|
|
Don't emit a synthetic `apply` (or `unapply`) when it would
clash with an existing one. This allows e.g., a `private apply`,
along with a `case class` with a `private` constructor.
We have to retract the synthetic method in a pretty roundabout way,
as we need the other methods and the owner to be completed already.
Unless we have to complete the synthetic `apply` while completing
the user-defined one, this should not be a problem. If this does
happen, this implies there's a cycle in computing the user-defined
signature and the synthetic one, which is not allowed.
|
