summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/files/run/reflection-scala-annotations.check
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEugene Burmako <xeno.by@gmail.com>2014-01-28 19:37:59 +0300
committerEugene Burmako <xeno.by@gmail.com>2014-02-14 14:19:44 +0100
commit0268e03cb461b0c7e8ae2082894988395fc0994a (patch)
tree7dec4c177aad62a2209601a0f5327e243c3340b2 /test/files/run/reflection-scala-annotations.check
parentc7fd03900b7023967f22932f1f32b98d57983e9b (diff)
downloadscala-0268e03cb461b0c7e8ae2082894988395fc0994a.tar.gz
scala-0268e03cb461b0c7e8ae2082894988395fc0994a.tar.bz2
scala-0268e03cb461b0c7e8ae2082894988395fc0994a.zip
SI-8118 simplifies Annotation down to a plain Tree
As per https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/scala-internals/8v2UL-LR9yY, annotations don’t have to be represented as AnnotationInfos and can be reduced to plain Trees. Due to compatibility reasons and because of the limitations of the cake pattern used in implementing current version of Reflection, we can’t just say `type Annotation = Tree`, however what we can definitely do is to deprecate all the methods on Annotation and expose `tree: Tree` instead.
Diffstat (limited to 'test/files/run/reflection-scala-annotations.check')
-rw-r--r--test/files/run/reflection-scala-annotations.check7
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test/files/run/reflection-scala-annotations.check b/test/files/run/reflection-scala-annotations.check
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..5bc2786161
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/files/run/reflection-scala-annotations.check
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+reflection-scala-annotations.scala:5: warning: Implementation restriction: subclassing Classfile does not
+make your annotation visible at runtime. If that is what
+you want, you must write the annotation class in Java.
+class jann(x: Int, y: Array[Int]) extends ClassfileAnnotation
+ ^
+new sann(1, immutable.this.List.apply[Int](1, 2))
+new jann(y = Array(1, 2), x = 2)