summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/files/neg/unchecked-impossible.scala
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPaul Phillips <paulp@improving.org>2012-09-27 06:41:17 -0700
committerPaul Phillips <paulp@improving.org>2012-09-27 09:24:04 -0700
commit96d4a8646b1962fac2f2fc443b56c6619221b43c (patch)
treebd39f411275452bb5db2335da966ac8042cd504f /test/files/neg/unchecked-impossible.scala
parent17b409b7832f541e3d52d2776c8ff3c47574ae0f (diff)
downloadscala-96d4a8646b1962fac2f2fc443b56c6619221b43c.tar.gz
scala-96d4a8646b1962fac2f2fc443b56c6619221b43c.tar.bz2
scala-96d4a8646b1962fac2f2fc443b56c6619221b43c.zip
Nailed down the "impossible match" logic.
I will again defer to a comment. /** Given classes A and B, can it be shown that nothing which is * an A will ever be a subclass of something which is a B? This * entails not only showing that !(A isSubClass B) but that the * same is true of all their subclasses. Restated for symmetry: * the same value cannot be a member of both A and B. * * 1) A must not be a subclass of B, nor B of A (the trivial check) * 2) One of A or B must be completely knowable (see isKnowable) * 3) Assuming A is knowable, the proposition is true if * !(A' isSubClass B) for all A', where A' is a subclass of A. * * Due to symmetry, the last condition applies as well in reverse. */
Diffstat (limited to 'test/files/neg/unchecked-impossible.scala')
-rw-r--r--test/files/neg/unchecked-impossible.scala16
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test/files/neg/unchecked-impossible.scala b/test/files/neg/unchecked-impossible.scala
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..985a2d0b08
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/files/neg/unchecked-impossible.scala
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+final case class T2[+A, +B](a: A, b: B)
+
+class A {
+ def f1 = T2(1, 2) match {
+ case Seq(x) =>
+ case _ =>
+ }
+ def f2 = T2(1, 2) match {
+ case _: T2[Int, Int] => /* nowarn */
+ case _ =>
+ }
+ def f3 = T2(1, 2) match {
+ case _: T2[_, Int] => /* nowarn */
+ case _ =>
+ }
+}