diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | nuttx/TODO | 16 |
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/nuttx/TODO b/nuttx/TODO index 2f85472e2..b6d2cd00b 100644 --- a/nuttx/TODO +++ b/nuttx/TODO @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ NuttX TODO List (Last updated November 17, 2008) (1) Signals (sched/, arch/) (1) pthreads (sched/) (1) C++ Support - (12) Network (net/, netutils/) + (14) Network (net/, netutils/) (1) USB (drivers/usbdev) (4) Libraries (lib/) (6) File system/Generic drivers (fs/, drivers/) @@ -206,6 +206,20 @@ o Network (net/, netutils/) Status: Open Priority: Low + Description: TCP supports read-ahead buffering to handle the receipt of + TCP/IP packets when there is no read() in place. Should such + capability be useful for UDP? PRO: Would reduce packet loss + and enable support for poll()/select(). CON: UDP is inherently + lossy so why waste memory footprint? + Status: Open + Priority: Medium + + Description: poll()/select is not implement for UDP sockets because they do + do not support read-ahead buffering. Therefore, there is never + a case where you can read from a UDP socket without blocking. + Status: Open, depends on UDP read-ahead support + Priority: Medium + o USB (drivers/usbdev) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |