blob: 6c9f76344abe951d85e81437ac68500a2811af15 (
plain) (
blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
|
syntax = "proto3";
// These proto descriptors have at one time been reported as an issue or defect.
// They are kept here to replicate the issue, and continue to verify the fix.
// Issue: Non-"Google.Protobuffers" namespace will ensure that protobuffer library types are qualified
option csharp_namespace = "UnitTest.Issues.TestProtos";
package unittest_issues;
option optimize_for = SPEED;
// Issue 307: when generating doubly-nested types, any references
// should be of the form A.Types.B.Types.C.
message Issue307 {
message NestedOnce {
message NestedTwice {
}
}
}
// Old issue 13: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=13
// New issue 309: https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/309
// message A {
// optional int32 _A = 1;
// }
// message B {
// optional int32 B_ = 1;
// }
//message AB {
// optional int32 a_b = 1;
//}
// Similar issue with numeric names
// Java code failed too, so probably best for this to be a restriction.
// See https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/308
// message NumberField {
// optional int32 _01 = 1;
// }
// issue 19 - negative enum values
enum NegativeEnum {
NEGATIVE_ENUM_ZERO = 0;
FiveBelow = -5;
MinusOne = -1;
}
message NegativeEnumMessage {
NegativeEnum value = 1;
repeated NegativeEnum values = 2 [packed = false];
repeated NegativeEnum packed_values = 3 [packed=true];
}
// Issue 21: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=21
// Decorate fields with [deprecated=true] as [System.Obsolete]
message DeprecatedChild {
}
enum DeprecatedEnum {
DEPRECATED_ZERO = 0;
one = 1;
}
message DeprecatedFieldsMessage {
int32 PrimitiveValue = 1 [deprecated = true];
repeated int32 PrimitiveArray = 2 [deprecated = true];
DeprecatedChild MessageValue = 3 [deprecated = true];
repeated DeprecatedChild MessageArray = 4 [deprecated = true];
DeprecatedEnum EnumValue = 5 [deprecated = true];
repeated DeprecatedEnum EnumArray = 6 [deprecated = true];
}
// Issue 45: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=45
message ItemField {
int32 item = 1;
}
message ReservedNames {
// Force a nested type called Types
message SomeNestedType {
}
int32 types = 1;
int32 descriptor = 2;
}
message TestJsonFieldOrdering {
// These fields are deliberately not declared in numeric
// order, and the oneof fields aren't contiguous either.
// This allows for reasonably robust tests of JSON output
// ordering.
// TestFieldOrderings in unittest_proto3.proto is similar,
// but doesn't include oneofs.
// TODO: Consider adding oneofs to TestFieldOrderings, although
// that will require fixing other tests in multiple platforms.
// Alternatively, consider just adding this to
// unittest_proto3.proto if multiple platforms want it.
int32 plain_int32 = 4;
oneof o1 {
string o1_string = 2;
int32 o1_int32 = 5;
}
string plain_string = 1;
oneof o2 {
int32 o2_int32 = 6;
string o2_string = 3;
}
}
message TestJsonName {
// Message for testing the effects for of the json_name option
string name = 1;
string description = 2 [json_name = "desc"];
string guid = 3 [json_name = "exid"];
}
|
