summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/nuttx/TODO
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorpatacongo <patacongo@42af7a65-404d-4744-a932-0658087f49c3>2011-06-17 15:17:28 +0000
committerpatacongo <patacongo@42af7a65-404d-4744-a932-0658087f49c3>2011-06-17 15:17:28 +0000
commitdd1702a98798f19b90e4e8d0bf8f513bd904e4f4 (patch)
tree1d05a89c7c2e4fe9631bfbdfcf1c8d5460bb785d /nuttx/TODO
parent9f16736bd90a3baeb6635c6f527798635bfd8dd3 (diff)
downloadpx4-nuttx-dd1702a98798f19b90e4e8d0bf8f513bd904e4f4.tar.gz
px4-nuttx-dd1702a98798f19b90e4e8d0bf8f513bd904e4f4.tar.bz2
px4-nuttx-dd1702a98798f19b90e4e8d0bf8f513bd904e4f4.zip
Add Teensy NSH config; remove unusable AVR ostest configs
git-svn-id: svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/nuttx/code/trunk@3718 42af7a65-404d-4744-a932-0658087f49c3
Diffstat (limited to 'nuttx/TODO')
-rw-r--r--nuttx/TODO19
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/nuttx/TODO b/nuttx/TODO
index 48bf49e89..8c160adc9 100644
--- a/nuttx/TODO
+++ b/nuttx/TODO
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-NuttX TODO List (Last updated June 16, 2011)
+NuttX TODO List (Last updated June 17, 2011)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
nuttx/
@@ -888,6 +888,8 @@ o AVR (arch/avr)
have a compatible AVR emulator to check things out in detail. I am
thinking that there is some fuse setting that divides the input clock
by 8??? but that is just a fantasy.
+ Update: No, something else is wrong; the Teensy AT90USB behaves in
+ exactly the same way.
Status: Open
Priority: Low. Setting the terminal BAUD to 4800 solves the issues. However,
I suspect that this means that there are other lurking timing issues
@@ -900,13 +902,16 @@ o AVR (arch/avr)
Priority: The priority might as well be low since there is nothing I can do about
it anyway.
- Description: There is a OS test configuratin for the Micropendous AT90USB at
- configs/micropendous3. However, as currently configured it will not
- fit into the AT90USB memory. Some tuning and scaling is required and
- obviously this configuration is untested.
+ Description: Many printf-intensive examples (such as the OS test) cannot be executed
+ on most AVR platforms. The reason is because these tests/examples
+ generate a lot of string data. The build system currently places all
+ string data in RAM and the string data can easily overflow the tiny
+ SRAMs on these parts. A solution would be to put the string data
+ into the more abundant FLASH memory, but this would require modification
+ to the printf logic to access the strings from program memory.
Status: Open
- Priority: Low for me because the AT90USB647 is not a very interesting target to
- me because of its limited memory capability./
+ Priority: Low. The AVR is probably not the architecuture that you want to use
+ for extensive string operations.
o Intel x86 (arch/x86)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^