summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/files/neg/unchecked2.check
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPaul Phillips <paulp@improving.org>2012-09-27 06:41:17 -0700
committerPaul Phillips <paulp@improving.org>2012-09-27 09:24:04 -0700
commit96d4a8646b1962fac2f2fc443b56c6619221b43c (patch)
treebd39f411275452bb5db2335da966ac8042cd504f /test/files/neg/unchecked2.check
parent17b409b7832f541e3d52d2776c8ff3c47574ae0f (diff)
downloadscala-96d4a8646b1962fac2f2fc443b56c6619221b43c.tar.gz
scala-96d4a8646b1962fac2f2fc443b56c6619221b43c.tar.bz2
scala-96d4a8646b1962fac2f2fc443b56c6619221b43c.zip
Nailed down the "impossible match" logic.
I will again defer to a comment. /** Given classes A and B, can it be shown that nothing which is * an A will ever be a subclass of something which is a B? This * entails not only showing that !(A isSubClass B) but that the * same is true of all their subclasses. Restated for symmetry: * the same value cannot be a member of both A and B. * * 1) A must not be a subclass of B, nor B of A (the trivial check) * 2) One of A or B must be completely knowable (see isKnowable) * 3) Assuming A is knowable, the proposition is true if * !(A' isSubClass B) for all A', where A' is a subclass of A. * * Due to symmetry, the last condition applies as well in reverse. */
Diffstat (limited to 'test/files/neg/unchecked2.check')
-rw-r--r--test/files/neg/unchecked2.check12
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/test/files/neg/unchecked2.check b/test/files/neg/unchecked2.check
index b4a14358c7..68fdfa82ac 100644
--- a/test/files/neg/unchecked2.check
+++ b/test/files/neg/unchecked2.check
@@ -1,22 +1,22 @@
-unchecked2.scala:4: error: fruitless type test: a Some[List[Int]] can never be a Option[List[String]] (but still might match its erasure)
+unchecked2.scala:4: error: fruitless type test: a value of type Some[List[Int]] cannot also be a Option[List[String]] (but still might match its erasure)
/* warn */ Some(List(1)).isInstanceOf[Option[List[String]]]
^
unchecked2.scala:5: error: non-variable type argument Option[_] in type Option[Option[_]] is unchecked since it is eliminated by erasure
/* warn */ Some(123).isInstanceOf[Option[Option[_]]]
^
-unchecked2.scala:6: error: fruitless type test: a Some[Int] can never be a Option[String] (but still might match its erasure)
+unchecked2.scala:6: error: fruitless type test: a value of type Some[Int] cannot also be a Option[String] (but still might match its erasure)
/* warn */ Some(123).isInstanceOf[Option[String]]
^
-unchecked2.scala:7: error: fruitless type test: a Some[Int] can never be a Option[List[String]] (but still might match its erasure)
+unchecked2.scala:7: error: fruitless type test: a value of type Some[Int] cannot also be a Option[List[String]] (but still might match its erasure)
/* warn */ Some(123).isInstanceOf[Option[List[String]]]
^
-unchecked2.scala:8: error: fruitless type test: a Some[Int] can never be a Option[List[Int => String]] (but still might match its erasure)
+unchecked2.scala:8: error: fruitless type test: a value of type Some[Int] cannot also be a Option[List[Int => String]] (but still might match its erasure)
/* warn */ Some(123).isInstanceOf[Option[List[Int => String]]]
^
-unchecked2.scala:9: error: fruitless type test: a Some[Int] can never be a Option[(String, Double)] (but still might match its erasure)
+unchecked2.scala:9: error: fruitless type test: a value of type Some[Int] cannot also be a Option[(String, Double)] (but still might match its erasure)
/* warn */ Some(123).isInstanceOf[Option[(String, Double)]]
^
-unchecked2.scala:10: error: fruitless type test: a Some[Int] can never be a Option[String => Double] (but still might match its erasure)
+unchecked2.scala:10: error: fruitless type test: a value of type Some[Int] cannot also be a Option[String => Double] (but still might match its erasure)
/* warn */ Some(123).isInstanceOf[Option[String => Double]]
^
unchecked2.scala:14: error: non-variable type argument List[String] in type Option[List[String]] is unchecked since it is eliminated by erasure