summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/files/neg/t2866.scala
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJason Zaugg <jzaugg@gmail.com>2014-11-09 18:29:35 +1000
committerJason Zaugg <jzaugg@gmail.com>2014-11-09 18:38:21 +1000
commit90a98f7c41cfcfdb60dc25db5ac33d0d0ff10f99 (patch)
tree0f948e0ee75d048164122d285c148910ab2eb033 /test/files/neg/t2866.scala
parentb431a4bd83d3bfb2b95d0426d2905b34ce1265ad (diff)
downloadscala-90a98f7c41cfcfdb60dc25db5ac33d0d0ff10f99.tar.gz
scala-90a98f7c41cfcfdb60dc25db5ac33d0d0ff10f99.tar.bz2
scala-90a98f7c41cfcfdb60dc25db5ac33d0d0ff10f99.zip
SI-5639 Fix spurious discarding of implicit import
In Scala fa0cdc7b (just before 2.9.0), a regression in implicit search, SI-2866, was discovered by Lift and fixed. The nature of the regression was that an in-scope, non-implicit symbol failed to shadow an eponymous implicit import. The fix for this introduced `isQualifyingImplicit` which discards in-scope implicits when the current `Context`'s scope contains a name-clashing entry. Incidentally, this proved to be a shallow solution, and we later improved shadowing detection in SI-4270 / 9129cfe9. That picked up cases where a locally defined symbol in an intervening scope shadowed an implicit. This commit includes the test case from the comments of SI-2866. Part of it is tested as a neg test (to test reporting of ambiguities), and the rest is tested in a run test (to test which implicits are picked.) However, in the test case of SI-5639, we see that the scope lookup performend by `isQualifyingImplicit` is fooled by a "ghost" module symbol. The apparition I'm referring to is entered when `initializeFromClassPath` / `enterClassAndModule` encounters a class file named 'Baz.class', and speculatively enters _both_ a class and module symbol. AFAIK, this is done to defer parsing the class file to determine what inside. If it happens to be a Java compiled class, the module symbol is needed to house the static members. This commit adds a condition that `Symbol#exists` which shines a torch (forces the info) in the direction of the ghost module symbol. In our test, this causes it to vanish, as we only need a class symbol for the Scala defined `class Baz`. The existing `pos` test for this actually did not exercise the bug, separate compilation is required. It was originally checked in to `pending` with this error, and then later moved to `pos` when someone noticed it was not failing.
Diffstat (limited to 'test/files/neg/t2866.scala')
-rw-r--r--test/files/neg/t2866.scala59
1 files changed, 59 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test/files/neg/t2866.scala b/test/files/neg/t2866.scala
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..55ebff9710
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/files/neg/t2866.scala
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+// for 2.7.x compatibility
+
+object A {
+ implicit val one = 1
+}
+
+object Test {
+
+ locally {
+ import A._
+ locally {
+ // assert(implicitly[Int] == 1) // error: could not find implicit value for parameter e: Int.
+ // !!! Why one A.one?
+ // (I assume you mean: why _not_ A.one? A.one is shadowed by local one.
+ // but the local one cannot be used yet because it does not have an explicit type.
+ implicit val one = 2
+ assert(implicitly[Int] == 2)
+ assert(one == 2)
+ }
+ }
+
+ locally {
+ import A._
+ implicit val one: Int = 2
+ assert(implicitly[Int] == 2)
+ assert(one == 2)
+ }
+
+ locally {
+ import A.one // warning: imported `one' is permanently hidden by definition of value one.
+ // !!! Really?
+ //assert(implicitly[Int] == 1)
+ implicit val one = 2
+ assert(implicitly[Int] == 2) // !!! why not 2?
+ assert(one == 2)
+ }
+
+ locally {
+ import A.one
+ assert(implicitly[Int] == 1)
+ implicit val two = 2
+ assert(implicitly[Int] == 2) // !!! Not ambiguous in 2.8.0. Ambigous in 2.7.6
+ }
+
+ locally {
+ import A._
+ assert(implicitly[Int] == 1)
+ implicit val two = 2
+ import A.{one => _}
+ assert(implicitly[Int] == 2) // !!! Not ambiguous in 2.8.0. Ambiguous in 2.7.6
+ }
+
+ locally {
+ import A.{one => _, _}
+ implicit val two = 2
+ assert(implicitly[Int] == 2) // not ambiguous in 2.8.0 nor im ambiguous in 2.7.6
+ }
+
+}