summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/files/neg/macro-basic-mamdmi.check
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJason Zaugg <jzaugg@gmail.com>2013-10-08 22:28:00 +0200
committerJason Zaugg <jzaugg@gmail.com>2013-10-09 13:56:22 +0200
commit83feb8609161bf19247a8a310f8c5a9e3d8469f5 (patch)
tree82c3569de970c25e121554809134ffb388ce50ff /test/files/neg/macro-basic-mamdmi.check
parent7e4a97e532a9adcd0a6d014d948702aebec3541f (diff)
downloadscala-83feb8609161bf19247a8a310f8c5a9e3d8469f5.tar.gz
scala-83feb8609161bf19247a8a310f8c5a9e3d8469f5.tar.bz2
scala-83feb8609161bf19247a8a310f8c5a9e3d8469f5.zip
SI-7985 Typecheck args after failure to typecheck function
`missing1.foo(missing2)` now reports `missing1` and `missing2` as not found. Previously, only the first was reported. The arguments are typed with an expected type ErrorType. We propagate this through as the inferred type of anonymous function parameters to avoid issuing cascading "missing parameter type" errors in code like: scala> Nil.mapp(x => abracadabra) <console>:8: error: value mapp is not a member of object Nil Nil.mapp(x => abracadabra) ^ <console>:8: error: not found: value abracadabra Nil.mapp(x => abracadabra) ^ This was in response to unwanted changes in the output of existing neg tests; no new test is added. Similarly, we refine the errors in neg/t6436b.scala by to avoid cascaded errors after: type mismatch; found: StringContext, required: ?{def q: ?}
Diffstat (limited to 'test/files/neg/macro-basic-mamdmi.check')
-rw-r--r--test/files/neg/macro-basic-mamdmi.check4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/test/files/neg/macro-basic-mamdmi.check b/test/files/neg/macro-basic-mamdmi.check
index 621d318ceb..9328fbd51c 100644
--- a/test/files/neg/macro-basic-mamdmi.check
+++ b/test/files/neg/macro-basic-mamdmi.check
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-Impls_Macros_Test_1.scala:36: error: macro implementation not found: foo
+Impls_Macros_Test_1.scala:36: error: macro implementation not found: quux
(the most common reason for that is that you cannot use macro implementations in the same compilation run that defines them)
println(foo(2) + Macros.bar(2) * new Macros().quux(4))
- ^
+ ^
one error found