summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Gemfile
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Update spec build to Jekyll 3.3Aaron S. Hawley2016-12-111-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Seth Tisue suggested updating the Jekyll dependency for the Scala spec in scala/scala-lang#559 so that is consistent with the scala-lang.org and docs.scala-lang.org Web sites. Upgrading Jekll from 2.5.3 to 3.3.0 produces slight differences in the HTML output. The differences in the HTML are isolated to the markup for source code highlighting. In the spec, those are Scala code listings and the blocks of extended-BNF. From what I saw looking at all the pages, they render exactly the same, pixel-for-pixel, as before. I hit print preview and also didn't notice any anomalies. I tested in Ruby 2.2.5 using rbenv 0.4.0, gem 2.4.5.1 and Bundler 1.13.6. This is compared to the Travis build that uses Ruby 2.2.0p0 using rvm 1.26.10, gem 2.4.5 and Bundler 1.7.9.
* use newer Redcarpet to build specSeth Tisue2015-07-151-1/+1
| | | | | now that https://github.com/vmg/redcarpet/issues/494 is fixed we don't need to stay pinned to an outdated version anymore
* Pin to non-crashy redcarpetAdriaan Moors2015-06-191-1/+1
|
* Upgrade Ruby / Jekyll versions used to build the specJason Zaugg2015-04-091-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | I've given this a dry-run in a separate repository: https://travis-ci.org/retronym/scala-spec/builds/57744110 Right now, we are getting an error during `bundle install`: https://travis-ci.org/scala/scala/builds/57737768 I haven't verified that the output is the same, though.
* Jekyll generated html in spec/ directoryAdriaan Moors2014-03-271-0/+7
To avoid confusion, removing artifacts for currently unsupported targets (pdf/single-page html). I'd like to bring those back, but in the mean time let's avoid distractions. Add Travis build.