diff options
| author | George Leontiev <folone@gmail.com> | 2013-07-30 11:06:26 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | George Leontiev <folone@gmail.com> | 2013-08-08 20:38:24 +0200 |
| commit | b741e8ada8d8ba716af791868ba1222cd74255e4 (patch) | |
| tree | 06c6af67ecf12a97e730bf926398744f947af9f4 /test/files/scalacheck/ReflectionExtractors.scala | |
| parent | b145cb1c5d98cf7b01a145fa38c3e412e59f81b6 (diff) | |
| download | scala-b741e8ada8d8ba716af791868ba1222cd74255e4.tar.gz scala-b741e8ada8d8ba716af791868ba1222cd74255e4.tar.bz2 scala-b741e8ada8d8ba716af791868ba1222cd74255e4.zip | |
Make map2Conserve occupy constant stack space in spirit of SI-2411
I recently discovered a StackOverflowError, caused by this function:
https://gist.github.com/folone/7b2f2e2a16314ab28109
The circumstances are pretty extreme, still having a tail-recursive
function seems to be a good idea.
The function behaves the same way old function did (supported by tests),
which is not really how map2 behaves. I did not change this behavior to
not introduce any regression. I actually tried to make it behave like map2,
and it does introduce regression.
Diffstat (limited to 'test/files/scalacheck/ReflectionExtractors.scala')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions