diff options
author | patacongo <patacongo@42af7a65-404d-4744-a932-0658087f49c3> | 2011-06-17 15:17:28 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | patacongo <patacongo@42af7a65-404d-4744-a932-0658087f49c3> | 2011-06-17 15:17:28 +0000 |
commit | dd1702a98798f19b90e4e8d0bf8f513bd904e4f4 (patch) | |
tree | 1d05a89c7c2e4fe9631bfbdfcf1c8d5460bb785d /nuttx/TODO | |
parent | 9f16736bd90a3baeb6635c6f527798635bfd8dd3 (diff) | |
download | px4-nuttx-dd1702a98798f19b90e4e8d0bf8f513bd904e4f4.tar.gz px4-nuttx-dd1702a98798f19b90e4e8d0bf8f513bd904e4f4.tar.bz2 px4-nuttx-dd1702a98798f19b90e4e8d0bf8f513bd904e4f4.zip |
Add Teensy NSH config; remove unusable AVR ostest configs
git-svn-id: svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/nuttx/code/trunk@3718 42af7a65-404d-4744-a932-0658087f49c3
Diffstat (limited to 'nuttx/TODO')
-rw-r--r-- | nuttx/TODO | 19 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/nuttx/TODO b/nuttx/TODO index 48bf49e89..8c160adc9 100644 --- a/nuttx/TODO +++ b/nuttx/TODO @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -NuttX TODO List (Last updated June 16, 2011) +NuttX TODO List (Last updated June 17, 2011) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ nuttx/ @@ -888,6 +888,8 @@ o AVR (arch/avr) have a compatible AVR emulator to check things out in detail. I am thinking that there is some fuse setting that divides the input clock by 8??? but that is just a fantasy. + Update: No, something else is wrong; the Teensy AT90USB behaves in + exactly the same way. Status: Open Priority: Low. Setting the terminal BAUD to 4800 solves the issues. However, I suspect that this means that there are other lurking timing issues @@ -900,13 +902,16 @@ o AVR (arch/avr) Priority: The priority might as well be low since there is nothing I can do about it anyway. - Description: There is a OS test configuratin for the Micropendous AT90USB at - configs/micropendous3. However, as currently configured it will not - fit into the AT90USB memory. Some tuning and scaling is required and - obviously this configuration is untested. + Description: Many printf-intensive examples (such as the OS test) cannot be executed + on most AVR platforms. The reason is because these tests/examples + generate a lot of string data. The build system currently places all + string data in RAM and the string data can easily overflow the tiny + SRAMs on these parts. A solution would be to put the string data + into the more abundant FLASH memory, but this would require modification + to the printf logic to access the strings from program memory. Status: Open - Priority: Low for me because the AT90USB647 is not a very interesting target to - me because of its limited memory capability./ + Priority: Low. The AVR is probably not the architecuture that you want to use + for extensive string operations. o Intel x86 (arch/x86) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |