diff options
| author | Martin Odersky <odersky@gmail.com> | 2012-09-20 18:22:39 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Grzegorz Kossakowski <grzegorz.kossakowski@gmail.com> | 2012-10-03 13:44:16 +0200 |
| commit | ef934492df93e0fd3d78e7a3d4f9cccaf765d4d5 (patch) | |
| tree | e4cedab4789af1180a9be314d422d179f95e0c44 /test/files/neg/t5799.check | |
| parent | e9edc69684b3d55a0aef16325e358036c71f4c57 (diff) | |
| download | scala-ef934492df93e0fd3d78e7a3d4f9cccaf765d4d5.tar.gz scala-ef934492df93e0fd3d78e7a3d4f9cccaf765d4d5.tar.bz2 scala-ef934492df93e0fd3d78e7a3d4f9cccaf765d4d5.zip | |
Revised restrictions for value classes and unversal traits
and brought compiler in line with them. One thing we can accept IMO are nested
classes (nested objects are still a problem). In fact, it makes no sense to
exclude nested classes from value classes but not from universal traits. A class
nested in universal trait will becomes a class nested in a value class by
inheritance. Note that the reflection library already contains a universal trait
with a nested class (IndexedSeqLike), so we should accept them if we can.
Diffstat (limited to 'test/files/neg/t5799.check')
| -rw-r--r-- | test/files/neg/t5799.check | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/test/files/neg/t5799.check b/test/files/neg/t5799.check index 10e2658d56..3b43d06a94 100644 --- a/test/files/neg/t5799.check +++ b/test/files/neg/t5799.check @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -t5799.scala:2: error: value class may not have secondary constructors +t5799.scala:2: error: secondary constructor is not allowed in value class def this(s: String) = this(s.toDouble) ^ one error found |