aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tests/disabled
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMartin Odersky <odersky@gmail.com>2016-02-04 18:06:03 +0100
committerMartin Odersky <odersky@gmail.com>2016-02-04 18:06:03 +0100
commitfc4867eafbf9714bfd053cc594b6763197859001 (patch)
treeb1af2d7453c84dd858ab77104f104528c884aa06 /tests/disabled
parent6778e3c74ff86c0174e84bb3df08af47931ecbbb (diff)
downloaddotty-fc4867eafbf9714bfd053cc594b6763197859001.tar.gz
dotty-fc4867eafbf9714bfd053cc594b6763197859001.tar.bz2
dotty-fc4867eafbf9714bfd053cc594b6763197859001.zip
Disable benchmark test
The test checks that Scala collections perform within 10x of Java collections. That's not something we need to test for dotty. And because of the heavily parallel execution of the tests it does not always hold. This is the second time in a a month that this particular test failed on jenkins. I think we lost enough cycles on it.
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/disabled')
-rw-r--r--tests/disabled/run/t5293-map.scala88
1 files changed, 88 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tests/disabled/run/t5293-map.scala b/tests/disabled/run/t5293-map.scala
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..1ef7d97e5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/disabled/run/t5293-map.scala
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+
+
+
+import scala.collection.JavaConverters._
+
+
+
+object Test extends dotty.runtime.LegacyApp {
+
+ def bench(label: String)(body: => Unit): Long = {
+ val start = System.nanoTime
+
+ 0.until(10).foreach(_ => body)
+
+ val end = System.nanoTime
+
+ //println("%s: %s ms".format(label, (end - start) / 1000.0 / 1000.0))
+
+ end - start
+ }
+
+ def benchJava(values: java.util.Map[Int, Int]) = {
+ bench("Java Map") {
+ val m = new java.util.HashMap[Int, Int]
+
+ m.putAll(values)
+ }
+ }
+
+ def benchScala(values: Iterable[(Int, Int)]) = {
+ bench("Scala Map") {
+ val m = new scala.collection.mutable.HashMap[Int, Int]
+
+ m ++= values
+ }
+ }
+
+ def benchScalaSorted(values: Iterable[(Int, Int)]) = {
+ bench("Scala Map sorted") {
+ val m = new scala.collection.mutable.HashMap[Int, Int]
+
+ m ++= values.toArray.sorted
+ }
+ }
+
+ def benchScalaPar(values: Iterable[(Int, Int)]) = {
+ bench("Scala ParMap") {
+ val m = new scala.collection.parallel.mutable.ParHashMap[Int, Int] map { x => x }
+
+ m ++= values
+ }
+ }
+
+ val total = 50000
+ val values = (0 until total) zip (0 until total)
+ val map = scala.collection.mutable.HashMap.empty[Int, Int]
+
+ map ++= values
+
+ // warmup
+ for (x <- 0 until 5) {
+ benchJava(map.asJava)
+ benchScala(map)
+ benchScalaPar(map)
+ benchJava(map.asJava)
+ benchScala(map)
+ benchScalaPar(map)
+ }
+
+ val javamap = benchJava(map.asJava)
+ val scalamap = benchScala(map)
+ val scalaparmap = benchScalaPar(map)
+
+ // println(javamap)
+ // println(scalamap)
+ // println(scalaparmap)
+
+ assert(scalamap < (javamap * 10), "scalamap: " + scalamap + " vs. javamap: " + javamap)
+ assert(scalaparmap < (javamap * 10), "scalaparmap: " + scalaparmap + " vs. javamap: " + javamap)
+}
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+