| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Move run/t8960 to pending
It tests the serialVersionUID field on closure classes. The field
doesn't exist for indyLambda closures.
See https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-9373
Move some reify tests to pending
They fail at runtime in GenBCode since scala is built with indyLambda
enabled:
java.lang.AssertionError: assertion failed: Bad superClass for trait JFunction1: class Any
at scala.tools.nsc.Global.assert(Global.scala:261)
at scala.tools.nsc.backend.jvm.BTypesFromSymbols.setClassInfo(BTypesFromSymbols.scala:228)
Noted in https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-9374
force t6546 to GenASM - no closure elimination in GenBCode yet
Noted in https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-9364.
Fix or disable some tests that fail because of the old optimizer
The old inliner fails more often when the library is built with
indylambda.
Noted in https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-9374.
Example: List.foreach
➜ sandbox git:(jfun) ✗ qs -Ybackend:GenASM -optimize -Yinline-warnings
Welcome to Scala version 2.12.0-20150630-220939-1cb032d806 (Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM, Java 1.8.0_45).
Type in expressions to have them evaluated.
Type :help for more information.
scala> List(1,2,3).foreach(x => x + 1)
<console>:11: warning: Could not inline required method foreach because bytecode unavailable.
List(1,2,3).foreach(x => x + 1)
^
<console>:11: warning: At the end of the day, could not inline @inline-marked method foreach
List(1,2,3).foreach(x => x + 1)
^
Upate a number of tests for having indyLambda enabled
The delambdafyLambdaClassNames tests was removed, there's nothing to
tests with indyLambda.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Switch the defaults of `-Ydelambdafy` and `-Ybackend`.
Rewrite t6288b-jump-position test - no more icode
Don't crash GenBCode beyond JVM code size limits
A similar patch is in GenASM, see 3fa2c97
Fix check files for GenBCode / delambdafy:method defaults
Force copy propagation test to ASM, see SI-9364
Force inline-ex-handlers test to GenASM, see SI-9364
Move t6613 test to pending - still broken in GenBCode
Adding a `flags` file with `-Ybackend:GenASM` doesn't seem to have
the desired effect.
SI-6613 is re-opened.
Force a few tests to GenASM, see SI-9364
|
| |
|
|
| |
Should have been done in 63207e1.
|
|
|
Post-erasure of value classs in method signatures to the underlying
type wreaks havoc when the erased signature overlaps with the
generic signature from an overriden method. There just isn't room
for both. But we *really* need both; callers to the interface method
will be passing boxed values that the bridge needs to unbox and
pass to the specific method that accepts unboxed values.
This most commonly turns up with value classes that erase to
Object that are used as the parameter or the return type of
an anonymous function.
This was thought to have been intractable, unless we chose
a different name for the unboxed, specific method in the
subclass. But that sounds like a big task that would require
call-site rewriting, ala specialization.
But there is an important special case in which we don't need
to rewrite call sites. If the class defining the method is
anonymous, there is actually no need for the unboxed method;
it will *only* ever be called via the generic method.
I came to this realisation when looking at how Java 8 lambdas
are handled. I was expecting bridge methods, but found none.
The lambda body is placed directly in a method exactly matching
the generic signature.
This commit detects the clash between bridge and target,
and recovers for anonymous classes by mangling the name
of the target method's symbol. This is used as the bytecode
name. The generic bridge forward to that, as before, with
the requisite box/unbox operations.
|
