaladoc @template diagrmsVlad Ureche2012-10-113-0/+47
|
* SI-6501 Scaladoc will correctly link to @templatedVlad Ureche2012-10-112-1/+7
| | | | members
* SI-6495 Scaladoc will pick up group from ownerVlad Ureche2012-10-111-43/+51
|
* SI-6487 Scaladoc can link to inner classesVlad Ureche2012-10-112-2/+11
|
* Merge pull request #1487 from dragos/issue/fix-6505Josh Suereth2012-10-111-0/+33
|\ | | | | Fixed SI-6505. Respond to ask calls by immediate failure after compiler shutdown.
| * Fixed SI-6505. Respond to ask calls by immediate failure even after compiler ↵Iulian Dragos2012-10-101-0/+33
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | shutdown. When the compiler is asked to shutdown, it may still have items on the working queue, and more can be added by clients in other thread that don't *know* the compiler is down yet. These requests were never serviced, leading to deadlocks or timeouts. review by @odersky, @hubertp
* | Fix for SI-6499, regression in type inference.Paul Phillips2012-10-101-0/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | I can't do any better than a reproduced comment: For some reason which is still a bit fuzzy, we must let Nothing through as a lower bound despite the fact that Nothing is always a lower bound. My current supposition is that the side-effecting type constraint accumulation mechanism depends on these subtype tests being performed to make forward progress when there are mutally recursive type vars. See pos/t6367 and pos/t6499 for the competing test cases.
* | Merge pull request #1483 from gkossakowski/SI-6440Josh Suereth2012-10-102-0/+8
|\ \ | | | | | | SI-6440: Revert change to `TraversableLike.filterNot`
| * | SI-6440: Revert change to `TraversableLike.filterNot`Grzegorz Kossakowski2012-10-092-0/+8
| |/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit df9f470f14262b9b1002f022c2620d8c38835805 introduced a change to `TraversableLike.filterNot` which broke Stream implementation that does override `filter` implementation but does not override `filterNot` implementation. This shows clearly that reusing code for strict and non-strict collections is very problematic. Added a test-case covering this problem. Closes SI-6440. Review by @retronym.
* | Merge pull request #1471 from retronym/ticket/6483Josh Suereth2012-10-092-0/+33
|\ \ | | | | | | SI-6483 Prohibit super[T] references in value classes.
| * | SI-6483 Prohibit super[T] references in value classes.Jason Zaugg2012-10-072-0/+33
| | | | | | | | | | | | This seems the safest course of action for 2.10.0.
* | | Merge pull request #1458 from scalamacros/pullrequest/reflectionJosh Suereth2012-10-094-4/+16
|\ \ \ | |_|/ |/| | Another reflection bomb
| * | removes EmptyTermName and EmptyTypeNameEugene Burmako2012-10-031-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | We have nme.EMPTY and tpnme.EMPTY for that.
| * | renames macros.TypeError to TypecheckExceptionEugene Burmako2012-10-031-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Again, this is not a fatal error, so it should end with an Error, and it should subclass not Throwable, but Exception. Also moved the exception outside the cake to simplify error handling, along the same lines of what've been done for parsing and reification exceptions.
| * | turns on documentation of scala.reflect.runtimeEugene Burmako2012-10-032-2/+14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We definitely need to document scala.reflect.runtime.universe, therefore adding scala.reflect.runtime to skipPackages was a mistake. But then we need to make a bunch of internal classes private to reflect or to scala. Not very pretty, but it works.
* | | Merge pull request #1442 from adriaanm/ticket-6215Grzegorz Kossakowski2012-10-082-8/+9
|\ \ \ | | | | | | | | SI-6215 Fix compiler crash on private method in value class
| * | | SI-6215 Fix compiler crash on private method in value classMartin Odersky2012-10-022-8/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Fixes the problem with private defs in value classes by moving the $extension after the name proper rather than before. The previous scheme did not commute with makeNonPrivate: I.e. if -ext-> is "generate extension name" and -mnp-> is "make not private" we did get for method foo in value class Foo: foo -ext-> extension$foo -mnp-> Foo$$extension$foo but foo -mnp-> Foo$$foo -ext-> extension$Foo$$foo With the change both variations give the same name: foo -ext-> foo$extension -mnp-> Foo$$foo$extension but foo -mnp-> Foo$$foo -ext-> Foo$$foo$extension
* | | | SI-6485 stops creating extmethods for macrosEugene Burmako2012-10-083-0/+20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Macros don't correspond to bytecode-level methods, therefore there's no need to undergo any transformations past typer.
* | | | MethodSymbol.params => MethodSymbol.paramssEugene Burmako2012-10-073-12/+12
| |_|/ |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This matter was discussed at scala-internals: http://groups.google.com/group/scala-internals/browse_thread/thread/6414d200cf31c357 And I am convinced with Paul's argument: consistency of the convention is very important.
* | | Merge pull request #1455 from scalamacros/topic/manifestsJosh Suereth2012-10-054-38/+18
|\ \ \ | | | | | | | | undeprecates manifests for 2.10.0
| * | | undeprecates manifests for 2.10.0Eugene Burmako2012-10-034-38/+18
| | |/ | |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Since scala-reflect.jar is going to be declared experimental for 2.10.0, it doesn't make sense to deprecate manifests in favor of type tags. Class manifests, however, ARE deprecated for class tags, because class tags don't require scala-reflect.jar and are generated independently of type tags.
* | | Merge pull request #1451 from gkossakowski/SI-6451Grzegorz Kossakowski2012-10-042-64/+64
|\ \ \ | |/ / |/| | SI-6451: Rename classes in `unchecked-abstract.scala` test.