diff options
author | patacongo <patacongo@42af7a65-404d-4744-a932-0658087f49c3> | 2007-11-23 22:32:52 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | patacongo <patacongo@42af7a65-404d-4744-a932-0658087f49c3> | 2007-11-23 22:32:52 +0000 |
commit | 2937aaaaf09c2f0d5b46b1a2a30eac962d8455d3 (patch) | |
tree | 4c931c8603e4c674f6eec802044b430a953536db /nuttx/arch/sim | |
parent | fa64306fac12fed8522ab0facdb2cd7f211b2d30 (diff) | |
download | px4-nuttx-2937aaaaf09c2f0d5b46b1a2a30eac962d8455d3.tar.gz px4-nuttx-2937aaaaf09c2f0d5b46b1a2a30eac962d8455d3.tar.bz2 px4-nuttx-2937aaaaf09c2f0d5b46b1a2a30eac962d8455d3.zip |
Debug can now be selectively enabled by subystem
git-svn-id: svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/nuttx/code/trunk@404 42af7a65-404d-4744-a932-0658087f49c3
Diffstat (limited to 'nuttx/arch/sim')
-rw-r--r-- | nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_blocktask.c | 6 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_deviceimage.c | 6 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_exit.c | 6 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_releasepending.c | 6 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_reprioritizertr.c | 6 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_unblocktask.c | 6 |
6 files changed, 18 insertions, 18 deletions
diff --git a/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_blocktask.c b/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_blocktask.c index 66cd89372..ad432fa02 100644 --- a/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_blocktask.c +++ b/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_blocktask.c @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ void up_block_task(_TCB *tcb, tstate_t task_state) _TCB *rtcb = (_TCB*)g_readytorun.head; boolean switch_needed; - dbg("Blocking TCB=%p\n", tcb); + sdbg("Blocking TCB=%p\n", tcb); /* Remove the tcb task from the ready-to-run list. If we * are blocking the task at the head of the task list (the @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ void up_block_task(_TCB *tcb, tstate_t task_state) */ rtcb = (_TCB*)g_readytorun.head; - dbg("New Active Task TCB=%p\n", rtcb); + sdbg("New Active Task TCB=%p\n", rtcb); /* The way that we handle signals in the simulation is kind of * a kludge. This would be unsafe in a truly multi-threaded, interrupt @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ void up_block_task(_TCB *tcb, tstate_t task_state) if (rtcb->xcp.sigdeliver) { - dbg("Delivering signals TCB=%p\n", rtcb); + sdbg("Delivering signals TCB=%p\n", rtcb); ((sig_deliver_t)rtcb->xcp.sigdeliver)(rtcb); rtcb->xcp.sigdeliver = NULL; } diff --git a/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_deviceimage.c b/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_deviceimage.c index 70dfc9cab..ac728c7f5 100644 --- a/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_deviceimage.c +++ b/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_deviceimage.c @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ ****************************************************************************/ #ifdef VFAT_STANDALONE -# define dbg(format, arg...) printf(format, ##arg) +# define sdbg(format, arg...) printf(format, ##arg) #endif /**************************************************************************** @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ char *up_deviceimage(void) ret = inflateInit(&strm); if (ret != Z_OK) { - dbg("inflateInit FAILED: ret=%d msg=\"%s\"\n", ret, strm.msg ? strm.msg : "No message" ); + sdbg("inflateInit FAILED: ret=%d msg=\"%s\"\n", ret, strm.msg ? strm.msg : "No message" ); return NULL; } @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ char *up_deviceimage(void) case Z_DATA_ERROR: case Z_MEM_ERROR: case Z_STREAM_ERROR: - dbg("inflate FAILED: ret=%d msg=\"%s\"\n", ret, strm.msg ? strm.msg : "No message" ); + sdbg("inflate FAILED: ret=%d msg=\"%s\"\n", ret, strm.msg ? strm.msg : "No message" ); (void)inflateEnd(&strm); free(pbuffer); return NULL; diff --git a/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_exit.c b/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_exit.c index 650403b7e..8ab8f92cf 100644 --- a/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_exit.c +++ b/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_exit.c @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ void _exit(int status) { _TCB* tcb = (_TCB*)g_readytorun.head; - dbg("TCB=%p exitting\n", tcb); + sdbg("TCB=%p exitting\n", tcb); /* Remove the tcb task from the ready-to-run list. We can * ignore the return value because we know that a context @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ void _exit(int status) */ tcb = (_TCB*)g_readytorun.head; - dbg("New Active Task TCB=%p\n", tcb); + sdbg("New Active Task TCB=%p\n", tcb); /* The way that we handle signals in the simulation is kind of * a kludge. This would be unsafe in a truly multi-threaded, interrupt @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ void _exit(int status) if (tcb->xcp.sigdeliver) { - dbg("Delivering signals TCB=%p\n", tcb); + sdbg("Delivering signals TCB=%p\n", tcb); ((sig_deliver_t)tcb->xcp.sigdeliver)(tcb); tcb->xcp.sigdeliver = NULL; } diff --git a/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_releasepending.c b/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_releasepending.c index 8a494a354..5f25a0db6 100644 --- a/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_releasepending.c +++ b/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_releasepending.c @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ void up_release_pending(void) { _TCB *rtcb = (_TCB*)g_readytorun.head; - dbg("From TCB=%p\n", rtcb); + sdbg("From TCB=%p\n", rtcb); /* Merge the g_pendingtasks list into the g_readytorun task list */ @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ void up_release_pending(void) */ rtcb = (_TCB*)g_readytorun.head; - dbg("New Active Task TCB=%p\n", rtcb); + sdbg("New Active Task TCB=%p\n", rtcb); /* The way that we handle signals in the simulation is kind of * a kludge. This would be unsafe in a truly multi-threaded, interrupt @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ void up_release_pending(void) if (rtcb->xcp.sigdeliver) { - dbg("Delivering signals TCB=%p\n", rtcb); + sdbg("Delivering signals TCB=%p\n", rtcb); ((sig_deliver_t)rtcb->xcp.sigdeliver)(rtcb); rtcb->xcp.sigdeliver = NULL; } diff --git a/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_reprioritizertr.c b/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_reprioritizertr.c index d4d91a88e..f2a2b2828 100644 --- a/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_reprioritizertr.c +++ b/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_reprioritizertr.c @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ void up_reprioritize_rtr(_TCB *tcb, ubyte priority) _TCB *rtcb = (_TCB*)g_readytorun.head; boolean switch_needed; - dbg("TCB=%p PRI=%d\n", tcb, priority); + sdbg("TCB=%p PRI=%d\n", tcb, priority); /* Remove the tcb task from the ready-to-run list. * sched_removereadytorun will return TRUE if we just @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ void up_reprioritize_rtr(_TCB *tcb, ubyte priority) */ rtcb = (_TCB*)g_readytorun.head; - dbg("New Active Task TCB=%p\n", rtcb); + sdbg("New Active Task TCB=%p\n", rtcb); /* The way that we handle signals in the simulation is kind of * a kludge. This would be unsafe in a truly multi-threaded, interrupt @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ void up_reprioritize_rtr(_TCB *tcb, ubyte priority) if (rtcb->xcp.sigdeliver) { - dbg("Delivering signals TCB=%p\n", rtcb); + sdbg("Delivering signals TCB=%p\n", rtcb); ((sig_deliver_t)rtcb->xcp.sigdeliver)(rtcb); rtcb->xcp.sigdeliver = NULL; } diff --git a/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_unblocktask.c b/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_unblocktask.c index bf25a14a5..ba5f5987d 100644 --- a/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_unblocktask.c +++ b/nuttx/arch/sim/src/up_unblocktask.c @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ void up_unblock_task(_TCB *tcb) { _TCB *rtcb = (_TCB*)g_readytorun.head; - dbg("Unblocking TCB=%p\n", tcb); + sdbg("Unblocking TCB=%p\n", tcb); /* Remove the task from the blocked task list */ @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ void up_unblock_task(_TCB *tcb) */ rtcb = (_TCB*)g_readytorun.head; - dbg("New Active Task TCB=%p\n", rtcb); + sdbg("New Active Task TCB=%p\n", rtcb); /* The way that we handle signals in the simulation is kind of * a kludge. This would be unsafe in a truly multi-threaded, interrupt @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ void up_unblock_task(_TCB *tcb) if (rtcb->xcp.sigdeliver) { - dbg("Delivering signals TCB=%p\n", rtcb); + sdbg("Delivering signals TCB=%p\n", rtcb); ((sig_deliver_t)rtcb->xcp.sigdeliver)(rtcb); rtcb->xcp.sigdeliver = NULL; } |