| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Author: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
Closes #10582 from vanzin/SPARK-3873-tests.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PythonDStream.registerSerializer is called only once
There is an issue that Py4J's PythonProxyHandler.finalize blocks forever. (https://github.com/bartdag/py4j/pull/184)
Py4j will create a PythonProxyHandler in Java for "transformer_serializer" when calling "registerSerializer". If we call "registerSerializer" twice, the second PythonProxyHandler will override the first one, then the first one will be GCed and trigger "PythonProxyHandler.finalize". To avoid that, we should not call"registerSerializer" more than once, so that "PythonProxyHandler" in Java side won't be GCed.
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes #10514 from zsxwing/SPARK-12511.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
create a separate thread to wait for the job result
Before #9264, submitJob would create a separate thread to wait for the job result. `submitJobThreadPool` was a workaround in `ReceiverTracker` to run these waiting-job-result threads. Now #9264 has been merged to master and resolved this blocking issue, `submitJobThreadPool` can be removed now.
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes #10560 from zsxwing/remove-submitJobThreadPool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Explicitly close client side socket connection before restart socket receiver.
Author: guoxu1231 <guoxu1231@gmail.com>
Author: Shawn Guo <guoxu1231@gmail.com>
Closes #10464 from guoxu1231/SPARK-12513.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
and reflection that supported 1.x
Remove use of deprecated Hadoop APIs now that 2.2+ is required
Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
Closes #10446 from srowen/SPARK-12481.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also included a few miscelaneous other modules that had very few violations.
Author: Marcelo Vanzin <vanzin@cloudera.com>
Closes #10532 from vanzin/SPARK-3873-streaming.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
suites after forcing to set specific value to "os.arch" property
Restore the original value of os.arch property after each test
Since some of tests forced to set the specific value to os.arch property, we need to set the original value.
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closes #10289 from kiszk/SPARK-12311.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes #10424 from zsxwing/typo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
Closes #10387 from rxin/version-bump.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
recovering from checkpoint data
Add a transient flag `DStream.restoredFromCheckpointData` to control the restore processing in DStream to avoid duplicate works: check this flag first in `DStream.restoreCheckpointData`, only when `false`, the restore process will be executed.
Author: jhu-chang <gt.hu.chang@gmail.com>
Closes #9765 from jhu-chang/SPARK-11749.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
String.split accepts a regular expression, so we should escape "." and "|".
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes #10361 from zsxwing/reg-bug.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
…endly Receiver graphs
Currently, the Spark Streaming web UI uses the same maxY when displays 'Input Rate Times& Histograms' and 'Per-Receiver Times& Histograms'.
This may lead to somewhat un-friendly graphs: once we have tens of Receivers or more, every 'Per-Receiver Times' line almost hits the ground.
This issue proposes to calculate a new maxY against the original one, which is shared among all the `Per-Receiver Times& Histograms' graphs.
Before:
![before-5](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/15843379/11761362/d790c356-a0fa-11e5-860e-4b834603de1d.png)
After:
![after-5](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/15843379/11761361/cfabf692-a0fa-11e5-97d0-4ad124aaca2a.png)
Author: proflin <proflin.me@gmail.com>
Closes #10318 from proflin/SPARK-12304.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
cc\ tdas zsxwing , please review. Thanks a lot.
Author: jerryshao <sshao@hortonworks.com>
Closes #10305 from jerryshao/fix-typo-state-impl.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently the Streaming web UI does NOT list Receivers in order; however, it seems more convenient for the users if Receivers are listed in order.
![spark-12273](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/15843379/11736602/0bb7f7a8-a00b-11e5-8e86-96ba9297fb12.png)
Author: proflin <proflin.me@gmail.com>
Closes #10264 from proflin/Spark-12273.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Adding ability to define an initial state RDD for use with updateStateByKey PySpark. Added unit test and changed stateful_network_wordcount example to use initial RDD.
Author: Bryan Cutler <bjcutler@us.ibm.com>
Closes #10082 from BryanCutler/initial-rdd-updateStateByKey-SPARK-11713.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
suffix parameters
The original code does not properly handle the cases where the prefix is null, but suffix is not null - the suffix should be used but is not.
The fix is using StringBuilder to construct the proper file name.
Author: bomeng <bmeng@us.ibm.com>
Author: Bo Meng <mengbo@bos-macbook-pro.usca.ibm.com>
Closes #10185 from bomeng/SPARK-12136.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
and change tracking function signature
SPARK-12244:
Based on feedback from early users and personal experience attempting to explain it, the name trackStateByKey had two problem.
"trackState" is a completely new term which really does not give any intuition on what the operation is
the resultant data stream of objects returned by the function is called in docs as the "emitted" data for the lack of a better.
"mapWithState" makes sense because the API is like a mapping function like (Key, Value) => T with State as an additional parameter. The resultant data stream is "mapped data". So both problems are solved.
SPARK-12245:
From initial experiences, not having the key in the function makes it hard to return mapped stuff, as the whole information of the records is not there. Basically the user is restricted to doing something like mapValue() instead of map(). So adding the key as a parameter.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes #10224 from tdas/rename.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
present
The reason is that TrackStateRDDs generated by trackStateByKey expect the previous batch's TrackStateRDDs to have a partitioner. However, when recovery from DStream checkpoints, the RDDs recovered from RDD checkpoints do not have a partitioner attached to it. This is because RDD checkpoints do not preserve the partitioner (SPARK-12004).
While #9983 solves SPARK-12004 by preserving the partitioner through RDD checkpoints, there may be a non-zero chance that the saving and recovery fails. To be resilient, this PR repartitions the previous state RDD if the partitioner is not detected.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes #9988 from tdas/SPARK-11932.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Jenkins load is high
We need to make sure that the last entry is indeed the last entry in the queue.
Author: Burak Yavuz <brkyvz@gmail.com>
Closes #10110 from brkyvz/batch-wal-test-fix.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`ByteBuffer` doesn't guarantee all contents in `ByteBuffer.array` are valid. E.g, a ByteBuffer returned by `ByteBuffer.slice`. We should not use the whole content of `ByteBuffer` unless we know that's correct.
This patch fixed all places that use `ByteBuffer.array` incorrectly.
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes #10083 from zsxwing/bytebuffer-array.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This replaces https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9696
Invoke Checkstyle and print any errors to the console, failing the step.
Use Google's style rules modified according to
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Spark+Code+Style+Guide
Some important checks are disabled (see TODOs in `checkstyle.xml`) due to
multiple violations being present in the codebase.
Suggest fixing those TODOs in a separate PR(s).
More on Checkstyle can be found on the [official website](http://checkstyle.sourceforge.net/).
Sample output (from [build 46345](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46345/consoleFull)) (duplicated because I run the build twice with different profiles):
> Checkstyle checks failed at following occurrences:
[ERROR] src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/UnsafeRowParquetRecordReader.java:[217,7] (coding) MissingSwitchDefault: switch without "default" clause.
> [ERROR] src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/SpecificParquetRecordReaderBase.java:[198,10] (modifier) ModifierOrder: 'protected' modifier out of order with the JLS suggestions.
> [ERROR] src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/UnsafeRowParquetRecordReader.java:[217,7] (coding) MissingSwitchDefault: switch without "default" clause.
> [ERROR] src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/SpecificParquetRecordReaderBase.java:[198,10] (modifier) ModifierOrder: 'protected' modifier out of order with the JLS suggestions.
> [error] running /home/jenkins/workspace/SparkPullRequestBuilder2/dev/lint-java ; received return code 1
Also fix some of the minor violations that didn't require sweeping changes.
Apologies for the previous botched PRs - I finally figured out the issue.
cr: JoshRosen, pwendell
> I state that the contribution is my original work, and I license the work to the project under the project's open source license.
Author: Dmitry Erastov <derastov@gmail.com>
Closes #9867 from dskrvk/master.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
recovering StreamingContext from checkpoint
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes #10127 from tdas/SPARK-12122.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
after test
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes #10124 from tdas/InputStreamSuite-flaky-test.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If `StreamingContext.stop()` is interrupted midway through the call, the context will be marked as stopped but certain state will have not been cleaned up. Because `state = STOPPED` will be set, subsequent `stop()` calls will be unable to finish stopping the context, preventing any new StreamingContexts from being created.
This patch addresses this issue by only marking the context as `STOPPED` once the `stop()` has successfully completed which allows `stop()` to be called a second time in order to finish stopping the context in case the original `stop()` call was interrupted.
I discovered this issue by examining logs from a failed Jenkins run in which this race condition occurred in `FailureSuite`, leaking an unstoppable context and causing all subsequent tests to fail.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes #9982 from JoshRosen/SPARK-12001.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The JobConf object created in `DStream.saveAsHadoopFiles` is used concurrently in multiple places:
* The JobConf is updated by `RDD.saveAsHadoopFile()` before the job is launched
* The JobConf is serialized as part of the DStream checkpoints.
These concurrent accesses (updating in one thread, while the another thread is serializing it) can lead to concurrentModidicationException in the underlying Java hashmap using in the internal Hadoop Configuration object.
The solution is to create a new JobConf in every batch, that is updated by `RDD.saveAsHadoopFile()`, while the checkpointing serializes the original JobConf.
Tests to be added in #9988 will fail reliably without this patch. Keeping this patch really small to make sure that it can be added to previous branches.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes #10088 from tdas/SPARK-12087.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR backports PR #10039 to master
Author: Cheng Lian <lian@databricks.com>
Closes #10063 from liancheng/spark-12046.doc-fix.master.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
StreamingListenerSuite
In StreamingListenerSuite."don't call ssc.stop in listener", after the main thread calls `ssc.stop()`, `StreamingContextStoppingCollector` may call `ssc.stop()` in the listener bus thread, which is a dead-lock. This PR updated `StreamingContextStoppingCollector` to only call `ssc.stop()` in the first batch to avoid the dead-lock.
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes #10011 from zsxwing/fix-test-deadlock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
TransformFunctionSerializer to Java
The Python exception track in TransformFunction and TransformFunctionSerializer is not sent back to Java. Py4j just throws a very general exception, which is hard to debug.
This PRs adds `getFailure` method to get the failure message in Java side.
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes #9922 from zsxwing/SPARK-11935.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
recovered from checkpoint file
This solves the following exception caused when empty state RDD is checkpointed and recovered. The root cause is that an empty OpenHashMapBasedStateMap cannot be deserialized as the initialCapacity is set to zero.
```
Job aborted due to stage failure: Task 0 in stage 6.0 failed 1 times, most recent failure: Lost task 0.0 in stage 6.0 (TID 20, localhost): java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: requirement failed: Invalid initial capacity
at scala.Predef$.require(Predef.scala:233)
at org.apache.spark.streaming.util.OpenHashMapBasedStateMap.<init>(StateMap.scala:96)
at org.apache.spark.streaming.util.OpenHashMapBasedStateMap.<init>(StateMap.scala:86)
at org.apache.spark.streaming.util.OpenHashMapBasedStateMap.readObject(StateMap.scala:291)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.invokeReadObject(ObjectStreamClass.java:1017)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readSerialData(ObjectInputStream.java:1893)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(ObjectInputStream.java:1798)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1350)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.defaultReadFields(ObjectInputStream.java:1990)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readSerialData(ObjectInputStream.java:1915)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(ObjectInputStream.java:1798)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1350)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(ObjectInputStream.java:370)
at org.apache.spark.serializer.JavaDeserializationStream.readObject(JavaSerializer.scala:76)
at org.apache.spark.serializer.DeserializationStream$$anon$1.getNext(Serializer.scala:181)
at org.apache.spark.util.NextIterator.hasNext(NextIterator.scala:73)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$13.hasNext(Iterator.scala:371)
at scala.collection.Iterator$class.foreach(Iterator.scala:727)
at scala.collection.AbstractIterator.foreach(Iterator.scala:1157)
at scala.collection.generic.Growable$class.$plus$plus$eq(Growable.scala:48)
at scala.collection.mutable.ArrayBuffer.$plus$plus$eq(ArrayBuffer.scala:103)
at scala.collection.mutable.ArrayBuffer.$plus$plus$eq(ArrayBuffer.scala:47)
at scala.collection.TraversableOnce$class.to(TraversableOnce.scala:273)
at scala.collection.AbstractIterator.to(Iterator.scala:1157)
at scala.collection.TraversableOnce$class.toBuffer(TraversableOnce.scala:265)
at scala.collection.AbstractIterator.toBuffer(Iterator.scala:1157)
at scala.collection.TraversableOnce$class.toArray(TraversableOnce.scala:252)
at scala.collection.AbstractIterator.toArray(Iterator.scala:1157)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD$$anonfun$collect$1$$anonfun$12.apply(RDD.scala:921)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD$$anonfun$collect$1$$anonfun$12.apply(RDD.scala:921)
at org.apache.spark.SparkContext$$anonfun$runJob$5.apply(SparkContext.scala:1858)
at org.apache.spark.SparkContext$$anonfun$runJob$5.apply(SparkContext.scala:1858)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.ResultTask.runTask(ResultTask.scala:66)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:88)
at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:214)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)
```
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes #9958 from tdas/SPARK-11979.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`FileBasedWriteAheadLog.close()`
There is a race condition in `FileBasedWriteAheadLog.close()`, where if delete's of old log files are in progress, the write ahead log may close, and result in a `RejectedExecutionException`. This is okay, and should be handled gracefully.
Example test failures:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/Spark-1.6-SBT/AMPLAB_JENKINS_BUILD_PROFILE=hadoop1.0,label=spark-test/95/testReport/junit/org.apache.spark.streaming.util/BatchedWriteAheadLogWithCloseFileAfterWriteSuite/BatchedWriteAheadLog___clean_old_logs/
The reason the test fails is in `afterEach`, `writeAheadLog.close` is called, and there may still be async deletes in flight.
tdas zsxwing
Author: Burak Yavuz <brkyvz@gmail.com>
Closes #9953 from brkyvz/flaky-ss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
correctly checkpointed
To make sure that all lineage is correctly truncated for TrackStateRDD when checkpointed.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes #9831 from tdas/SPARK-11845.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
stack trace of failure:
```
org.scalatest.exceptions.TestFailedDueToTimeoutException: The code passed to eventually never returned normally. Attempted 62 times over 1.006322071 seconds. Last failure message:
Argument(s) are different! Wanted:
writeAheadLog.write(
java.nio.HeapByteBuffer[pos=0 lim=124 cap=124],
10
);
-> at org.apache.spark.streaming.util.BatchedWriteAheadLogSuite$$anonfun$23$$anonfun$apply$mcV$sp$15.apply(WriteAheadLogSuite.scala:518)
Actual invocation has different arguments:
writeAheadLog.write(
java.nio.HeapByteBuffer[pos=0 lim=124 cap=124],
10
);
-> at org.apache.spark.streaming.util.WriteAheadLogSuite$BlockingWriteAheadLog.write(WriteAheadLogSuite.scala:756)
```
I believe the issue was that due to a race condition, the ordering of the events could be messed up in the final ByteBuffer, therefore the comparison fails.
By adding eventually between the requests, we make sure the ordering is preserved. Note that in real life situations, the ordering across threads will not matter.
Another solution would be to implement a custom mockito matcher that sorts and then compares the results, but that kind of sounds like overkill to me. Let me know what you think tdas zsxwing
Author: Burak Yavuz <brkyvz@gmail.com>
Closes #9790 from brkyvz/fix-flaky-2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
DStream checkpoint interval is by default set at max(10 second, batch interval). That's bad for large batch intervals where the checkpoint interval = batch interval, and RDDs get checkpointed every batch.
This PR is to set the checkpoint interval of trackStateByKey to 10 * batch duration.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes #9805 from tdas/SPARK-11814.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
static analysis
The HP Fortify Opens Source Review team (https://www.hpfod.com/open-source-review-project) reported a handful of potential resource leaks that were discovered using their static analysis tool. We should fix the issues identified by their scan.
Author: Josh Rosen <joshrosen@databricks.com>
Closes #9455 from JoshRosen/fix-potential-resource-leaks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
accept a VoidFunction<...>
Currently streaming foreachRDD Java API uses a function prototype requiring a return value of null. This PR deprecates the old method and uses VoidFunction to allow for more concise declaration. Also added VoidFunction2 to Java API in order to use in Streaming methods. Unit test is added for using foreachRDD with VoidFunction, and changes have been tested with Java 7 and Java 8 using lambdas.
Author: Bryan Cutler <bjcutler@us.ibm.com>
Closes #9488 from BryanCutler/foreachRDD-VoidFunction-SPARK-4557.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
bus's thread
See discussion toward the tail of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9723
From zsxwing :
```
The user should not call stop or other long-time work in a listener since it will block the listener thread, and prevent from stopping SparkContext/StreamingContext.
I cannot see an approach since we need to stop the listener bus's thread before stopping SparkContext/StreamingContext totally.
```
Proposed solution is to prevent the call to StreamingContext#stop() in the listener bus's thread.
Author: tedyu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
Closes #9741 from tedyu/master.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We will do checkpoint when generating a batch and completing a batch. When the processing time of a batch is greater than the batch interval, checkpointing for completing an old batch may run after checkpointing for generating a new batch. If this happens, checkpoint of an old batch actually has the latest information, so we want to recovery from it. This PR will use the latest checkpoint time as the file name, so that we can always recovery from the latest checkpoint file.
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes #9707 from zsxwing/fix-checkpoint.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
<img width="1365" alt="screen shot 2015-11-13 at 9 57 43 pm" src="https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/1000778/11162322/9b88e204-8a51-11e5-8c57-a44889cab713.png">
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes #9711 from zsxwing/failure-info.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Author: Daniel Jalova <djalova@us.ibm.com>
Closes #9186 from djalova/SPARK-6328.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Using batching on the driver for the WriteAheadLog should be an improvement for all environments and use cases. Users will be able to scale to much higher number of receivers with the BatchedWriteAheadLog. Therefore we should turn it on by default, and QA it in the QA period.
I've also added some tests to make sure the default configurations are correct regarding recent additions:
- batching on by default
- closeFileAfterWrite off by default
- parallelRecovery off by default
Author: Burak Yavuz <brkyvz@gmail.com>
Closes #9695 from brkyvz/enable-batch-wal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
…od should be enabled' Scala warnings
Author: Gábor Lipták <gliptak@gmail.com>
Closes #9550 from gliptak/SPARK-11573.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
not updated
Bug: Timestamp is not updated if there is data but the corresponding state is not updated. This is wrong, and timeout is defined as "no data for a while", not "not state update for a while".
Fix: Update timestamp when timestamp when timeout is specified, otherwise no need.
Also refactored the code for better testability and added unit tests.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes #9648 from tdas/SPARK-11681.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
minor recovery tweaks
The support for closing WriteAheadLog files after writes was just merged in. Closing every file after a write is a very expensive operation as it creates many small files on S3. It's not necessary to enable it on HDFS anyway.
However, when you have many small files on S3, recovery takes very long. In addition, files start stacking up pretty quickly, and deletes may not be able to keep up, therefore deletes can also be parallelized.
This PR adds support for the two parallelization steps mentioned above, in addition to a couple more failures I encountered during recovery.
Author: Burak Yavuz <brkyvz@gmail.com>
Closes #9373 from brkyvz/par-recovery.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
TODO
- [x] Add Java API
- [x] Add API tests
- [x] Add a function test
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes #9636 from zsxwing/java-track.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Should not create SparkContext in the constructor of `TrackStateRDDSuite`. This is a follow up PR for #9256 to fix the test for maven build.
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Closes #9668 from zsxwing/hotfix.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
testing the BatchedWriteAheadLog
Several elements could be drained if the main thread is not fast enough. zsxwing warned me about a similar problem, but missed it here :( Submitting the fix using a waiter.
cc tdas
Author: Burak Yavuz <brkyvz@gmail.com>
Closes #9605 from brkyvz/fix-flaky-test.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Current updateStateByKey provides stateful processing in Spark Streaming. It allows the user to maintain per-key state and manage that state using an updateFunction. The updateFunction is called for each key, and it uses new data and existing state of the key, to generate an updated state. However, based on community feedback, we have learnt the following lessons.
* Need for more optimized state management that does not scan every key
* Need to make it easier to implement common use cases - (a) timeout of idle data, (b) returning items other than state
The high level idea that of this PR
* Introduce a new API trackStateByKey that, allows the user to update per-key state, and emit arbitrary records. The new API is necessary as this will have significantly different semantics than the existing updateStateByKey API. This API will have direct support for timeouts.
* Internally, the system will keep the state data as a map/list within the partitions of the state RDDs. The new data RDDs will be partitioned appropriately, and for all the key-value data, it will lookup the map/list in the state RDD partition and create a new list/map of updated state data. The new state RDD partition will be created based on the update data and if necessary, with old data.
Here is the detailed design doc. Please take a look and provide feedback as comments.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NoALLyd83zGs1hNGMm0Pc5YOVgiPpMHugGMk6COqxxE/edit#heading=h.ph3w0clkd4em
This is still WIP. Major things left to be done.
- [x] Implement basic functionality of state tracking, with initial RDD and timeouts
- [x] Unit tests for state tracking
- [x] Unit tests for initial RDD and timeout
- [ ] Unit tests for TrackStateRDD
- [x] state creating, updating, removing
- [ ] emitting
- [ ] checkpointing
- [x] Misc unit tests for State, TrackStateSpec, etc.
- [x] Update docs and experimental tags
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes #9256 from tdas/trackStateByKey.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
DStream.foreachRDD and DStream.transform in DAG viz
Currently, when a DStream sets the scope for RDD generated by it, that scope is not allowed to be overridden by the RDD operations. So in case of `DStream.foreachRDD`, all the RDDs generated inside the foreachRDD get the same scope - `foreachRDD <time>`, as set by the `ForeachDStream`. So it is hard to debug generated RDDs in the RDD DAG viz in the Spark UI.
This patch allows the RDD operations inside `DStream.transform` and `DStream.foreachRDD` to append their own scopes to the earlier DStream scope.
I have also slightly tweaked how callsites are set such that the short callsite reflects the RDD operation name and line number. This tweak is necessary as callsites are not managed through scopes (which support nesting and overriding) and I didnt want to add another local property to control nesting and overriding of callsites.
## Before:
![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/663212/10808548/fa71c0c4-7da9-11e5-9af0-5737793a146f.png)
## After:
![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/663212/10808659/37bc45b6-7dab-11e5-8041-c20be6a9bc26.png)
The code that was used to generate this is:
```
val lines = ssc.socketTextStream(args(0), args(1).toInt, StorageLevel.MEMORY_AND_DISK_SER)
val words = lines.flatMap(_.split(" "))
val wordCounts = words.map(x => (x, 1)).reduceByKey(_ + _)
wordCounts.foreachRDD { rdd =>
val temp = rdd.map { _ -> 1 }.reduceByKey( _ + _)
val temp2 = temp.map { _ -> 1}.reduceByKey(_ + _)
val count = temp2.count
println(count)
}
```
Note
- The inner scopes of the RDD operations map/reduceByKey inside foreachRDD is visible
- The short callsites of stages refers to the line number of the RDD ops rather than the same line number of foreachRDD in all three cases.
Author: Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1565@gmail.com>
Closes #9315 from tdas/SPARK-11361.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
While sbt successfully compiles as it properly pulls the mockito dependency, maven builds have broken. We need this in ASAP.
tdas
Author: Burak Yavuz <brkyvz@gmail.com>
Closes #9584 from brkyvz/fix-master.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Expose executorId to `ReceiverInfo` and UI since it's helpful when there are multiple executors running in the same host. Screenshot:
<img width="1058" alt="screen shot 2015-11-02 at 10 52 19 am" src="https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/1000778/10890968/2e2f5512-8150-11e5-8d9d-746e826b69e8.png">
Author: Shixiong Zhu <shixiong@databricks.com>
Author: zsxwing <zsxwing@gmail.com>
Closes #9418 from zsxwing/SPARK-11333.
|