| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
| |
Macros don't correspond to bytecode-level methods, therefore
there's no need to undergo any transformations past typer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This matter was discussed at scala-internals:
http://groups.google.com/group/scala-internals/browse_thread/thread/6414d200cf31c357
And I am convinced with Paul's argument: consistency of the convention
is very important.
|
|\
| |
| | |
undeprecates manifests for 2.10.0
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Since scala-reflect.jar is going to be declared experimental for 2.10.0,
it doesn't make sense to deprecate manifests in favor of type tags.
Class manifests, however, ARE deprecated for class tags, because class tags
don't require scala-reflect.jar and are generated independently of type tags.
|
|\ \
| |/
|/| |
SI-6451: Rename classes in `unchecked-abstract.scala` test.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
As reported Miguel, `Con` is problematic name of a class on Windows
and makes this test to fail. Renamed classes to something else which
hopefully make Windows build happy again.
Closes SI-6451.
Review by @magarciaEPFL or @paulp.
|
|\ \
| | |
| | | |
AnyVal/value classes restrictions
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Nested objects, classes and lazy vals are disallowed at any
nesting level in value classes; e.g. lazy vals local to a
method defined in a value class. There are still allowed in
universal traits.
This is a temporary, implementation restriction that is planned
to be addressed in future releases of Scala. Error messages has
been updated to communicate that intent.
Moved tests for SI-5582 and SI-6408 to pending folder. They have
to stay there until implementation restrictions are addressed.
Closes SI-6408 and SI-6432.
Review by @odersky, @harrah and @adriaanm.
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Fixed problem reported in comment, where inner classes of value classe caused a compiler crash.
|
| |/
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
and brought compiler in line with them. One thing we can accept IMO are nested
classes (nested objects are still a problem). In fact, it makes no sense to
exclude nested classes from value classes but not from universal traits. A class
nested in universal trait will becomes a class nested in a value class by
inheritance. Note that the reflection library already contains a universal trait
with a nested class (IndexedSeqLike), so we should accept them if we can.
|
|\ \
| |/
|/| |
SI-6436 Handle ambiguous string processors
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Before, we got in an inifinite loop by chasing
the error typed result of adaptToMemberWithArgs.
One point of befuddlement remains: why did t6436 and t6436b
behave differently before this change?
|
|\ \
| | |
| | | |
SI-6442 - Add ActorDSL object for actor migration kit
|
| |/
| |
| |
| | |
Removes MigrationSystem, since ActorDSL replaces it.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This covers the situation which broke in 5c5e8d4dcd,
reverted in the previous commit.
|
|/
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 5c5e8d4dcd151a6e2bf9e7c259c618b9b4eff00f.
|
|\
| |
| | |
a fork of isValueType and isNonValueType
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
only affects runtime reflection, because Symbol.typeSignature
is only defined in the reflection API. the rest of the compiler
uses Symbol.info instead.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
There's some very sketchy behavior visible - I'm printing a
method signature and getting this:
[B <: <?>, That <: <?>](f: <?>)(implicit cbf: <?>)That
But there's no exposed way to force the info. Am I
supposed to call isSealed or something?
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Restrictions regarding how non-value types can be used have
generally not been enforced explicitly, depending instead on
the fact that the compiler wouldn't attempt to use them in
strange ways like offering a method type as a type argument.
Since users can now create most types from scratch, it has
become important to enforce the restrictions in a more
direct fashion.
This was a lot harder than it probably should have been
because there are so many types which go unmentioned by the
specification. Hopefully a useful exercise in any case.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
If we're reifying non-value types (e.g. MethodTypes), we can't use them
as type arguments for TypeTag/WeakTypeTag factory methods, otherwise
the macro expansion won't typecheck:
http://groups.google.com/group/scala-internals/browse_thread/thread/2d7bb85bfcdb2e2
This situation is impossible if one uses only reify and type tags, but
c.reifyTree and c.reifyType exposes in the macro API let anyone feed
anything into the reifier.
Therefore I now check the tpe that is about to be used in TypeApply
wrapping TypeTag/WeakTypeTag factory methods and replace it with AnyTpe
if it doesn't fit.
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| |/
|/| |
SI-6380 Add @throws[Exception]
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This change allows an additional notation of the @throws annotation:
Old-style: @throws(classOf[Exception])
New-style: @throws[Exception]
The optional String argument moves @throws in line with @deprecated,
@migration, etc. and prevents confusion caused by the default inheritance
of ScalaDoc comments and the non-inheritance of annotations.
Before: /** This method does ...
* @throws IllegalArgumentException if `a` is less than 0. */
@throws(classOf[IllegalArgumentException])
def foo(a: Int) = ...
Now: /** This method does ... */
@throws[IllegalArgumentException]("if `a` is less than 0")
def foo(a: Int) = ...
ScalaDoc @throws tags remain supported for cases where documentation of
thrown exceptions is needed, but are not supposed to be added to the
exception attribute of the class file.
In this commit the necessary compiler support is added.
The code to extract exceptions from annotations is now shared instead
of being duplicated all over the place.
The change is completely source and binary compatible, except that the code
is now enforcing that the type thrown is a subtype of Throwable as mandated
by the JVM spec instead of allowing something like @throws(classOf[String]).
Not in this commit:
- ScalaDoc support to add the String argument to ScalaDoc's exception list
- Adaption of the library
|
|\ \
| | |
| | | |
Much better unchecked warnings.
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
When there is a test called pos/t1107.scala and also a test
called pos/t1107, it is bad.
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
I will again defer to a comment.
/** Given classes A and B, can it be shown that nothing which is
* an A will ever be a subclass of something which is a B? This
* entails not only showing that !(A isSubClass B) but that the
* same is true of all their subclasses. Restated for symmetry:
* the same value cannot be a member of both A and B.
*
* 1) A must not be a subclass of B, nor B of A (the trivial check)
* 2) One of A or B must be completely knowable (see isKnowable)
* 3) Assuming A is knowable, the proposition is true if
* !(A' isSubClass B) for all A', where A' is a subclass of A.
*
* Due to symmetry, the last condition applies as well in reverse.
*/
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
I had this in before, then removed it since it is sometimes
redundant with an error message later issued by the pattern
matcher (e.g. scrutinee is incompatible with pattern type.)
However it also catches a lot of cases which are not errors,
so I think the modest redundancy is tolerable for now.
I also enhanced the logic for recognizing impossible
type tests, taking sealedness into account.
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Closes SI-6275, SI-5762.
The comment says is better than I can.
/** On pattern matcher checkability:
*
* Consider a pattern match of this form: (x: X) match { case _: P => }
*
* There are four possibilities to consider:
* [P1] X will always conform to P
* [P2] x will never conform to P
* [P3] X <: P if some runtime test is true
* [P4] X cannot be checked against P
*
* The first two cases correspond to those when there is enough static
* information to say X <: P or that !(X <: P) for all X and P.
* The fourth case includes unknown abstract types or structural
* refinements appearing within a pattern.
*
* The third case is the interesting one. We designate another type, XR,
* which is essentially the intersection of X and |P|, where |P| is
* the erasure of P. If XR <: P, then no warning is emitted.
*
* Examples of how this info is put to use:
* sealed trait A[T] ; class B[T] extends A[T]
* def f(x: B[Int]) = x match { case _: A[Int] if true => }
* def g(x: A[Int]) = x match { case _: B[Int] => }
*
* `f` requires no warning because X=B[Int], P=A[Int], and B[Int] <:< A[Int].
* `g` requires no warning because X=A[Int], P=B[Int], XR=B[Int], and B[Int] <:< B[Int].
* XR=B[Int] because a value of type A[Int] which is tested to be a B can
* only be a B[Int], due to the definition of B (B[T] extends A[T].)
*
* This is something like asSeenFrom, only rather than asking what a type looks
* like from the point of view of one of its base classes, we ask what it looks
* like from the point of view of one of its subclasses.
*/
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | | |
SI-5314 - CPS transform of return statement fails (resubmission of #987)
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Add `adaptTypeOfReturn` hook to `AnnotationCheckers`.
Move adaptation of types of return expressions from `addAnnotations`
to `typedReturn` via `adaptTypeOfReturn` hook.
This resolves an inconsistency where previously types could have
a plus marker without additional CPS annotations. This also adds
additional test cases.
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
This reverts commit 8d020fab9758ced93eb18fa51c906b95ec104aed.
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Disabled warnings that no longer apply because of tail returns.
Add several test cases.
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Other fixes:
- remove CPSUtils.allCPSMethods
- add clarifying comment about adding a plus marker to a return expression
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Enable return expressions in CPS code if they are in tail position. Note that tail returns are
only removed in methods that do not call `shift` or `reset` (otherwise, an error is reported).
Addresses the issues pointed out in a previous pull request:
https://github.com/scala/scala/pull/720
- Addresses all issues mentioned here:
https://github.com/scala/scala/pull/720#issuecomment-6429705
- Move transformation methods to SelectiveANFTransform.scala:
https://github.com/scala/scala/pull/720#commitcomment-1477497
- Do not keep a list of tail returns.
Tests:
- continuations-neg/t5314-missing-result-type.scala
- continuations-neg/t5314-type-error.scala
- continuations-neg/t5314-npe.scala
- continuations-neg/t5314-return-reset.scala
- continuations-run/t5314.scala
- continuations-run/t5314-2.scala
- continuations-run/t5314-3.scala
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Scaladoc-driven cleanup for the win
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
By turning them from abstract types into full-fledged traits
implemented by our internal Run and CompilationUnit.
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
It was useful to pretend that SourceFile isn't a part of the API,
when it's physical location was in scala-compiler.jar.
Afterwards Position and SourceFile have been moved to scala-reflect.jar,
and (what's more important) scala-reflect.jar gained experimental status,
meaning that we're not bound by backward compatibility in 2.10.0.
Therefore I'd say we should expose a full-fledged SourceFile in Position.source
(just as we do for Symbol.associatedFile) and later find out how to strip down
its interface to something suitable for public consumption.
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
libraryClassLoader can be derived from currentClassPath
currentMacro can be trivially derived from macroApplication
Backend-detection methods forXXX (as in forJVM or forScaladoc)
might be useful, but current design of this API is not future-proof.
I'm not able to come up with a better design on the spot, so
let's remove this functionality for the moment.
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
It was an interesting idea to give macro developers control over front ends,
but it hasn't given any visible results.
To the contrast, front ends have proven useful for toolboxes to easily control
what errors get printed where.
Therefore I'm moving front ends to scala-compiler.jar to clean up the API.
Yay for scaladoc-driven development!
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
The name looks weird in the scaladoc overview panel,
so I decided to do a last-minute rename.
|
|\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | | |
SI-6412 alleviates leaks in toolboxes, attempt #2
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Turns importer caches into fully weak hash maps, and also applies
manual cleanup to toolboxes every time they are used.
It's not enough, because reflection-mem-typecheck test is still leaking
at a rate of ~100kb per typecheck, but it's much better than it was before.
We'll fix the rest later, after 2.10.0-final.
For more information, see https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-6412 and
http://groups.google.com/group/scala-internals/browse_thread/thread/eabcf3d406dab8b2
In comparison with https://github.com/scala/scala/commit/b403c1d,
the original commit that implemented the fix, this one doesn't crash tests.
The problem with the original commit was that it called tryFixup() before
updating the cache, leading to stack overflows.
|
|/ / / /
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
And also explicitly specifies -d in a test where I forgot to do that.
Double checking never hurts.
|
|\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | | |
SI-6277 fix for isXXX methods in reflection
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
`Symbol.getFlag`, 'Symbol.hasFlag`, `Symbol.hasAllFlags`, `Symbol.annotations`
and `Symbol.privateWithin` now trigger automatic initialization of symbols
if they are used in a runtime reflection universe and some other conditions
are met (see `Symbol.needsInitialize` for details).
As the performance testing in https://github.com/scala/scala/pull/1380 shows,
this commit introduces a ~2% performance regression of compilation speed.
Unfortunately all known solutions to the bug at hand (A, B & C - all of those)
introduce perf regressions (see the pull request linked above for details).
However we're under severe time pressure, so there's no more time to explore.
Therefore I suggest this is reasonable to accept this performance hit,
because we've just gained 6% from removing scala.reflect.base,
and even before that we were well within our performance goal for 2.10.0-final.
|
|\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
SI-6410 add test cases.
|