| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With GenBCode being the default and only supported backend for Java 8,
we can get rid of GenASM.
This commit also fixes/migrates/moves to pending/deletes tests which
depended on GenASM before.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Switch the defaults of `-Ydelambdafy` and `-Ybackend`.
Rewrite t6288b-jump-position test - no more icode
Don't crash GenBCode beyond JVM code size limits
A similar patch is in GenASM, see 3fa2c97
Fix check files for GenBCode / delambdafy:method defaults
Force copy propagation test to ASM, see SI-9364
Force inline-ex-handlers test to GenASM, see SI-9364
Move t6613 test to pending - still broken in GenBCode
Adding a `flags` file with `-Ybackend:GenASM` doesn't seem to have
the desired effect.
SI-6613 is re-opened.
Force a few tests to GenASM, see SI-9364
|
|
|
The Delambdafy phase generates its `FunctionN` subclasses after
the specialization phase. As such, `((x: Int) => x).apply(42)` incurs
boxing.
This commit falls back to the `-Ydelambdafy:inline` in this case.
This is done by running the specialization type map over the
type of the function, and seeing if anything changes. To make this
work robustly, we first need to ensure that the specialization info
transformer has processed all the function types.
This is not a fundamental limitation; we could in principle generate
the specialized code.
A followup change will use `-Ydelambdafy:method` as the basis for
invokedymnamic lambdas. As part of that stream of
work, we will synthesize specialization-aware lambdas, and remove
the fallback to `-Ydelambdafy:inline`.
I have updated some tests that intend to test the delambdafy transform
to avoid use of specialized function types.
|
