[SPARK-12608][STREAMING] Remove submitJobThreadPool since submitJob doesn't create a separate thread to wait for the job result

Before #9264, submitJob would create a separate thread to wait for the job result. `submitJobThreadPool` was a workaround in `ReceiverTracker` to run these waiting-job-result threads. Now #9264 has been merged to master and resolved this blocking issue, `submitJobThreadPool` can be removed now.

Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>

Closes #10560 from zsxwing/remove-submitJobThreadPool.

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/ReceiverTracker.scala b/streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/ReceiverTracker.scala
index 9ddf176aee..678f1dc950 100644
--- a/streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/ReceiverTracker.scala
+++ b/streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/scheduler/ReceiverTracker.scala
@@ -435,10 +435,6 @@ class ReceiverTracker(ssc: StreamingContext, skipReceiverLaunch: Boolean = false
   /** RpcEndpoint to receive messages from the receivers. */
   private class ReceiverTrackerEndpoint(override val rpcEnv: RpcEnv) extends ThreadSafeRpcEndpoint {
 
-    // TODO Remove this thread pool after https://github.com/apache/spark/issues/7385 is merged
-    private val submitJobThreadPool = ExecutionContext.fromExecutorService(
-      ThreadUtils.newDaemonCachedThreadPool("submit-job-thread-pool"))
-
     private val walBatchingThreadPool = ExecutionContext.fromExecutorService(
       ThreadUtils.newDaemonCachedThreadPool("wal-batching-thread-pool"))
 
@@ -610,12 +606,11 @@ class ReceiverTracker(ssc: StreamingContext, skipReceiverLaunch: Boolean = false
             logInfo(s"Restarting Receiver $receiverId")
             self.send(RestartReceiver(receiver))
           }
-      }(submitJobThreadPool)
+      }(ThreadUtils.sameThread)
       logInfo(s"Receiver ${receiver.streamId} started")
     }
 
     override def onStop(): Unit = {
-      submitJobThreadPool.shutdownNow()
       active = false
       walBatchingThreadPool.shutdown()
     }