| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
and reflection that supported 1.x
Remove use of deprecated Hadoop APIs now that 2.2+ is required
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes #10446 from srowen/SPARK-12481.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
setupEndpointRef
### Remove AkkaRpcEnv
Keep `SparkEnv.actorSystem` because Streaming still uses it. Will remove it and AkkaUtils after refactoring Streaming actorStream API.
### Remove systemName
There are 2 places using `systemName`:
* `RpcEnvConfig.name`. Actually, although it's used as `systemName` in `AkkaRpcEnv`, `NettyRpcEnv` uses it as the service name to output the log `Successfully started service *** on port ***`. Since the service name in log is useful, I keep `RpcEnvConfig.name`.
* `def setupEndpointRef(systemName: String, address: RpcAddress, endpointName: String)`. Each `ActorSystem` has a `systemName`. Akka requires `systemName` in its URI and will refuse a connection if `systemName` is not matched. However, `NettyRpcEnv` doesn't use it. So we can remove `systemName` from `setupEndpointRef` since we are removing `AkkaRpcEnv`.
### Remove RpcEnv.uriOf
`uriOf` exists because Akka uses different URI formats for with and without authentication, e.g., `akka.ssl.tcp...` and `akka.tcp://...`. But `NettyRpcEnv` uses the same format. So it's not necessary after removing `AkkaRpcEnv`.
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes #10459 from zsxwing/remove-akka-rpc-env.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We switched to TorrentBroadcast in Spark 1.1, and HttpBroadcast has been undocumented since then. It's time to remove it in Spark 2.0.
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes #10531 from rxin/SPARK-12588.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The web UI's paginated table uses Javascript to implement certain navigation controls, such as table sorting and the "go to page" form. This is unnecessary and should be simplified to use plain HTML form controls and links.
/cc zsxwing, who wrote this original code, and yhuai.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes #10441 from JoshRosen/simplify-paginated-table-sorting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The feature was first added at commit: 7b877b27053bfb7092e250e01a3b887e1b50a109 but was later removed (probably by mistake) at commit: fc8b58195afa67fbb75b4c8303e022f703cbf007.
This change sets the default path of RDDs created via sc.textFile(...) to the path argument.
Here is the symptom:
* Using spark-1.5.2-bin-hadoop2.6:
scala> sc.textFile("/home/root/.bashrc").name
res5: String = null
scala> sc.binaryFiles("/home/root/.bashrc").name
res6: String = /home/root/.bashrc
* while using Spark 1.3.1:
scala> sc.textFile("/home/root/.bashrc").name
res0: String = /home/root/.bashrc
scala> sc.binaryFiles("/home/root/.bashrc").name
res1: String = /home/root/.bashrc
Author: Yaron Weinsberg <wyaron@gmail.com>
Author: yaron <yaron@il.ibm.com>
Closes #10456 from wyaron/master.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
suites after forcing to set specific value to "os.arch" property
Restore the original value of os.arch property after each test
Since some of tests forced to set the specific value to os.arch property, we need to set the original value.
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes #10289 from kiszk/SPARK-12311.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
According the benchmark [1], LZ4-java could be 80% (or 30%) faster than Snappy.
After changing the compressor to LZ4, I saw 20% improvement on end-to-end time for a TPCDS query (Q4).
[1] https://github.com/ning/jvm-compressor-benchmark/wiki
cc rxin
Author: Davies Liu <davies@databricks.com>
Closes #10342 from davies/lz4.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
considering preferred local hosts
When multiple workers exist in a host, we can bypass unnecessary remote access for broadcasts; block managers fetch broadcast blocks from the same host instead of remote hosts.
Author: Takeshi YAMAMURO <linguin.m.s@gmail.com>
Closes #10346 from maropu/OptimizeBlockLocationOrder.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes #10395 from rxin/SPARK-11808.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
new connections
Added `channelActive` to `RpcHandler` so that `NettyRpcHandler` doesn't need `clients` any more.
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes #10301 from zsxwing/network-events.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In discussion (SPARK-9552), we proposed a force kill in `killExecutors`. But if there is nothing to kill, it will return back with true (acknowledgement). And then, it causes the certain executor(s) (which is not eligible to kill) adding to pendingToRemove list for further actions.
In this patch, we'd like to change the return semantics. If there is nothing to kill, we will return "false". and therefore all those non-eligible executors won't be added to the pendingToRemove list.
vanzin andrewor14 As the follow up of PR#7888, please let me know your comments.
Author: Grace <jie.huang@intel.com>
Author: Jie Huang <hjie@fosun.com>
Author: Andrew Or <andrew@databricks.com>
Closes #9796 from GraceH/emptyPendingToRemove.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Not jira is created.
The original test is passed because the class cast is lazy (only when the object's method is invoked).
Author: Jeff Zhang <zjffdu@apache.org>
Closes #10371 from zjffdu/minor_fix.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
characters
This PR encodes and decodes the file name to fix the issue.
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes #10208 from zsxwing/uri.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`DAGSchedulerEventLoop` normally only logs errors (so it can continue to process more events, from other jobs). However, this is not desirable in the tests -- the tests should be able to easily detect any exception, and also shouldn't silently succeed if there is an exception.
This was suggested by mateiz on https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7699. It may have already turned up an issue in "zero split job".
Author: Imran Rashid <irashid@cloudera.com>
Closes #8466 from squito/SPARK-10248.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Please help to review, thanks a lot.
Author: jerryshao <sshao@hortonworks.com>
Closes #10195 from jerryshao/SPARK-10123.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
AsyncRDDActions to support non-blocking operation
These changes rework the implementations of `SimpleFutureAction`, `ComplexFutureAction`, `JobWaiter`, and `AsyncRDDActions` such that asynchronous callbacks on the generated `Futures` NEVER block waiting for a job to complete. A small amount of mutex synchronization is necessary to protect the internal fields that manage cancellation, but these locks are only held very briefly and in practice should almost never cause any blocking to occur. The existing blocking APIs of these classes are retained, but they simply delegate to the underlying non-blocking API and `Await` the results with indefinite timeouts.
Associated JIRA ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9026
Also fixes: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-4514
This pull request contains all my own original work, which I release to the Spark project under its open source license.
Author: Richard W. Eggert II <richard.eggert@gmail.com>
Closes #9264 from reggert/fix-futureaction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix a minor typo (unbalanced bracket) in ResetSystemProperties.
Author: Holden Karau <holden@us.ibm.com>
Closes #10303 from holdenk/SPARK-12332-trivial-typo-in-ResetSystemProperties-comment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
disconnetion message
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes #10261 from zsxwing/SPARK-12267.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
**Problem.** In unified memory management, acquiring execution memory may lead to eviction of storage memory. However, the space freed from evicting cached blocks is distributed among all active tasks. Thus, an incorrect upper bound on the execution memory per task can cause the acquisition to fail, leading to OOM's and premature spills.
**Example.** Suppose total memory is 1000B, cached blocks occupy 900B, `spark.memory.storageFraction` is 0.4, and there are two active tasks. In this case, the cap on task execution memory is 100B / 2 = 50B. If task A tries to acquire 200B, it will evict 100B of storage but can only acquire 50B because of the incorrect cap. For another example, see this [regression test](https://github.com/andrewor14/spark/blob/fix-oom/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/memory/UnifiedMemoryManagerSuite.scala#L233) that I stole from JoshRosen.
**Solution.** Fix the cap on task execution memory. It should take into account the space that could have been freed by storage in addition to the current amount of memory available to execution. In the example above, the correct cap should have been 600B / 2 = 300B.
This patch also guards against the race condition (SPARK-12253):
(1) Existing tasks collectively occupy all execution memory
(2) New task comes in and blocks while existing tasks spill
(3) After tasks finish spilling, another task jumps in and puts in a large block, stealing the freed memory
(4) New task still cannot acquire memory and goes back to sleep
Author: Andrew Or <andrew@databricks.com>
Closes #10240 from andrewor14/fix-oom.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds documentation for Spark configurations that affect off-heap memory and makes some naming and validation improvements for those configs.
- Change `spark.memory.offHeapSize` to `spark.memory.offHeap.size`. This is fine because this configuration has not shipped in any Spark release yet (it's new in Spark 1.6).
- Deprecated `spark.unsafe.offHeap` in favor of a new `spark.memory.offHeap.enabled` configuration. The motivation behind this change is to gather all memory-related configurations under the same prefix.
- Add a check which prevents users from setting `spark.memory.offHeap.enabled=true` when `spark.memory.offHeap.size == 0`. After SPARK-11389 (#9344), which was committed in Spark 1.6, Spark enforces a hard limit on the amount of off-heap memory that it will allocate to tasks. As a result, enabling off-heap execution memory without setting `spark.memory.offHeap.size` will lead to immediate OOMs. The new configuration validation makes this scenario easier to diagnose, helping to avoid user confusion.
- Document these configurations on the configuration page.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes #10237 from JoshRosen/SPARK-12251.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This avoids bringing up yet another HTTP server on the driver, and
instead reuses the file server already managed by the driver's
RpcEnv. As a bonus, the repl now inherits the security features of
the network library.
There's also a small change to create the directory for storing classes
under the root temp dir for the application (instead of directly
under java.io.tmpdir).
Author: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
Closes #9923 from vanzin/SPARK-11563.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
JoshRosen
Author: Andrew Or <andrew@databricks.com>
Closes #10229 from andrewor14/unroll-test-comments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch fixes a bug in the eviction of storage memory by execution.
## The bug:
In general, execution should be able to evict storage memory when the total storage memory usage is greater than `maxMemory * spark.memory.storageFraction`. Due to a bug, however, Spark might wind up evicting no storage memory in certain cases where the storage memory usage was between `maxMemory * spark.memory.storageFraction` and `maxMemory`. For example, here is a regression test which illustrates the bug:
```scala
val maxMemory = 1000L
val taskAttemptId = 0L
val (mm, ms) = makeThings(maxMemory)
// Since we used the default storage fraction (0.5), we should be able to allocate 500 bytes
// of storage memory which are immune to eviction by execution memory pressure.
// Acquire enough storage memory to exceed the storage region size
assert(mm.acquireStorageMemory(dummyBlock, 750L, evictedBlocks))
assertEvictBlocksToFreeSpaceNotCalled(ms)
assert(mm.executionMemoryUsed === 0L)
assert(mm.storageMemoryUsed === 750L)
// At this point, storage is using 250 more bytes of memory than it is guaranteed, so execution
// should be able to reclaim up to 250 bytes of storage memory.
// Therefore, execution should now be able to require up to 500 bytes of memory:
assert(mm.acquireExecutionMemory(500L, taskAttemptId, MemoryMode.ON_HEAP) === 500L) // <--- fails by only returning 250L
assert(mm.storageMemoryUsed === 500L)
assert(mm.executionMemoryUsed === 500L)
assertEvictBlocksToFreeSpaceCalled(ms, 250L)
```
The problem relates to the control flow / interaction between `StorageMemoryPool.shrinkPoolToReclaimSpace()` and `MemoryStore.ensureFreeSpace()`. While trying to allocate the 500 bytes of execution memory, the `UnifiedMemoryManager` discovers that it will need to reclaim 250 bytes of memory from storage, so it calls `StorageMemoryPool.shrinkPoolToReclaimSpace(250L)`. This method, in turn, calls `MemoryStore.ensureFreeSpace(250L)`. However, `ensureFreeSpace()` first checks whether the requested space is less than `maxStorageMemory - storageMemoryUsed`, which will be true if there is any free execution memory because it turns out that `MemoryStore.maxStorageMemory = (maxMemory - onHeapExecutionMemoryPool.memoryUsed)` when the `UnifiedMemoryManager` is used.
The control flow here is somewhat confusing (it grew to be messy / confusing over time / as a result of the merging / refactoring of several components). In the pre-Spark 1.6 code, `ensureFreeSpace` was called directly by the `MemoryStore` itself, whereas in 1.6 it's involved in a confusing control flow where `MemoryStore` calls `MemoryManager.acquireStorageMemory`, which then calls back into `MemoryStore.ensureFreeSpace`, which, in turn, calls `MemoryManager.freeStorageMemory`.
## The solution:
The solution implemented in this patch is to remove the confusing circular control flow between `MemoryManager` and `MemoryStore`, making the storage memory acquisition process much more linear / straightforward. The key changes:
- Remove a layer of inheritance which made the memory manager code harder to understand (53841174760a24a0df3eb1562af1f33dbe340eb9).
- Move some bounds checks earlier in the call chain (13ba7ada77f87ef1ec362aec35c89a924e6987cb).
- Refactor `ensureFreeSpace()` so that the part which evicts blocks can be called independently from the part which checks whether there is enough free space to avoid eviction (7c68ca09cb1b12f157400866983f753ac863380e).
- Realize that this lets us remove a layer of overloads from `ensureFreeSpace` (eec4f6c87423d5e482b710e098486b3bbc4daf06).
- Realize that `ensureFreeSpace()` can simply be replaced with an `evictBlocksToFreeSpace()` method which is called [after we've already figured out](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/2dc842aea82c8895125d46a00aa43dfb0d121de9/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/memory/StorageMemoryPool.scala#L88) how much memory needs to be reclaimed via eviction; (2dc842aea82c8895125d46a00aa43dfb0d121de9).
Along the way, I fixed some problems with the mocks in `MemoryManagerSuite`: the old mocks would [unconditionally](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/80a824d36eec9d9a9f092ee1741453851218ec73/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/memory/MemoryManagerSuite.scala#L84) report that a block had been evicted even if there was enough space in the storage pool such that eviction would be avoided.
I also fixed a problem where `StorageMemoryPool._memoryUsed` might become negative due to freed memory being double-counted when excution evicts storage. The problem was that `StorageMemoryPoolshrinkPoolToFreeSpace` would [decrement `_memoryUsed`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7c68ca09cb1b12f157400866983f753ac863380e#diff-935c68a9803be144ed7bafdd2f756a0fL133) even though `StorageMemoryPool.freeMemory` had already decremented it as each evicted block was freed. See SPARK-12189 for details.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Author: Andrew Or <andrew@databricks.com>
Closes #10170 from JoshRosen/SPARK-12165.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Because of AM failure, the target executor number between driver and AM will be different, which will lead to unexpected behavior in dynamic allocation. So when AM is re-registered with driver, state in `ExecutorAllocationManager` and `CoarseGrainedSchedulerBacked` should be reset.
This issue is originally addressed in #8737 , here re-opened again. Thanks a lot KaiXinXiaoLei for finding this issue.
andrewor14 and vanzin would you please help to review this, thanks a lot.
Author: jerryshao <sshao@hortonworks.com>
Closes #9963 from jerryshao/SPARK-10582.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Buffer underflow exception
Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12222
Deserialize RoaringBitmap using Kryo serializer throw Buffer underflow exception:
```
com.esotericsoftware.kryo.KryoException: Buffer underflow.
at com.esotericsoftware.kryo.io.Input.require(Input.java:156)
at com.esotericsoftware.kryo.io.Input.skip(Input.java:131)
at com.esotericsoftware.kryo.io.Input.skip(Input.java:264)
```
This is caused by a bug of kryo's `Input.skip(long count)`(https://github.com/EsotericSoftware/kryo/issues/119) and we call this method in `KryoInputDataInputBridge`.
Instead of upgrade kryo's version, this pr bypass the kryo's `Input.skip(long count)` by directly call another `skip` method in kryo's Input.java(https://github.com/EsotericSoftware/kryo/blob/kryo-2.21/src/com/esotericsoftware/kryo/io/Input.java#L124), i.e. write the bug-fixed version of `Input.skip(long count)` in KryoInputDataInputBridge's `skipBytes` method.
more detail link to https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9748#issuecomment-162860246
Author: Fei Wang <wangfei1@huawei.com>
Closes #10213 from scwf/patch-1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The json endpoint for stages doesn't include information on the stage duration that is present in the UI. This looks like a simple oversight, they should be included. eg., the metrics should be included at api/v1/applications/<appId>/stages.
Metrics I've added are: submissionTime, firstTaskLaunchedTime and completionTime
Author: Xin Ren <iamshrek@126.com>
Closes #10107 from keypointt/SPARK-11155.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`ByteBuffer` doesn't guarantee all contents in `ByteBuffer.array` are valid. E.g, a ByteBuffer returned by `ByteBuffer.slice`. We should not use the whole content of `ByteBuffer` unless we know that's correct.
This patch fixed all places that use `ByteBuffer.array` incorrectly.
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes #10083 from zsxwing/bytebuffer-array.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We should upgrade to SBT 0.13.9, since this is a requirement in order to use SBT's new Maven-style resolution features (which will be done in a separate patch, because it's blocked by some binary compatibility issues in the POM reader plugin).
I also upgraded Scalastyle to version 0.8.0, which was necessary in order to fix a Scala 2.10.5 compatibility issue (see https://github.com/scalastyle/scalastyle/issues/156). The newer Scalastyle is slightly stricter about whitespace surrounding tokens, so I fixed the new style violations.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes #10112 from JoshRosen/upgrade-to-sbt-0.13.9.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
**Problem.** Event logs in 1.6 were much bigger than 1.5. I ran page rank and the event log size in 1.6 was almost 5x that in 1.5. I did a bisect to find that the RDD callsite added in #9398 is largely responsible for this.
**Solution.** This patch removes the long form of the callsite (which is not used!) from the event log. This reduces the size of the event log significantly.
*Note on compatibility*: if this patch is to be merged into 1.6.0, then it won't break any compatibility. Otherwise, if it is merged into 1.6.1, then we might need to add more backward compatibility handling logic (currently does not exist yet).
Author: Andrew Or <andrew@databricks.com>
Closes #10115 from andrewor14/smaller-event-logs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We should try increasing a timeout in NettyBlockTransferSecuritySuite in order to reduce that suite's flakiness in Jenkins.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes #10113 from JoshRosen/SPARK-12082.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Across Different Languages
I have tried to address all the comments in pull request https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2447.
Note that the second commit (using the new method in all internal code of all components) is quite intrusive and could be omitted.
Author: Jeroen Schot <jeroen.schot@surfsara.nl>
Closes #9767 from schot/master.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The existing `spark.memory.fraction` (default 0.75) gives the system 25% of the space to work with. For small heaps, this is not enough: e.g. default 1GB leaves only 250MB system memory. This is especially a problem in local mode, where the driver and executor are crammed in the same JVM. Members of the community have reported driver OOM's in such cases.
**New proposal.** We now reserve 300MB before taking the 75%. For 1GB JVMs, this leaves `(1024 - 300) * 0.75 = 543MB` for execution and storage. This is proposal (1) listed in the [JIRA](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12081).
Author: Andrew Or <andrew@databricks.com>
Closes #10081 from andrewor14/unified-memory-small-heaps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The solution is the save the RDD partitioner in a separate file in the RDD checkpoint directory. That is, `<checkpoint dir>/_partitioner`. In most cases, whether the RDD partitioner was recovered or not, does not affect the correctness, only reduces performance. So this solution makes a best-effort attempt to save and recover the partitioner. If either fails, the checkpointing is not affected. This makes this patch safe and backward compatible.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes #9983 from tdas/SPARK-12004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This change seems large, but most of it is just replacing `byte[]`
with `ByteBuffer` and `new byte[]` with `ByteBuffer.allocate()`,
since it changes the network library's API.
The following are parts of the code that actually have meaningful
changes:
- The Message implementations were changed to inherit from a new
AbstractMessage that can optionally hold a reference to a body
(in the form of a ManagedBuffer); this is similar to how
ResponseWithBody worked before, except now it's not restricted
to just responses.
- The TransportFrameDecoder was pretty much rewritten to avoid
copies as much as possible; it doesn't rely on CompositeByteBuf
to accumulate incoming data anymore, since CompositeByteBuf
has issues when slices are retained. The code now is able to
create frames without having to resort to copying bytes except
for a few bytes (containing the frame length) in very rare cases.
- Some minor changes in the SASL layer to convert things back to
`byte[]` since the JDK SASL API operates on those.
Author: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
Closes #9987 from vanzin/SPARK-12007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
zk://host:port for a multi-master Mesos cluster using ZooKeeper
* According to below doc and validation logic in [SparkSubmit.scala](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala#L231), master URL for a mesos cluster should always start with `mesos://`
http://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/running-on-mesos.html
`The Master URLs for Mesos are in the form mesos://host:5050 for a single-master Mesos cluster, or mesos://zk://host:2181 for a multi-master Mesos cluster using ZooKeeper.`
* However, [SparkContext.scala](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala#L2749) fails the validation and can receive master URL in the form `zk://host:port`
* For the master URLs in the form `zk:host:port`, the valid form should be `mesos://zk://host:port`
* This PR restrict the validation in `SparkContext.scala`, and now only mesos master URLs prefixed with `mesos://` can be accepted.
* This PR also updated corresponding unit test.
Author: toddwan <tawan0109@outlook.com>
Closes #9886 from toddwan/S11859.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
doesn't cache any task
In the previous codes, `newDaemonCachedThreadPool` uses `SynchronousQueue`, which is wrong. `SynchronousQueue` is an empty queue that cannot cache any task. This patch uses `LinkedBlockingQueue` to fix it along with other fixes to make sure `newDaemonCachedThreadPool` can use at most `maxThreadNumber` threads, and after that, cache tasks to `LinkedBlockingQueue`.
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes #9978 from zsxwing/cached-threadpool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This change does a couple of different things to make sure that the RpcEnv-level
code and the network library agree about the status of outstanding RPCs.
For RPCs that do not expect a reply ("RpcEnv.send"), support for one way
messages (hello CORBA!) was added to the network layer. This is a
"fire and forget" message that does not require any state to be kept
by the TransportClient; as a result, the RpcEnv 'Ack' message is not needed
anymore.
For RPCs that do expect a reply ("RpcEnv.ask"), the network library now
returns the internal RPC id; if the RpcEnv layer decides to time out the
RPC before the network layer does, it now asks the TransportClient to
forget about the RPC, so that if the network-level timeout occurs, the
client is not killed.
As part of implementing the above, I cleaned up some of the code in the
netty rpc backend, removing types that were not necessary and factoring
out some common code. Of interest is a slight change in the exceptions
when posting messages to a stopped RpcEnv; that's mostly to avoid nasty
error messages from the local-cluster backend when shutting down, which
pollutes the terminal output.
Author: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
Closes #9917 from vanzin/SPARK-11866.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- NettyRpcEnv::openStream() now correctly propagates errors to
the read side of the pipe.
- NettyStreamManager now throws if the file being transferred does
not exist.
- The network library now correctly handles zero-sized streams.
Author: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
Closes #9941 from vanzin/SPARK-11956.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
with a Stage
This issue was addressed in https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5494, but the fix in that PR, while safe in the sense that it will prevent the SparkContext from shutting down, misses the actual bug. The intent of `submitMissingTasks` should be understood as "submit the Tasks that are missing for the Stage, and run them as part of the ActiveJob identified by jobId". Because of a long-standing bug, the `jobId` parameter was never being used. Instead, we were trying to use the jobId with which the Stage was created -- which may no longer exist as an ActiveJob, hence the crash reported in SPARK-6880.
The correct fix is to use the ActiveJob specified by the supplied jobId parameter, which is guaranteed to exist at the call sites of submitMissingTasks.
This fix should be applied to all maintenance branches, since it has existed since 1.0.
kayousterhout pankajarora12
Author: Mark Hamstra <markhamstra@gmail.com>
Author: Imran Rashid <irashid@cloudera.com>
Closes #6291 from markhamstra/SPARK-6880.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
thread
This is continuation of SPARK-11761
Andrew suggested adding this protection. See tail of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9741
Author: tedyu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
Closes #9852 from tedyu/master.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When there are speculative tasks in the stage, running progress bar could overflow and goes hidden on a new line:
![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/4317392/11326841/5fd3482e-9142-11e5-8ca5-cb2f0c0c8964.png)
3 completed / 2 running (including 1 speculative) out of 4 total tasks
This is a simple fix by capping the started tasks at `total - completed` tasks
![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/4317392/11326842/6bb67260-9142-11e5-90f0-37f9174878ec.png)
I should note my preferred way to fix it is via css style
```css
.progress { display: flex; }
```
which shifts the correction burden from driver to web browser. However I couldn't get selenium test to measure the position/dimension of the progress bar correctly to get this unit tested.
It also has the side effect that the width will be calibrated so the running occupies 2 / 5 instead of 1 / 4.
![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/4317392/11326848/7b03e9f0-9142-11e5-89ad-bd99cb0647cf.png)
All in all, since this cosmetic bug is minor enough, I suppose the original simple fix should be good enough.
Author: Forest Fang <forest.fang@outlook.com>
Closes #9896 from saurfang/progressbar.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This change abstracts the code that serves jars / files to executors so that
each RpcEnv can have its own implementation; the akka version uses the existing
HTTP-based file serving mechanism, while the netty versions uses the new
stream support added to the network lib, which makes file transfers benefit
from the easier security configuration of the network library, and should also
reduce overhead overall.
The change includes a small fix to TransportChannelHandler so that it propagates
user events to downstream handlers.
Author: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
Closes #9530 from vanzin/SPARK-11140.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In PersistenceEngineSuite, we do not call `close()` on the PersistenceEngine at the end of the test. For the ZooKeeperPersistenceEngine, this causes us to leak a ZooKeeper client, causing the logs of unrelated tests to be periodically spammed with connection error messages from that client:
```
15/11/20 05:13:35.789 pool-1-thread-1-ScalaTest-running-PersistenceEngineSuite-SendThread(localhost:15741) INFO ClientCnxn: Opening socket connection to server localhost/127.0.0.1:15741. Will not attempt to authenticate using SASL (unknown error)
15/11/20 05:13:35.790 pool-1-thread-1-ScalaTest-running-PersistenceEngineSuite-SendThread(localhost:15741) WARN ClientCnxn: Session 0x15124ff48dd0000 for server null, unexpected error, closing socket connection and attempting reconnect
java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused
at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.checkConnect(Native Method)
at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.finishConnect(SocketChannelImpl.java:739)
at org.apache.zookeeper.ClientCnxnSocketNIO.doTransport(ClientCnxnSocketNIO.java:350)
at org.apache.zookeeper.ClientCnxn$SendThread.run(ClientCnxn.java:1068)
```
This patch fixes this by using a `finally` block.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes #9864 from JoshRosen/close-zookeeper-client-in-tests.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch reduces some RPC timeouts in order to speed up the slow "AkkaUtilsSuite.remote fetch ssl on - untrusted server", which used to take two minutes to run.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes #9869 from JoshRosen/SPARK-11650.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
correctly checkpointed
To make sure that all lineage is correctly truncated for TrackStateRDD when checkpointed.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes #9831 from tdas/SPARK-11845.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Use port 0 to fix port-contention-related flakiness
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes #9841 from zsxwing/SPARK-11831.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
SparkListenerSuite's _"onTaskGettingResult() called when result fetched remotely"_ test was extremely slow (1 to 4 minutes to run) and recently became extremely flaky, frequently failing with OutOfMemoryError.
The root cause was the fact that this was using `System.setProperty` to set the Akka frame size, which was not actually modifying the frame size. As a result, this test would allocate much more data than necessary. The fix here is to simply use SparkConf in order to configure the frame size.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes #9822 from JoshRosen/SPARK-11649.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
[SPARK-6028](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-6028) uses network module to implement RPC. However, there are some configurations named with `spark.shuffle` prefix in the network module.
This PR refactors them to make sure the user can control them in shuffle and RPC separately. The user can use `spark.rpc.*` to set the configuration for netty RPC.
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes #9481 from zsxwing/SPARK-10745.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
and make estimatedSize return Long instead of Option[Long]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11792
The main changes include:
* Renaming `SizeEstimation` to `KnownSizeEstimation`. Hopefully this new name has more information.
* Making `estimatedSize` return `Long` instead of `Option[Long]`.
* In `UnsaveHashedRelation`, `estimatedSize` will delegate the work to `SizeEstimator` if we have not created a `BytesToBytesMap`.
Since we will put `UnsaveHashedRelation` to `BlockManager`, it is generally good to let it provide a more accurate size estimation. Also, if we do not put `BytesToBytesMap` directly into `BlockerManager`, I feel it is not really necessary to make `BytesToBytesMap` extends `KnownSizeEstimation`.
Author: Yin Huai <yhuai@databricks.com>
Closes #9813 from yhuai/SPARK-11792-followup.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Make sure we are using the context classloader when deserializing failed TaskResults instead of the Spark classloader.
The issue is that `enqueueFailedTask` was using the incorrect classloader which results in `ClassNotFoundException`.
Adds a test in TaskResultGetterSuite that compiles a custom exception, throws it on the executor, and asserts that Spark handles the TaskResult deserialization instead of returning `UnknownReason`.
See #9367 for previous comments
See SPARK-11195 for a full repro
Author: Hurshal Patel <hpatel516@gmail.com>
Closes #9779 from choochootrain/spark-11195-master.
|