| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ArrayBuffer.append(A) in performance critical paths
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We should generally use `ArrayBuffer.+=(A)` rather than `ArrayBuffer.append(A)`, because `append(A)` would involve extra boxing / unboxing.
## How was this patch tested?
N/A
Author: Liwei Lin <lwlin7@gmail.com>
Closes #14914 from lw-lin/append_to_plus_eq_v2.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
No idea why it was failing (the needed import was there), but
this makes things work.
Author: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
Closes #14925 from vanzin/SPARK-16533.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pull request reverts the changes made as a part of #14605, which simply side-steps the deadlock issue. Instead, I propose the following approach:
* Use `scheduleWithFixedDelay` when calling `ExecutorAllocationManager.schedule` for scheduling executor requests. The intent of this is that if invocations are delayed beyond the default schedule interval on account of lock contention, then we avoid a situation where calls to `schedule` are made back-to-back, potentially releasing and then immediately reacquiring these locks - further exacerbating contention.
* Replace a number of calls to `askWithRetry` with `ask` inside of message handling code in `CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend` and its ilk. This allows us queue messages with the relevant endpoints, release whatever locks we might be holding, and then block whilst awaiting the response. This change is made at the cost of being able to retry should sending the message fail, as retrying outside of the lock could easily cause race conditions if other conflicting messages have been sent whilst awaiting a response. I believe this to be the lesser of two evils, as in many cases these RPC calls are to process local components, and so failures are more likely to be deterministic, and timeouts are more likely to be caused by lock contention.
## How was this patch tested?
Existing tests, and manual tests under yarn-client mode.
Author: Angus Gerry <angolon@gmail.com>
Closes #14710 from angolon/SPARK-16533.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The master is broken because #14882 didn't run mesos tests.
## How was this patch tested?
Jenkins unit tests.
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes #14902 from zsxwing/hotfix.
|
|
|
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Move Mesos code into a mvn module
## How was this patch tested?
unit tests
manually submitting a client mode and cluster mode job
spark/mesos integration test suite
Author: Michael Gummelt <mgummelt@mesosphere.io>
Closes #14637 from mgummelt/mesos-module.
|
