| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|\
| |
| | |
Improves name-based patmat.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The advent of the named based pattern matcher brought with it
a change in the way we determine the type of the value in the
"match monad". We used to take the base type to `Option` or `Seq`
(guided by the method name in `unapply` vs `unapplySeq`), and
simply use the type argument.
Name-based patmat, instead, uses the result type of methods in the
type. For example, the element type of an Option-like extractor
result is given by the result type of the no-args `get` method.
This approach, however, swiftly runs aground when navigating the
existential atolls. Here's why:
scala> class F[_]
defined class F
scala> val tp = typeOf[Some[F[X]] forSome { type X }]
warning: there were 1 feature warning(s); re-run with -feature for details
tp: $r.intp.global.Type = scala.this.Some[F[X]] forSome { type X }
scala> tp.baseType(typeOf[Option[_]].typeSymbol).typeArgs.head
res10: $r.intp.global.Type = F[X] forSome { type X }
scala> tp.memberType(tp.member(nme.get)).finalResultType
res11: $r.intp.global.Type = F[X]
`res10` corresponds to 2.10.x approach in `matchMonadResult`.
`res11` corresponds to the new approach in `resultOfMatchingMethod`.
The last result is not wrapped by the existential type. This results
in errors like (shown under -Ydebug to turn un accurate printing of
skolems):
error: error during expansion of this match (this is a scalac bug).
The underlying error was: type mismatch;
found : _$1&0 where type _$1&0
required: _$1
(0: Any) match {
^
one error found
This commit addresses the regression in 2.10.x compatible extractors
by using the 2.10 approach for them.
The residual problem is shown in the enclosed pending test.
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Test case for SI-8045, fixed by the preceding commits.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Name-based pattern matcher needed some hardening against
unapply methods with the right name but wrong types. Only
isEmpty methods which return Boolean are acceptable.
Catching it directly rather than indirectly also allowed
for better error messages.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This emerges from a recent attempt to eliminate pattern matcher
related duplication and to bake the scalac-independent logic
out of it. I had in mind something a lot cleaner, but it was
a whole lot of work to get it here and I can take it no further.
Key file to admire is PatternExpander.scala, which should
provide a basis for some separation of concerns.
The bugs addressed are a CCE involving Tuple1 and an imprecise
warning regarding multiple pattern crushing.
Editorial: auto-tupling unapply results was a terrible idea which
should never have escaped from the crib. It is tantamount to
purposely throwing type safety down the toilet in the very place
where people need type safety the most. See SI-6111 and SI-6675 for
some other comments.
|
|\ \
| | |
| | | |
junit test
|
| | | |
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | | |
SI-8046 BaseTypeSeq fixes with aliases
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
We can only compute the base type sequence (BTS) of a `TypeRef` by
element-wise transforming the BTS of the referenced symbol if
there are no abstract types in its BTS type symbols.
In the now-working test case, `pos/t8046.scala`, the difference
between the old and new calculation of the BTS is:
this = Three.this.Alias[Int]
sym.info.baseTypeSeq = BTS(One.this.Op[A],Any)
mapped BTS = BTS(Three.this.Op[Int],Any)
full BTS = BTS(Three.this.Op[Int],Int => Int,Object,Any)
The change to account for PolyType in ArgsTypeRef#transform is now
needed to avoid the full BTS of:
BTS(Three.this.Op[A],A => A,Object,Any)
Interestingly, everything actually works without that change.
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Not solved with base type dealiasing
|
| | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \
| |_|/ /
|/| | | |
SI-2066 Plug a soundness hole higher order type params, overriding
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
PolyType-s parameterized by higher order type parameters (HOTPs)
should only be relatable with <:< or =:= if the variances of their
type parameters line up. This is only enforced for HOTPs defined in
method type arguments.
Invariant type parameters subsume variant ones. Concretely, as
described by @S11001001:
> A method taking [F[_]] can implement a method taking [F[+_]].
> Likewise, a method taking [F[_[+_]]] can implement a method
> taking [F[_[_]]], as with [F[_[_[_]]]] implementing [F[_[_[+_]]]],
> and so on, the variance subsumption flipping at each step.
>
> This is just the opposite of the variance for passing type
> parameters to either instantiate types or call methods; a F[+_]
> is a suitable F[_]-argument, a F[_[_]] a suitable F[_[+_]]-argument,
> and so on.
>
> All of the above rules can be duplicated for contravariant positions
> by substituting - for +. Also, something similar happens for
> weakening/strengthening bounds, I believe.
These cases are tested in the `// okay` lines in `neg/t2066.scala`.
|
|\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | | |
fixes run/macroPlugins-namerHooks.scala
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Makes run/macroPlugins-namerHooks.scala work equally well on both
Unix and Windows machines.
|
|\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
SI-8131 Move test for reflection thread safety to pending.
|
| |/ / / /
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Examples noted in SI-8131 show that race conditions still abound.
This has been noted twice during pull request validation.
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
This PR (https://github.com/scala/scala/pull/3275#issuecomment-31986434)
demonstrates that the test is flaky.
The disabled test was introduced with the intent of preventing a
regression (here is the commit
https://github.com/scala/scala/commit/ccacb06c4928fd6aebc2c2539d7565cb079dc625).
It looks like there is a race condition when `askTypeAt(pos)` is called
on `implicitly[Foo[A]].foo` where `pos` is matches the end point of the
former expression. The issue is that the returned Tree is unattributed,
which is why the error "No symbol is associated with tree
implicitly[Foo[A]].foo" is reported.
|
|\ \ \ \ \
| |/ / / /
|/| | | | |
Fix SI-7443 Range.sum ignoring Numeric argument and always assuming default 'plus' implementation
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Previously both Range and NumeriRange used formula for sum of elements
of arithmetic series and thus always assumed that provided Numeric is
regular one.
Bug is now fixed by conservatively checking if Numeric is one of
default ones and the formula still holds.
|
|\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Presentation compiler friendliness for macros
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
The presentation compiler is primarily interested in trees that
represent the code that one sees in the IDE, not the expansion of
macros.
This commit continues to expand macros, but adds a hook in which
the presentation compiler discards the expansion, retaining instead
the expandee. The expandee is attributed with the type of the
expansion, which allows white box macros to work. In addition,
any domain specific errors and warnings issued by the macro will
still be reported, as a side-effect of the expansion.
The failing test from the last commit now correctly resolves
hyperlinks in macro arguments.
Related IDE ticket:
https://www.assembla.com/spaces/scala-ide/tickets/1001449#
This facility is configured as follows:
// expand macros as per normal
-Ymacro-expand:normal
// don't expand the macro, takes the place of -Ymacro-no-expand
-Ymacro-expand:none
// expand macros to compute type and emit warnings,
// but retain expandee. Set automatically be the presentation
// compiler
-Ymacro-expand:discard
This leaves to door ajar for a new option:
// Don't expand blackbox macros; expand whitebox
// but retain expandee
-Ymacro-expand:discard-whitebox-only
The existing test for SI-6812 has been duplicated. One copy exercises
the now-deprecated -Ymacro-no-expand, and the other uses the new
option.
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
- Replace NoPosition with the focus of the macro application
- Focus all range positions, for example, those of spliced arguments
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Currently, the presentation compiler sees the expansion of macros;
this no longer contains the trees corresponding to the macro arguments,
and hyperlink requests result incorrect results.
https://www.assembla.com/spaces/scala-ide/tickets/1001449#
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
ExistentialTypeTree.whereClauses are now MemberDefs
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Today’s flight back to Lausanne wasn’t as productive as the recent flight
to Minsk (https://github.com/scala/scala/pull/3305), but I noticed
one minor thingie: ExistentialTypeTree had an imprecise type specified
for its whereClauses. This is now fixed.
I didn’t increment PickleFormat.*Version numbers, because this change
introduces only a miniscule incompatibility with what would have been
a meaningless and most likely crash-inducing pickle anyway.
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Fix broken 'Symbol-handling code in CleanUp
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Looks like the transformation did never happen because the pattern
failed to match. Why did the pattern fail to match? Because the
Symbol.apply we see in the tree claims to be a method while
Symbol_apply defined in Definitions wants to be a value.
This issue was caused because nonPrivateMember starts spitting out
overloaded symbols after erasure.
This issue has been fixed in the earlier commit, so what happens in
this commit is adding tests and fixing documentation.
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|/ / / / /
|/| | | | | | | |
Issue/si 4287
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
* Default arguments are always retained on the <init> method (i.e.,
the class' constructor). Therefore, when the <init> parameters are
created, we need to use `duplicateAndKeepPositions` to make sure that
if a default argument is present, its opaque position is retained as
well. This is necessary because when parameter accessors (i.e.,
`fieldDefs`) are created, all default arguments are discared ( as you
can see in the code, the right-hand-side of a `field` is always an
`EmptyTree`) - see changes in TreeGen.scala
* When constructing the `fieldDefs`, it is important to adapt their
range position to avoid overlappings with the positions of default
arguments. It is worth noting that updating the field's end position
to `vd.rhs.pos.start` would be incorrect, because `askTypeAt(pos)`
could return the incorrect tree when the position is equal to
`vd.rhs.pos.start` (because two nodes including that point position
would exist in the tree, and `CompilerControl.locateTree(pos)` would
return the first tree that includes the passed `pos`). This is why
`1` is subtracted to `vd.rhs.pos.start`. Alternatively, we could have
used `vd.tpt.pos.end` with similar results. However the logic would
have become slightly more complex as we would need to handle the case
where `vd.tpt` doesn't have a range position (for instance, this can
happen if `-Yinfer-argument-types` is enabled). Therefore, subtracting
`1` from `vd.rhs.pos.start` seemed the cleanest solution at the
moment. - see changes in TreeGen.scala.
* If the synthetic constructor contains trees with an opaque range
position (see point above), it must have a transparent position.
This can only happen if the constructor's parameters' positions are
considered, which is why we are now passing `vparamss1` to
`wrappingPos` - see changes in TreeGen.scala.
* The derived primary constructor should have a transparent position
as it may contain trees with an opaque range position. Hence, the
`primaryCtor` position is considered for computing the position of the
derived constructor - see change in Typers.scala.
Finally, below follows the printing of the tree for test t4287, which
you should compare with the one attached with the previous commit
message:
```
[[syntax trees at end of typer]] // Foo.scala
[0:63]package [0:0]<empty> {
[0:37]class Baz extends [9:37][39]scala.AnyRef {
[10:20]<paramaccessor> private[this] val f: [14]Int = _;
[14]<stable> <accessor> <paramaccessor> def f: [14]Int = [14][14]Baz.this.f;
<10:31>def <init>(<10:31>f: [17]<type: [17]scala.Int> = [23:31]B.a): [9]Baz = <10:31>{
<10:31><10:31><10:31>Baz.super.<init>();
<10:31>()
}
};
[6]<synthetic> object Baz extends [6][6]AnyRef {
[6]def <init>(): [9]Baz.type = [6]{
[6][6][6]Baz.super.<init>();
[9]()
};
[14]<synthetic> def <init>$default$1: [14]Int = [30]B.a
};
[39:63]object B extends [48:63][63]scala.AnyRef {
[63]def <init>(): [48]B.type = [63]{
[63][63][63]B.super.<init>();
[48]()
};
[52:61]private[this] val a: [56]Int = [60:61]2;
[56]<stable> <accessor> def a: [56]Int = [56][56]B.this.a
}
}
```
You should notice that the default arg of `Baz` constructor now has a
range position. And that explains why the associated test now returns
the right tree when asking hyperlinking at the location of the default
argument.
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
As demonstrated by the attached test, hyperlinking on constructor's
default arg doesn't work (the returned tree is the parameter tree,
i.e., `f`, which is of course wrong).
Printing the tree reveals the issue:
``
[[syntax trees at end of typer]] // Foo.scala
[0:63]package [0:0]<empty> {
[0:37]class Baz extends [9:37][39]scala.AnyRef {
[10:31]<paramaccessor> private[this] val f: [14]Int = _;
[14]<stable> <accessor> <paramaccessor> def f: [14]Int = [14][14]Baz.this.f;
[39]def <init>([14]f: [17]<type: [17]scala.Int> = [30]B.a): [9]Baz = [39]{
[39][39][39]Baz.super.<init>();
[9]()
}
};
[6]<synthetic> object Baz extends [6][6]AnyRef {
[6]def <init>(): [9]Baz.type = [6]{
[6][6][6]Baz.super.<init>();
[9]()
};
[14]<synthetic> def <init>$default$1: [14]Int = [30]B.a
};
[39:63]object B extends [48:63][63]scala.AnyRef {
[63]def <init>(): [48]B.type = [63]{
[63][63][63]B.super.<init>();
[48]()
};
[52:61]private[this] val a: [56]Int = [60:61]2;
[56]<stable> <accessor> def a: [56]Int = [56][56]B.this.a
}
}
``
In short, the default argument in `<init>` (the constructor) has an
offset position, while we would expect it to have a range position.
Therefore, when locating a tree for any position between (start=) 10
and (end=) 31, the paramaccessor tree `f` is returned.
The next commit will correct the problem.
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
This test was inspired by `test/files/run/t5603`, whose output (.check file)
will need to be updated in the upcoming commit that fixes SI-4287, because
the positions associated to the tree have slightly changed.
The additional test should demonstrate that the change in positions isn't
relevant, and it doesn't affect functionality. In fact, hyperlinking to a
constructor's argument work as expected before and after fixing SI-4287.
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Added test to the presentation compiler regression suite to exercise
hyperlinking on context bounds.
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
new hooks in AnalyzerPlugins to enable macro experimentation
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Interestingly enough, despite of the implementation surface being
quite noticeable, it is enough to hijack just `enterSym` and typechecking
of stats for packages, templates and blocks in order to enable macro annotations.
That and `ensureCompanionObject`, which I couldn't abstract away so far.
An architectural note: given that a hooked method is called `X`,
there are two implementations of this method. `pluginsX` is defined in
AnalyzerPlugins.scala and lets macro plugins customize `X`.
`standardX` is defined next to `X` and provides a default implementation.
Finally `X` is changed to trivially forward to `pluginsX`.
Existing and future callers of `X` now can be completely oblivious of the
introduced hooks, because calls to `X` will continue working and will be
correctly hooked. This makes the infrastructure more robust.
The only downside is that in case when a macro plugin wants to call
into the default implementation, it needs to call `standardX`, because
`X` will lead to a stack overflow. However, in my opinion this not a big
problem, because such failures are load and clear + for every `pluginsX`
we actually provide documentation that says what is its standard impl is.
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
This is the first of two commits that enable hooks necessary to implement
macro annotations in an honest, hackless compiler plugin.
This particular commit turns certain helpers into public methods. Of course,
there is a probability that with the evolution of macro paradise, I will need
more helper methods, and those will have to be called via reflection, but
at least for now it's nice to have a reflection-less plugin :)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Macro defs are linked to macro impls by the virtue of MacroImplBinding
structures that are persisted between compilation runs serialized within
instances of macroImpl annotations.
Along with the evolution of our macro engine, we sometimes have to evolve
the format of MacroImplBinding, which means that it has to be versioned.
Version mismatches are checked upon every macro expansion, ensuring that
macros that we expand were compiled with exactly the same version of the
macro engine that we’re running.
That’s all really cool apart from the fact that version mismatches result
in aborting the entire compilation with an obscure message without giving
a hint about the culprits.
This commit improves the situation by providing pretty per-expansion
compilation errors that tell the programmer what macro expansions are
at fault and what macro engines were used to compile them.
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Back then, when we needed separate macro expanders for both applications
and unapplications, it made sense to have two different methods that
do macro expansions.
However, after @paulp’s upgrade of the pattern matching engine, we no longer
need a dedicated expander for unapply, so I’m removing it and renaming
`macroExpandApply` to just `macroExpand`.
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
SI-8120 Avoid tree sharing when typechecking patmat anon functions
|
| | |_|_|/ / / / /
| |/| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
When typechecking an empty selector `Match` corresponding to:
{ case ... => ... }: (A => B)
We wrap it in a `Function` and typecheck:
(x$1 => x$1 match { case ... => ... })
Local symbols in this expression (representing values bound by
the pattern, or just definitions in the body or guard) are then
owned by the anonymous function's symbol.
However, if we ever discard this `Function` and start anew with
the empty selector match, as happens during the fallback to
use a view on the receiver in `tryTypedApply`, we found that we
had mutated the cases of the original tree, and allowed orphaned
local symbols to escape into the compiler pipeline.
This commit uses duplicated trees for the the cases in the synthetic
`Match` to avoid this problem.
`duplicateAndKeepPositions` is used to preserve range positions;
without this scala-refactoring PrettyPrinterTest fails.
`Tree#duplicate` uses offset positions in the copied tree, which
is appropriate when both the original and the copy are going to end up
in the final tree.
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Fix (postfix abs for -0.0)
|
| |/ / / / / / / /
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
SI-8102 points out that -0.0.abs returns -0.0 (in error). The same issue
exists for -0.0f. This commit fixes the issue for both by delegating to
math.abs.
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Improved testing framework for sets and maps.
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Switched to JUnit testing framework for sets and maps. They now test
broadly against each other for consistency. Tests for mutable.AnyRefMap
and mutable.LongMap are folded in here (originals removed). There is still
lots of redundancy with other tests that has not been removed.
This framework is also designed to enable more robust testing of changes to
implementations of sets and maps; although it's still quite possible to get
a broken implementation through, these tests should make it harder to get
the fundamentals wrong.
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Resolves SI-7837, failure in quickSort.
|
| | |_|_|_|/ / / / /
| |/| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
because the code uses '==' instead of 'equiv'
== instead of equiv (from Ordering) was used by mistake. Fixed.
Also created a test to make sure that == is not used by throwing an exception if it is (as suggested by Jason).
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|/ / / / / / /
|/| | | | | | | | | |
awakens default getter synthesis from the untyper nightmare
|
| | |/ / / / / / /
| |/| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Our happy little macro paradise is regularly invaded by resetAllAttrs,
the bane of all macros and typers. It’s so ruthless and devastating that
we’ve been long scheming to hack something really cool and to one day
defeat it.
Today we make the first step towards the happy future. Today we overthrow
the UnTyper, resetAllAttrs’s elder brother that rules in the kingdoms of
GetterLand and CaseClassia, and banish him from the land of getters.
In the name of what’s good and meta, let’s band together and completely
drive him away in a subsequent pull request!
To put it in a nutshell, instead of using untyper on a DefDef to do
default getter synthesis, the commit duplicates the DefDef and does
resetLocalAttrs on it.
As default getter synthesis proceeds with figuring out type and value
parameters for the getter, then its tpt and finally its rhs, the commit
destructures the duplicated DefDef and then assembles the default getter
from the destructured parts instead of doing copyUntyped/copyUntypedInvariant
on the original DefDef.
I would say the test coverage is pretty good, as I had to figure out
3 or 4 test failures before I got to the stage when everything worked.
Iirc it tests pretty exotic stuff like polymorphic default parameters
in both second and third parameter lists, so it looks like we're pretty
good in this department.
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
SI-7880 Fix infinite loop in ResizableArray#ensureSize
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
This issue was triggered for values greater than Int.MaxValue/2, which
caused the computation of the new array size to overflow and become
negative, leading to an infinite loop.
|