| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds a new project ` external/kafka-0-10-sql` for Structured Streaming Kafka source.
It's based on the design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/19t2rWe51x7tq2e5AOfrsM9qb8_m7BRuv9fel9i0PqR8/edit?usp=sharing
tdas did most of work and part of them was inspired by koeninger's work.
### Introduction
The Kafka source is a structured streaming data source to poll data from Kafka. The schema of reading data is as follows:
Column | Type
---- | ----
key | binary
value | binary
topic | string
partition | int
offset | long
timestamp | long
timestampType | int
The source can deal with deleting topics. However, the user should make sure there is no Spark job processing the data when deleting a topic.
### Configuration
The user can use `DataStreamReader.option` to set the following configurations.
Kafka Source's options | value | default | meaning
------ | ------- | ------ | -----
startingOffset | ["earliest", "latest"] | "latest" | The start point when a query is started, either "earliest" which is from the earliest offset, or "latest" which is just from the latest offset. Note: This only applies when a new Streaming query is started, and that resuming will always pick up from where the query left off.
failOnDataLost | [true, false] | true | Whether to fail the query when it's possible that data is lost (e.g., topics are deleted, or offsets are out of range). This may be a false alarm. You can disable it when it doesn't work as you expected.
subscribe | A comma-separated list of topics | (none) | The topic list to subscribe. Only one of "subscribe" and "subscribeParttern" options can be specified for Kafka source.
subscribePattern | Java regex string | (none) | The pattern used to subscribe the topic. Only one of "subscribe" and "subscribeParttern" options can be specified for Kafka source.
kafka.consumer.poll.timeoutMs | long | 512 | The timeout in milliseconds to poll data from Kafka in executors
fetchOffset.numRetries | int | 3 | Number of times to retry before giving up fatch Kafka latest offsets.
fetchOffset.retryIntervalMs | long | 10 | milliseconds to wait before retrying to fetch Kafka offsets
Kafka's own configurations can be set via `DataStreamReader.option` with `kafka.` prefix, e.g, `stream.option("kafka.bootstrap.servers", "host:port")`
### Usage
* Subscribe to 1 topic
```Scala
spark
.readStream
.format("kafka")
.option("kafka.bootstrap.servers", "host:port")
.option("subscribe", "topic1")
.load()
```
* Subscribe to multiple topics
```Scala
spark
.readStream
.format("kafka")
.option("kafka.bootstrap.servers", "host:port")
.option("subscribe", "topic1,topic2")
.load()
```
* Subscribe to a pattern
```Scala
spark
.readStream
.format("kafka")
.option("kafka.bootstrap.servers", "host:port")
.option("subscribePattern", "topic.*")
.load()
```
## How was this patch tested?
The new unit tests.
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Author: Shixiong Zhu <zsxwing@gmail.com>
Author: cody koeninger <cody@koeninger.org>
Closes #15102 from zsxwing/kafka-source.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
spark.history.ui.maxApplications
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Return Iterator of applications internally in history server, for consistency and performance. See https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15248 for some back-story.
The code called by and calling HistoryServer.getApplicationList wants an Iterator, but this method materializes an Iterable, which potentially causes a performance problem. It's simpler too to make this internal method also pass through an Iterator.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes #15321 from srowen/SPARK-17671.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
limitation of Windows
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to fix/skip some tests failed on Windows. This PR takes over https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12696.
**Before**
- **SparkSubmitSuite**
```
[info] - launch simple application with spark-submit *** FAILED *** (202 milliseconds)
[info] java.io.IOException: Cannot run program "./bin/spark-submit" (in directory "C:\projects\spark"): CreateProcess error=2, The system cannot find the file specifie
[info] - includes jars passed in through --jars *** FAILED *** (1 second, 625 milliseconds)
[info] java.io.IOException: Cannot run program "./bin/spark-submit" (in directory "C:\projects\spark"): CreateProcess error=2, The system cannot find the file specified
```
- **DiskStoreSuite**
```
[info] - reads of memory-mapped and non memory-mapped files are equivalent *** FAILED *** (1 second, 78 milliseconds)
[info] diskStoreMapped.remove(blockId) was false (DiskStoreSuite.scala:41)
```
**After**
- **SparkSubmitSuite**
```
[info] - launch simple application with spark-submit (578 milliseconds)
[info] - includes jars passed in through --jars (1 second, 875 milliseconds)
```
- **DiskStoreSuite**
```
[info] DiskStoreSuite:
[info] - reads of memory-mapped and non memory-mapped files are equivalent !!! CANCELED !!! (766 milliseconds
```
For `CreateTableAsSelectSuite` and `FsHistoryProviderSuite`, I could not reproduce as the Java version seems higher than the one that has the bugs about `setReadable(..)` and `setWritable(...)` but as they are bugs reported clearly, it'd be sensible to skip those. We should revert the changes for both back as soon as we drop the support of Java 7.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually tested via AppVeyor.
Closes #12696
Author: Tao LI <tl@microsoft.com>
Author: U-FAREAST\tl <tl@microsoft.com>
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes #15320 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-14914.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR makes block replication strategies pluggable. It provides two trait that can be implemented, one that maps a host to its topology and is used in the master, and the second that helps prioritize a list of peers for block replication and would run in the executors.
This patch contains default implementations of these traits that make sure current Spark behavior is unchanged.
## How was this patch tested?
This patch should not change Spark behavior in any way, and was tested with unit tests for storage.
Author: Shubham Chopra <schopra31@bloomberg.net>
Closes #13152 from shubhamchopra/RackAwareBlockReplication.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
FsHistoryProvider was writing a hidden file (to check the fs's clock).
Even though it deleted the file immediately, sometimes another thread
would try to scan the files on the fs in-between, and then there would
be an error msg logged which was very misleading for the end-user.
(The logged error was harmless, though.)
## How was this patch tested?
I added one unit test, but to be clear, that test was passing before. The actual change in behavior in that test is just logging (after the change, there is no more logged error), which I just manually verified.
Author: Imran Rashid <irashid@cloudera.com>
Closes #15250 from squito/SPARK-17676.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Ramp down the task launch logs from INFO to DEBUG. Task launches can happen orders of magnitude more than executor registration so it makes the logs easier to handle if they are different log levels. For larger jobs, there can be 100,000s of task launches which makes the driver log huge.
## How was this patch tested?
No tests, as this is a trivial change.
Author: Brian Cho <bcho@fb.com>
Closes #15290 from dafrista/ramp-down-task-logging.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
application
Added a new API getApplicationInfo(appId: String) in class ApplicationHistoryProvider and class SparkUI to get app info. In this change, FsHistoryProvider can directly fetch one app info in O(1) time complexity compared to O(n) before the change which used an Iterator.find() interface.
Both ApplicationCache and OneApplicationResource classes adopt this new api.
manual tests
Author: Gang Wu <wgtmac@uber.com>
Closes #15247 from wgtmac/SPARK-17671.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The Seq[WorkerOffer] is accessed by index, so it really should be an
IndexedSeq, otherwise an O(n) operation becomes O(n^2). In practice
this hasn't been an issue b/c where these offers are generated, the call
to `.toSeq` just happens to create an IndexedSeq anyway.I got bitten by
this in performance tests I was doing, and its better for the types to be
more precise so eg. a change in Scala doesn't destroy performance.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests via jenkins.
Author: Imran Rashid <irashid@cloudera.com>
Closes #15221 from squito/SPARK-17648.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
build: use 'Class.forName' instead of 'Utils.classForName'
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix ClassCircularityError in ReplSuite tests when Spark is built by Maven build.
## How was this patch tested?
(1)
```
build/mvn -DskipTests -Phadoop-2.3 -Pyarn -Phive -Phive-thriftserver -Pkinesis-asl -Pmesos clean package
```
Then test:
```
build/mvn -Dtest=none -DwildcardSuites=org.apache.spark.repl.ReplSuite test
```
ReplSuite tests passed
(2)
Manual Tests against some Spark applications in Yarn client mode and Yarn cluster mode. Need to check if spark caller contexts are written into HDFS hdfs-audit.log and Yarn RM audit log successfully.
Author: Weiqing Yang <yangweiqing001@gmail.com>
Closes #15286 from Sherry302/SPARK-16757.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
| Time |Thread 1 , Job1 | Thread 2 , Job2 |
|:-------------:|:-------------:|:-----:|
| 1 | abort stage due to FetchFailed | |
| 2 | failedStages += failedStage | |
| 3 | | task failed due to FetchFailed |
| 4 | | can not post ResubmitFailedStages because failedStages is not empty |
Then job2 of thread2 never resubmit the failed stage and hang.
We should not add the failedStages when abortStage for fetch failure
## How was this patch tested?
added unit test
Author: w00228970 <wangfei1@huawei.com>
Author: wangfei <wangfei_hello@126.com>
Closes #15213 from scwf/dag-resubmit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
There is an assert in MemoryStore's putIteratorAsValues method which is used to check if unroll memory is not released too much. This assert looks wrong.
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins tests.
Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <simonh@tw.ibm.com>
Closes #14642 from viirya/fix-unroll-memory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1. Pass `jobId` to Task.
2. Invoke Hadoop APIs.
* A new function `setCallerContext` is added in `Utils`. `setCallerContext` function invokes APIs of `org.apache.hadoop.ipc.CallerContext` to set up spark caller contexts, which will be written into `hdfs-audit.log` and Yarn RM audit log.
* For HDFS: Spark sets up its caller context by invoking`org.apache.hadoop.ipc.CallerContext` in `Task` and Yarn `Client` and `ApplicationMaster`.
* For Yarn: Spark sets up its caller context by invoking `org.apache.hadoop.ipc.CallerContext` in Yarn `Client`.
## How was this patch tested?
Manual Tests against some Spark applications in Yarn client mode and Yarn cluster mode. Need to check if spark caller contexts are written into HDFS hdfs-audit.log and Yarn RM audit log successfully.
For example, run SparkKmeans in Yarn client mode:
```
./bin/spark-submit --verbose --executor-cores 3 --num-executors 1 --master yarn --deploy-mode client --class org.apache.spark.examples.SparkKMeans examples/target/original-spark-examples_2.11-2.1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar hdfs://localhost:9000/lr_big.txt 2 5
```
**Before**:
There will be no Spark caller context in records of `hdfs-audit.log` and Yarn RM audit log.
**After**:
Spark caller contexts will be written in records of `hdfs-audit.log` and Yarn RM audit log.
These are records in `hdfs-audit.log`:
```
2016-09-20 11:54:24,116 INFO FSNamesystem.audit: allowed=true ugi=wyang (auth:SIMPLE) ip=/127.0.0.1 cmd=open src=/lr_big.txt dst=null perm=null proto=rpc callerContext=SPARK_CLIENT_AppId_application_1474394339641_0005
2016-09-20 11:54:28,164 INFO FSNamesystem.audit: allowed=true ugi=wyang (auth:SIMPLE) ip=/127.0.0.1 cmd=open src=/lr_big.txt dst=null perm=null proto=rpc callerContext=SPARK_TASK_AppId_application_1474394339641_0005_JobId_0_StageId_0_AttemptId_0_TaskId_2_AttemptNum_0
2016-09-20 11:54:28,164 INFO FSNamesystem.audit: allowed=true ugi=wyang (auth:SIMPLE) ip=/127.0.0.1 cmd=open src=/lr_big.txt dst=null perm=null proto=rpc callerContext=SPARK_TASK_AppId_application_1474394339641_0005_JobId_0_StageId_0_AttemptId_0_TaskId_1_AttemptNum_0
2016-09-20 11:54:28,164 INFO FSNamesystem.audit: allowed=true ugi=wyang (auth:SIMPLE) ip=/127.0.0.1 cmd=open src=/lr_big.txt dst=null perm=null proto=rpc callerContext=SPARK_TASK_AppId_application_1474394339641_0005_JobId_0_StageId_0_AttemptId_0_TaskId_0_AttemptNum_0
```
```
2016-09-20 11:59:33,868 INFO FSNamesystem.audit: allowed=true ugi=wyang (auth:SIMPLE) ip=/127.0.0.1 cmd=mkdirs src=/private/tmp/hadoop-wyang/nm-local-dir/usercache/wyang/appcache/application_1474394339641_0006/container_1474394339641_0006_01_000001/spark-warehouse dst=null perm=wyang:supergroup:rwxr-xr-x proto=rpc callerContext=SPARK_APPLICATION_MASTER_AppId_application_1474394339641_0006_AttemptId_1
2016-09-20 11:59:37,214 INFO FSNamesystem.audit: allowed=true ugi=wyang (auth:SIMPLE) ip=/127.0.0.1 cmd=open src=/lr_big.txt dst=null perm=null proto=rpc callerContext=SPARK_TASK_AppId_application_1474394339641_0006_AttemptId_1_JobId_0_StageId_0_AttemptId_0_TaskId_1_AttemptNum_0
2016-09-20 11:59:37,215 INFO FSNamesystem.audit: allowed=true ugi=wyang (auth:SIMPLE) ip=/127.0.0.1 cmd=open src=/lr_big.txt dst=null perm=null proto=rpc callerContext=SPARK_TASK_AppId_application_1474394339641_0006_AttemptId_1_JobId_0_StageId_0_AttemptId_0_TaskId_2_AttemptNum_0
2016-09-20 11:59:37,215 INFO FSNamesystem.audit: allowed=true ugi=wyang (auth:SIMPLE) ip=/127.0.0.1 cmd=open src=/lr_big.txt dst=null perm=null proto=rpc callerContext=SPARK_TASK_AppId_application_1474394339641_0006_AttemptId_1_JobId_0_StageId_0_AttemptId_0_TaskId_0_AttemptNum_0
2016-09-20 11:59:42,391 INFO FSNamesystem.audit: allowed=true ugi=wyang (auth:SIMPLE) ip=/127.0.0.1 cmd=open src=/lr_big.txt dst=null perm=null proto=rpc callerContext=SPARK_TASK_AppId_application_1474394339641_0006_AttemptId_1_JobId_0_StageId_0_AttemptId_0_TaskId_3_AttemptNum_0
```
This is a record in Yarn RM log:
```
2016-09-20 11:59:24,050 INFO org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.RMAuditLogger: USER=wyang IP=127.0.0.1 OPERATION=Submit Application Request TARGET=ClientRMService RESULT=SUCCESS APPID=application_1474394339641_0006 CALLERCONTEXT=SPARK_CLIENT_AppId_application_1474394339641_0006
```
Author: Weiqing Yang <yangweiqing001@gmail.com>
Closes #14659 from Sherry302/callercontextSubmit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix two comments since Actor is not used anymore.
Author: Ding Fei <danis@danix>
Closes #15251 from danix800/comment-fixing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Log how many Spark events got dropped in LiveListenerBus so that the user can get insights on how to set a correct event queue size.
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes #15220 from zsxwing/SPARK-17649.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When a malformed URL was sent to Executors through `sc.addJar` and `sc.addFile`, the executors become unusable, because they constantly throw `MalformedURLException`s and can never acknowledge that the file or jar is just bad input.
This PR tries to fix that problem by making sure MalformedURLs can never be submitted through `sc.addJar` and `sc.addFile`. Another solution would be to blacklist bad files and jars on Executors. Maybe fail the first time, and then ignore the second time (but print a warning message).
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests in SparkContextSuite
Author: Burak Yavuz <brkyvz@gmail.com>
Closes #15224 from brkyvz/SPARK-17650.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently task metrics don't support executor CPU time, so there's no way to calculate how much CPU time a stage/task took from History Server metrics. This PR enables reporting CPU time.
Author: jisookim <jisookim0513@gmail.com>
Closes #10212 from jisookim0513/add-cpu-time-metric.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Accumulator V2
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Move the internals of the PySpark accumulator API from the old deprecated API on top of the new accumulator API.
## How was this patch tested?
The existing PySpark accumulator tests (both unit tests and doc tests at the start of accumulator.py).
Author: Holden Karau <holden@us.ibm.com>
Closes #14467 from holdenk/SPARK-16861-refactor-pyspark-accumulator-api.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
call time.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We are killing multiple executors together instead of iterating over expensive RPC calls to kill single executor.
## How was this patch tested?
Executed sample spark job to observe executors being killed/removed with dynamic allocation enabled.
Author: Dhruve Ashar <dashar@yahoo-inc.com>
Author: Dhruve Ashar <dhruveashar@gmail.com>
Closes #15152 from dhruve/impr/SPARK-17365.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
executors
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Scala/Python users can add files to Spark job by submit options ```--files``` or ```SparkContext.addFile()```. Meanwhile, users can get the added file by ```SparkFiles.get(filename)```.
We should also support this function for SparkR users, since they also have the requirements for some shared dependency files. For example, SparkR users can download third party R packages to driver firstly, add these files to the Spark job as dependency by this API and then each executor can install these packages by ```install.packages```.
## How was this patch tested?
Add unit test.
Author: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>
Closes #15131 from yanboliang/spark-17577.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
cluster mode
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Yarn and mesos cluster mode support remote python path (HDFS/S3 scheme) by their own mechanism, it is not necessary to check and format the python when running on these modes. This is a potential regression compared to 1.6, so here propose to fix it.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test to verify SparkSubmit arguments, also with local cluster verification. Because of lack of `MiniDFSCluster` support in Spark unit test, there's no integration test added.
Author: jerryshao <sshao@hortonworks.com>
Closes #15137 from jerryshao/SPARK-17512.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In TaskResultGetter, enqueueFailedTask currently deserializes the result
as a TaskEndReason. But the type is actually more specific, its a
TaskFailedReason. This just leads to more blind casting later on – it
would be more clear if the msg was cast to the right type immediately,
so method parameter types could be tightened.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests via jenkins. Note that the code was already performing a blind-cast to a TaskFailedReason before in any case, just in a different spot, so there shouldn't be any behavior change.
Author: Imran Rashid <irashid@cloudera.com>
Closes #15181 from squito/SPARK-17623.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The goal of this feature is to allow the Spark driver to run in an
isolated environment, such as a docker container, and be able to use
the host's port forwarding mechanism to be able to accept connections
from the outside world.
The change is restricted to the driver: there is no support for achieving
the same thing on executors (or the YARN AM for that matter). Those still
need full access to the outside world so that, for example, connections
can be made to an executor's block manager.
The core of the change is simple: add a new configuration that tells what's
the address the driver should bind to, which can be different than the address
it advertises to executors (spark.driver.host). Everything else is plumbing
the new configuration where it's needed.
To use the feature, the host starting the container needs to set up the
driver's port range to fall into a range that is being forwarded; this
required the block manager port to need a special configuration just for
the driver, which falls back to the existing spark.blockManager.port when
not set. This way, users can modify the driver settings without affecting
the executors; it would theoretically be nice to also have different
retry counts for driver and executors, but given that docker (at least)
allows forwarding port ranges, we can probably live without that for now.
Because of the nature of the feature it's kinda hard to add unit tests;
I just added a simple one to make sure the configuration works.
This was tested with a docker image running spark-shell with the following
command:
docker blah blah blah \
-p 38000-38100:38000-38100 \
[image] \
spark-shell \
--num-executors 3 \
--conf spark.shuffle.service.enabled=false \
--conf spark.dynamicAllocation.enabled=false \
--conf spark.driver.host=[host's address] \
--conf spark.driver.port=38000 \
--conf spark.driver.blockManager.port=38020 \
--conf spark.ui.port=38040
Running on YARN; verified the driver works, executors start up and listen
on ephemeral ports (instead of using the driver's config), and that caching
and shuffling (without the shuffle service) works. Clicked through the UI
to make sure all pages (including executor thread dumps) worked. Also tested
apps without docker, and ran unit tests.
Author: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
Closes #15120 from vanzin/SPARK-4563.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- TaskState and ExecutorState expose isFailed and isFinished functions. It can be useful to add test coverage for different states. Currently, Other enums do not expose any functions so this PR aims just these two enums.
- `private` access modifier is added for Finished Task States Set
- A minor doc change is added.
## How was this patch tested?
New Unit tests are added and run locally.
Author: erenavsarogullari <erenavsarogullari@gmail.com>
Closes #15143 from erenavsarogullari/SPARK-17584.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
files recursively
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Users would like to add a directory as dependency in some cases, they can use ```SparkContext.addFile``` with argument ```recursive=true``` to recursively add all files under the directory by using Scala. But Python users can only add file not directory, we should also make it supported.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test.
Author: Yanbo Liang <ybliang8@gmail.com>
Closes #15140 from yanboliang/spark-17585.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
While reading source code of CORE and SQL core, I found some minor errors in comments such as extra space, missing blank line and grammar error.
I fixed these minor errors and might find more during my source code study.
## How was this patch tested?
Manually build
Author: wm624@hotmail.com <wm624@hotmail.com>
Closes #15151 from wangmiao1981/mem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds `Application.executorLimit` to the applicatino page
## How was this patch tested?
Checked the UI manually.
Screenshots:
1. Dynamic allocation is disabled
<img width="484" alt="screen shot 2016-09-07 at 4 21 49 pm" src="https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/1000778/18332029/210056ea-7518-11e6-9f52-76d96046c1c0.png">
2. Dynamic allocation is enabled.
<img width="466" alt="screen shot 2016-09-07 at 4 25 30 pm" src="https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/1000778/18332034/2c07700a-7518-11e6-8fce-aebe25014902.png">
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes #15001 from zsxwing/fix-core-info.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
putIteratorAsBytes()
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`MemoryStore.putIteratorAsBytes()` may silently lose values when used with `KryoSerializer` because it does not properly close the serialization stream before attempting to deserialize the already-serialized values, which may cause values buffered in Kryo's internal buffers to not be read.
This is the root cause behind a user-reported "wrong answer" bug in PySpark caching reported by bennoleslie on the Spark user mailing list in a thread titled "pyspark persist MEMORY_ONLY vs MEMORY_AND_DISK". Due to Spark 2.0's automatic use of KryoSerializer for "safe" types (such as byte arrays, primitives, etc.) this misuse of serializers manifested itself as silent data corruption rather than a StreamCorrupted error (which you might get from JavaSerializer).
The minimal fix, implemented here, is to close the serialization stream before attempting to deserialize written values. In addition, this patch adds several additional assertions / precondition checks to prevent misuse of `PartiallySerializedBlock` and `ChunkedByteBufferOutputStream`.
## How was this patch tested?
The original bug was masked by an invalid assert in the memory store test cases: the old assert compared two results record-by-record with `zip` but didn't first check that the lengths of the two collections were equal, causing missing records to go unnoticed. The updated test case reproduced this bug.
In addition, I added a new `PartiallySerializedBlockSuite` to unit test that component.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes #15043 from JoshRosen/partially-serialized-block-values-iterator-bugfix.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add a clearUntil() method on BitSet (adapted from the pre-existing setUntil() method).
Use this method to clear the subset of the BitSet which needs to be used during merge joins.
## How was this patch tested?
dev/run-tests, as well as performance tests on skewed data as described in jira.
I expect there to be a small local performance hit using BitSet.clearUntil rather than BitSet.clear for normally shaped (unskewed) joins (additional read on the last long). This is expected to be de-minimis and was not specifically tested.
Author: David Navas <davidn@clearstorydata.com>
Closes #15084 from davidnavas/bitSet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17567
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Documentation (http://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/api/scala/#org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD) contains broken link to Spark paper (http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~matei/papers/2012/nsdi_spark.pdf).
I found it elsewhere (https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/nsdi12/nsdi12-final138.pdf) and I hope it is the same one. It should be uploaded to and linked from some Apache controlled storage, so it won't break again.
## How was this patch tested?
Tested manually on local laptop.
Author: Xin Ren <iamshrek@126.com>
Closes #15121 from keypointt/SPARK-17567.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
put() exceptions
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
If a BlockManager `put()` call failed after the BlockManagerMaster was notified of a block's availability then incomplete cleanup logic in a `finally` block would never send a second block status method to inform the master of the block's unavailability. This, in turn, leads to fetch failures and used to be capable of causing complete job failures before #15037 was fixed.
This patch addresses this issue via multiple small changes:
- The `finally` block now calls `removeBlockInternal` when cleaning up from a failed `put()`; in addition to removing the `BlockInfo` entry (which was _all_ that the old cleanup logic did), this code (redundantly) tries to remove the block from the memory and disk stores (as an added layer of defense against bugs lower down in the stack) and optionally notifies the master of block removal (which now happens during exception-triggered cleanup).
- When a BlockManager receives a request for a block that it does not have it will now notify the master to update its block locations. This ensures that bad metadata pointing to non-existent blocks will eventually be fixed. Note that I could have implemented this logic in the block manager client (rather than in the remote server), but that would introduce the problem of distinguishing between transient and permanent failures; on the server, however, we know definitively that the block isn't present.
- Catch `NonFatal` instead of `Exception` to avoid swallowing `InterruptedException`s thrown from synchronous block replication calls.
This patch depends upon the refactorings in #15036, so that other patch will also have to be backported when backporting this fix.
For more background on this issue, including example logs from a real production failure, see [SPARK-17484](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17484).
## How was this patch tested?
Two new regression tests in BlockManagerSuite.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes #15085 from JoshRosen/SPARK-17484.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
SPARK-8029 (#9610) modified shuffle writers to first stage their data to a temporary file in the same directory as the final destination file and then to atomically rename this temporary file at the end of the write job. However, this change introduced the potential for the temporary output file to be leaked if an exception occurs during the write because the shuffle writers' existing error cleanup code doesn't handle deletion of the temp file.
This patch avoids this potential cause of disk-space leaks by adding `finally` blocks to ensure that temp files are always deleted if they haven't been renamed.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes #15104 from JoshRosen/cleanup-tmp-data-file-in-shuffle-writer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
self-kill
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Jira : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17451
`CoarseGrainedExecutorBackend` in some failure cases exits the JVM. While this does not have any issue, from the driver UI there is no specific reason captured for this. In this PR, I am adding functionality to `exitExecutor` to notify driver that the executor is exiting.
## How was this patch tested?
Ran the change over a test env and took down shuffle service before the executor could register to it. In the driver logs, where the job failure reason is mentioned (ie. `Job aborted due to stage ...` it gives the correct reason:
Before:
`ExecutorLostFailure (executor ZZZZZZZZZ exited caused by one of the running tasks) Reason: Remote RPC client disassociated. Likely due to containers exceeding thresholds, or network issues. Check driver logs for WARN messages.`
After:
`ExecutorLostFailure (executor ZZZZZZZZZ exited caused by one of the running tasks) Reason: Unable to create executor due to java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Timeout waiting for task.`
Author: Tejas Patil <tejasp@fb.com>
Closes #15013 from tejasapatil/SPARK-17451_inform_driver.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The job page will be too slow to open when there are thousands of executor events(added or removed). I found that in ExecutorsTab file, executorIdToData will not remove elements, it will increase all the time.Before this pr, it looks like [timeline1.png](https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12827112/timeline1.png). After this pr, it looks like [timeline2.png](https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12827113/timeline2.png)(we can set how many executor events will be displayed)
Author: cenyuhai <cenyuhai@didichuxing.com>
Closes #14969 from cenyuhai/SPARK-17406.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
when i use sc.makeRDD below
```
val data3 = sc.makeRDD(Seq())
println(data3.partitions.length)
```
I got an error:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Positive number of slices required
We can fix this bug just modify the last line ,do a check of seq.size
```
def makeRDD[T: ClassTag](seq: Seq[(T, Seq[String])]): RDD[T] = withScope {
assertNotStopped()
val indexToPrefs = seq.zipWithIndex.map(t => (t._2, t._1._2)).toMap
new ParallelCollectionRDD[T](this, seq.map(_._1), math.max(seq.size, defaultParallelism), indexToPrefs)
}
```
## How was this patch tested?
manual tests
(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)
Author: codlife <1004910847@qq.com>
Author: codlife <wangjianfei15@otcaix.iscas.ac.cn>
Closes #15077 from codlife/master.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`org.apache.spark.storage.MemoryStore` may lead to memory leak
The expression like `if (memoryMap(taskAttemptId) == 0) memoryMap.remove(taskAttemptId)` in method `releaseUnrollMemoryForThisTask` and `releasePendingUnrollMemoryForThisTask` should be called after release memory operation, whatever `memoryToRelease` is > 0 or not.
If the memory of a task has been set to 0 when calling a `releaseUnrollMemoryForThisTask` or a `releasePendingUnrollMemoryForThisTask` method, the key in the memory map corresponding to that task will never be removed from the hash map.
See the details in [SPARK-17465](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17465).
Author: Xing SHI <shi-kou@indetail.co.jp>
Closes #15022 from saturday-shi/SPARK-17465.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
can be read thread-safely
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Make CollectionAccumulator and SetAccumulator's value can be read thread-safely to fix the ConcurrentModificationException reported in [JIRA](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17463).
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes #15063 from zsxwing/SPARK-17463.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In the comment, there is redundant `the estimated`.
This PR simply remove the redundant comment and adjusts format.
Author: wm624@hotmail.com <wm624@hotmail.com>
Closes #15091 from wangmiao1981/comment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The relation between spark.network.timeout and spark.executor.heartbeatInterval should be mentioned in the document.
… network timeout]
Author: Jagadeesan <as2@us.ibm.com>
Closes #15042 from jagadeesanas2/SPARK-17449.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
entire job
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In Spark's `RDD.getOrCompute` we first try to read a local copy of a cached RDD block, then a remote copy, and only fall back to recomputing the block if no cached copy (local or remote) can be read. This logic works correctly in the case where no remote copies of the block exist, but if there _are_ remote copies and reads of those copies fail (due to network issues or internal Spark bugs) then the BlockManager will throw a `BlockFetchException` that will fail the task (and which could possibly fail the whole job if the read failures keep occurring).
In the cases of TorrentBroadcast and task result fetching we really do want to fail the entire job in case no remote blocks can be fetched, but this logic is inappropriate for reads of cached RDD blocks because those can/should be recomputed in case cached blocks are unavailable.
Therefore, I think that the `BlockManager.getRemoteBytes()` method should never throw on remote fetch errors and, instead, should handle failures by returning `None`.
## How was this patch tested?
Block manager changes should be covered by modified tests in `BlockManagerSuite`: the old tests expected exceptions to be thrown on failed remote reads, while the modified tests now expect `None` to be returned from the `getRemote*` method.
I also manually inspected all usages of `BlockManager.getRemoteValues()`, `getRemoteBytes()`, and `get()` to verify that they correctly pattern-match on the result and handle `None`. Note that these `None` branches are already exercised because the old `getRemoteBytes` returned `None` when no remote locations for the block could be found (which could occur if an executor died and its block manager de-registered with the master).
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes #15037 from JoshRosen/SPARK-17485.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch makes three minor refactorings to the BlockManager:
- Move the `if (info.tellMaster)` check out of `reportBlockStatus`; this fixes an issue where a debug logging message would incorrectly claim to have reported a block status to the master even though no message had been sent (in case `info.tellMaster == false`). This also makes it easier to write code which unconditionally sends block statuses to the master (which is necessary in another patch of mine).
- Split `removeBlock()` into two methods, the existing method and an internal `removeBlockInternal()` method which is designed to be called by internal code that already holds a write lock on the block. This is also needed by a followup patch.
- Instead of calling `getCurrentBlockStatus()` in `removeBlock()`, just pass `BlockStatus.empty`; the block status should always be empty following complete removal of a block.
These changes were originally authored as part of a bug fix patch which is targeted at branch-2.0 and master; I've split them out here into their own separate PR in order to make them easier to review and so that the behavior-changing parts of my other patch can be isolated to their own PR.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes #15036 from JoshRosen/cache-failure-race-conditions-refactorings-only.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
whole RDD in memory
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
MemoryStore may throw OutOfMemoryError when trying to cache a super big RDD that cannot fit in memory.
```
scala> sc.parallelize(1 to 1000000000, 100).map(x => new Array[Long](1000)).cache().count()
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
at $line14.$read$$iw$$iw$$iw$$iw$$iw$$iw$$iw$$iw$$anonfun$1.apply(<console>:24)
at $line14.$read$$iw$$iw$$iw$$iw$$iw$$iw$$iw$$iw$$anonfun$1.apply(<console>:23)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.next(Iterator.scala:409)
at scala.collection.Iterator$JoinIterator.next(Iterator.scala:232)
at org.apache.spark.storage.memory.PartiallyUnrolledIterator.next(MemoryStore.scala:683)
at org.apache.spark.InterruptibleIterator.next(InterruptibleIterator.scala:43)
at org.apache.spark.util.Utils$.getIteratorSize(Utils.scala:1684)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD$$anonfun$count$1.apply(RDD.scala:1134)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD$$anonfun$count$1.apply(RDD.scala:1134)
at org.apache.spark.SparkContext$$anonfun$runJob$5.apply(SparkContext.scala:1915)
at org.apache.spark.SparkContext$$anonfun$runJob$5.apply(SparkContext.scala:1915)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.ResultTask.runTask(ResultTask.scala:70)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:86)
at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:274)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
```
Spark MemoryStore uses SizeTrackingVector as a temporary unrolling buffer to store all input values that it has read so far before transferring the values to storage memory cache. The problem is that when the input RDD is too big for caching in memory, the temporary unrolling memory SizeTrackingVector is not garbage collected in time. As SizeTrackingVector can occupy all available storage memory, it may cause the executor JVM to run out of memory quickly.
More info can be found at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17503
## How was this patch tested?
Unit test and manual test.
### Before change
Heap memory consumption
<img width="702" alt="screen shot 2016-09-12 at 4 16 15 pm" src="https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/2595532/18429524/60d73a26-7906-11e6-9768-6f286f5c58c8.png">
Heap dump
<img width="1402" alt="screen shot 2016-09-12 at 4 34 19 pm" src="https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/2595532/18429577/cbc1ef20-7906-11e6-847b-b5903f450b3b.png">
### After change
Heap memory consumption
<img width="706" alt="screen shot 2016-09-12 at 4 29 10 pm" src="https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/2595532/18429503/4abe9342-7906-11e6-844a-b2f815072624.png">
Author: Sean Zhong <seanzhong@databricks.com>
Closes #15056 from clockfly/memory_store_leak.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
error message in PairRDDfunctions
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In order to avoid confusing user,
error message in `PairRDDfunctions`
`Default partitioner cannot partition array keys.`
is updated,
the one in `partitionBy` is replaced with
`Specified partitioner cannot partition array keys.`
other is replaced with
`Specified or default partitioner cannot partition array keys.`
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: WeichenXu <WeichenXu123@outlook.com>
Closes #15045 from WeichenXu123/fix_partitionBy_error_message.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
without sortBy
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
if there are many rdds in some situations,the sort will loss he performance servely,actually we needn't sort the rdds , we can just scan the rdds one time to gain the same goal.
## How was this patch tested?
manual tests
Author: codlife <1004910847@qq.com>
Closes #15039 from codlife/master.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
DAG will list all partitions in the graph, it is too slow and hard to see all graph.
Always we don't want to see all partitions,we just want to see the relations of DAG graph.
So I just show 2 root nodes for Rdds.
Before this PR, the DAG graph looks like [dag1.png](https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12824702/dag1.png), [dag3.png](https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12825456/dag3.png), after this PR, the DAG graph looks like [dag2.png](https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12824703/dag2.png),[dag4.png](https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12825457/dag4.png)
Author: cenyuhai <cenyuhai@didichuxing.com>
Author: 岑玉海 <261810726@qq.com>
Closes #14737 from cenyuhai/SPARK-17171.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The `TaskMetricsUIData.updatedBlockStatuses` field is assigned to but never read, increasing the memory consumption of the web UI. We should remove this field.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes #15038 from JoshRosen/remove-updated-block-statuses-from-TaskMetricsUIData.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Share the ForkJoinTaskSupport between UnionRDD instances to avoid creating a huge number of threads if lots of RDDs are created at the same time.
## How was this patch tested?
This uses existing UnionRDD tests.
Author: Ryan Blue <blue@apache.org>
Closes #14985 from rdblue/SPARK-17396-use-shared-pool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch adds methods for extracting major and minor versions as Int types in Scala from a Spark version string.
Motivation: There are many hacks within Spark's codebase to identify and compare Spark versions. We should add a simple utility to standardize these code paths, especially since there have been mistakes made in the past. This will let us add unit tests as well. Currently, I want this functionality to check Spark versions to provide backwards compatibility for ML model persistence.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests
Author: Joseph K. Bradley <joseph@databricks.com>
Closes #15017 from jkbradley/version-parsing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Workers UI
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pull request adds the functionality to enable accessing worker and application UI through master UI itself. Thus helps in accessing SparkUI when running spark cluster in closed networks e.g. Kubernetes. Cluster admin needs to expose only spark master UI and rest of the UIs can be in the private network, master UI will reverse proxy the connection request to corresponding resource. It adds the path for workers/application UIs as
WorkerUI: <http/https>://master-publicIP:<port>/target/workerID/
ApplicationUI: <http/https>://master-publicIP:<port>/target/appID/
This makes it easy for users to easily protect the Spark master cluster access by putting some reverse proxy e.g. https://github.com/bitly/oauth2_proxy
## How was this patch tested?
The functionality has been tested manually and there is a unit test too for testing access to worker UI with reverse proxy address.
pwendell bomeng BryanCutler can you please review it, thanks.
Author: Gurvinder Singh <gurvinder.singh@uninett.no>
Closes #13950 from gurvindersingh/rproxy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
DAGScheduler invalidates shuffle files when an executor loss event occurs, but not when the external shuffle service is enabled. This is because when shuffle service is on, the shuffle file lifetime can exceed the executor lifetime.
However, it also doesn't invalidate shuffle files when the shuffle service itself is lost (due to whole slave loss). This can cause long hangs when slaves are lost since the file loss is not detected until a subsequent stage attempts to read the shuffle files.
The proposed fix is to also invalidate shuffle files when an executor is lost due to a `SlaveLost` event.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit tests, also verified on an actual cluster that slave loss invalidates shuffle files immediately as expected.
cc mateiz
Author: Eric Liang <ekl@databricks.com>
Closes #14931 from ericl/sc-4439.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
SparkContext for Windows paths in SparkR
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes the Windows path issues in several APIs. Please refer https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17339 for more details.
## How was this patch tested?
Tests via AppVeyor CI - https://ci.appveyor.com/project/HyukjinKwon/spark/build/82-SPARK-17339-fix-r
Also, manually,
![2016-09-06 3 14 38](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/6477701/18263406/b93a98be-7444-11e6-9521-b28ee65a4771.png)
Author: hyukjinkwon <gurwls223@gmail.com>
Closes #14960 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-17339.
|