diff options
| author | JerryLead <JerryLead@163.com> | 2014-12-02 17:08:02 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ankur Dave <ankurdave@gmail.com> | 2014-12-02 17:11:05 -0800 |
| commit | f1859fc189d9657381fbe82795420de34cad4025 (patch) | |
| tree | 194fe39a97b77e8c5f3060001081795f014a3ce4 /.gitattributes | |
| parent | 5e026a3e647f077cf9aef15d80cd1fdfa5aad3cd (diff) | |
| download | spark-f1859fc189d9657381fbe82795420de34cad4025.tar.gz spark-f1859fc189d9657381fbe82795420de34cad4025.tar.bz2 spark-f1859fc189d9657381fbe82795420de34cad4025.zip | |
[SPARK-4672][GraphX]Perform checkpoint() on PartitionsRDD to shorten the lineage
The related JIRA is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-4672
Iterative GraphX applications always have long lineage, while checkpoint() on EdgeRDD and VertexRDD themselves cannot shorten the lineage. In contrast, if we perform checkpoint() on their ParitionsRDD, the long lineage can be cut off. Moreover, the existing operations such as cache() in this code is performed on the PartitionsRDD, so checkpoint() should do the same way. More details and explanation can be found in the JIRA.
Author: JerryLead <JerryLead@163.com>
Author: Lijie Xu <csxulijie@gmail.com>
Closes #3549 from JerryLead/my_graphX_checkpoint and squashes the following commits:
d1aa8d8 [JerryLead] Perform checkpoint() on PartitionsRDD not VertexRDD and EdgeRDD themselves
ff08ed4 [JerryLead] Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/apache/spark
c0169da [JerryLead] Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/apache/spark
52799e3 [Lijie Xu] Merge pull request #1 from apache/master
(cherry picked from commit fc0a1475ef7c8b33363d88adfe8e8f28def5afc7)
Signed-off-by: Ankur Dave <ankurdave@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to '.gitattributes')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions