summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/files
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Fields phase expands lazy vals like modulesAdriaan Moors2016-08-2926-110/+110
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | They remain ValDefs until then. - remove lazy accessor logic now that we have a single ValDef for lazy vals, with the underlying machinery being hidden until the fields phase leave a `@deprecated def lazyAccessor` for scala-refactoring - don't skolemize in purely synthetic getters, but *do* skolemize in lazy accessor during typers Lazy accessors have arbitrary user code, so have to skolemize. We exempt the purely synthetic accessors (`isSyntheticAccessor`) for strict vals, and lazy accessors emitted by the fields phase to avoid spurious type mismatches due to issues with existentials (That bug is tracked as https://github.com/scala/scala-dev/issues/165) When we're past typer, lazy accessors are synthetic, but before they are user-defined to make this hack less hacky, we could rework our flag usage to allow for requiring both the ACCESSOR and the SYNTHETIC bits to identify synthetic accessors and trigger the exemption. see also https://github.com/scala/scala-dev/issues/165 ok 7 - pos/existentials-harmful.scala ok 8 - pos/t2435.scala ok 9 - pos/existentials.scala previous attempt: skolemize type of val inside the private[this] val because its type is only observed from inside the accessor methods (inside the method scope its existentials are skolemized) - bean accessors have regular method types, not nullary method types - must re-infer type for param accessor some weirdness with scoping of param accessor vals and defs? - tailcalls detect lazy vals, which are defdefs after fields - can inline constant lazy val from trait - don't mix in fields etc for an overridden lazy val - need try-lift in lazy vals: the assign is not seen in uncurry because fields does the transform (see run/t2333.scala) - ensure field members end up final in bytecode - implicit class companion method: annot filter in completer - update check: previous error message was tangled up with unrelated field definitions (`var s` and `val s_scope`), now it behaves consistently whether those are val/vars or defs - analyzer plugin check update seems benign, but no way to know... - error message gen: there is no underlying symbol for a deferred var look for missing getter/setter instead - avoid retypechecking valdefs while duplicating for specialize see pos/spec-private - Scaladoc uniformly looks to field/accessor symbol - test updates to innerClassAttribute by Lukas
* Merge pull request #5263 from retronym/review/5041Jason Zaugg2016-08-2910-7/+147
|\ | | | | SI-5294 SI-6161 Hard graft in asSeenFrom, refinements, and existentials [ci: last-only]
| * Address review commentsJason Zaugg2016-08-232-7/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - clarify the intent of tests - Consolidate stripExistentialsAndTypeVars with similar logic in mergePrefixAndArgs - Refactor special cases in maybeRewrap The name isn't great, but I'm struggling to come up with a pithy way to describe the rogue band of types.
| * SI-5294 Use bounds of abstract prefix in asSeenFromJason Zaugg2016-08-234-0/+110
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ASF was failing to recognize the correspondence between a prefix if it has an abstract type symbol, even if it is bounded by the currently considered class. Distilling the test cases, this led to incorrect typechecking of the RHS of `G` in: ``` trait T { type A trait HasH { type H[U] <: U } type F[N <: HasH] = N#H[T] type G[N <: HasH] = F[N]#A // RHS was incorrectly reduced to T.this.A } ``` In the fuller examples (included as test cases), this meant that type level functions written as members of `HList` could not be implemented in terms of each other, e.g. defining `Apply[N]` as `Drop[N]#Head` had the wrong semantics. This commit checks checks if the prefix has the candidate class as a base type, rather than checking if its type symbol has this as a base class. The latter formulation discarded information about the instantation of the abstract type. Using the example above: ``` scala> val F = typeOf[T].member(TypeName("F")).info F: $r.intp.global.Type = [N <: T.this.HasH]N#H[T] scala> F.resultType.typeSymbol.baseClasses // old approach res14: List[$r.intp.global.Symbol] = List(class Any) scala> F.resultType.baseClasses // new approach res13: List[$r.intp.global.Symbol] = List(trait T, class Object, class Any) ``` It is worth noting that dotty rejects some of these programs, as it introduces the rule that: > // A type T is a legal prefix in a type selection T#A if > // T is stable or T contains no abstract types except possibly A. > final def isLegalPrefixFor(selector: Name)(implicit ctx: Context) However, typechecking the program above in this comment in dotty yields: <trait> trait T() extends Object { type A <trait> trait HasH() extends Object { type H <: [HK$0] => <: HK$0 } type F = [HK$0] => HK$0#H{HK$0 = T}#Apply type G = [HK$0] => HK$0#H{HK$0 = T}#Apply#A } As the equivalent code [1] in dotc's `asSeenFrom` already looks for a base type of the prefix, rather than looking for a superclass of the prefix's type symbol. [1] https://github.com/lampepfl/dotty/blob/d2c96d02fccef3a82b88ee1ff31253b6ef17f900/src/dotty/tools/dotc/core/TypeOps.scala#L62
| * Improved refinement type and existential type handlingJason Zaugg2016-08-233-0/+24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Lazy base type seq elements are encoded as a refined type with an empty scope and a list of type refs over some common type symbol that will be merged when `BaseTypeSeq#apply` is called. The first change in this commit is to mark the creation and consumption of such elements with calls to `[is]IntersectionTypeForBaseTypeSeq`. They are distinguished by using the actual type symbol rather than a refinement class symbol, which in turn simplifies the code in `BaseTypeSeq#typeSymbol`. I have also made `lub` aware of this encoding: it is now able to "see through" to the parents of such refined types and merge them with other base types of the same class symbol (even other refined types representing lazy BTS elements.) To make this fix work, I also had to fix a bug in LUBs of multiple with existential types. Because of the way the recursion was structured in `mergePrefixAndArgs`, the order of list of types being merged changed behaviour: quantified varialbles of existential types were being rewrapped around the resultting type, but only if we hadn't encountered the first regular `TypeRef`. This can be seen with the following before/after shot: ``` // 2.11.8 scala> val ts = typeOf[Set[Any]] :: typeOf[Set[X] forSome { type X <: Y; type Y <: Int}] :: Nil; def merge(ts: List[Type]) = mergePrefixAndArgs(ts, Variance.Contravariant, lubDepth(ts)); val merged1 = merge(ts); val merged2 = merge(ts.reverse); (ts.forall(_ <:< merged1), ts.forall(_ <:< merged2)) ts: List[$r.intp.global.Type] = List(Set[Any], Set[_ <: Int]) merge: (ts: List[$r.intp.global.Type])$r.intp.global.Type merged1: $r.intp.global.Type = scala.collection.immutable.Set[_ >: Int] merged2: $r.intp.global.Type = scala.collection.immutable.Set[_53] forSome { type X <: Int; type _53 >: X } res0: (Boolean, Boolean) = (false,true) // HEAD ... merged1: $r.intp.global.Type = scala.collection.immutable.Set[_10] forSome { type X <: Int; type _10 >: X } merged2: $r.intp.global.Type = scala.collection.immutable.Set[_11] forSome { type X <: Int; type _11 >: X } res0: (Boolean, Boolean) = (true,true) ``` Furthermore, I have fixed the computation of the base type sequences of existential types over refinement types, in order to maintain the invariant that each slot of the base type sequence of a existential has the same type symbol as that of its underlying type. Before, what I've now called a `RefinementTypeRef` was transformed into a `RefinedType` during rewrapping in the existential, which led to it being wrongly considered as a lazy element of the base type sequence. The first change above should also be sufficient to avoid the bug, but I felt it was worth cleaning up `maybeRewrap` as an extra line of defence. Finally, I have added another special case to `BaseTypeSeq#apply` to be able to lazily compute elements that have been wrapped in an existential. The unit test cases in `TypesTest` rely on these changes. A subsequent commit will build on this foundation to make a fix to `asSeenFrom`.
| * Type#contains should peer into RefinementTypeRef-sJason Zaugg2016-08-191-0/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Usually, `contains` should not look into class symbol infos. For instance, we expect that: ``` scala> trait C { def foo: Int }; typeOf[C].contains(IntClass) defined trait C res1: Boolean = false ``` We do, however, look at the decls of a `RefinedType` in contains: ``` scala> typeOf[{ def foo: Int }].contains(IntClass) res2: Boolean = true ``` Things get a little vague, however, when we consider a type ref to the refinement class symbol of a refined type. ``` scala> TypeRef(NoPrefix, typeOf[{ def foo: Int }].typeSymbol, Nil) res3: $r.intp.global.Type = AnyRef{def foo: Int} scala> .contains(IntClass) res4: Boolean = false ``` These show up in the first element of the base type seq of a refined type, e.g: ``` scala> typeOf[{ def foo: Int }].typeSymbol.tpe_* res5: $r.intp.global.Type = AnyRef{def foo: Int} scala> typeOf[{ def foo: Int }].baseTypeSeq(0).getClass res7: Class[_ <: $r.intp.global.Type] = class scala.reflect.internal.Types$RefinementTypeRef scala> typeOf[{ def foo: Int }].typeSymbol.tpe_*.getClass res6: Class[_ <: $r.intp.global.Type] = class scala.reflect.internal.Types$RefinementTypeRef ``` This commit takes the opinion that a `RefinementTypeRef` should be transparent with respect to `contains`. This paves the way for fixing the base type sequences of existential types over refinement types. The implementation of `ContainsCollector` was already calling `normalize`, which goes from `RefinementTypeRef` to `RefinedType`. This commit maps over the result, which looks in the parents and decls.
| * Determistically enter classes from directory into package scopeJason Zaugg2016-08-192-7/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | On Linux, the directory listing is not automatically sorted on Mac. This leads to non-determistic ids of Symbols of the classes in a directory, which in turn leads to instability of the ordering of parents within inferred refinement types. Notable, with this patch, we will stably infer: ``` scala> case class C(); case class D(); List(C(), D()).head defined class C defined class D res0: Product with Serializable = C() ``` rather than sometimes getting `Serializable with Product` on Linux. As such, I've removed the workarounds for this instability in two test cases.
* | Merge pull request #5357 from SethTisue/topic/sd-206Seth Tisue2016-08-271-0/+4
|\ \ | | | | | | SAM for subtypes of FunctionN
| * | SAM for subtypes of FunctionNLukas Rytz2016-08-261-0/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | only exclude FunctionN types themselves from SAM, don't exclude their subtypes; we want e.g. trait T extends Function1[String, String] (x => x) : T to compile reference: https://github.com/scala/scala-dev/issues/206
* | | Merge pull request #5349 from som-snytt/issue/9841-testAdriaan Moors2016-08-241-0/+12
|\ \ \ | |/ / |/| | SI-9841 Progression test for SO on init
| * | SI-9841 Progression test for SO on initSom Snytt2016-08-171-0/+12
| |/ | | | | | | Test as reported in ticket. Works on 2.12.
* | Merge pull request #5322 from retronym/topic/SD-194Adriaan Moors2016-08-221-10/+10
|\ \ | |/ |/| SD-194 Tweak module initialization to comply with JVM spec
| * SD-194 Tweak module initialization to comply with JVM specJason Zaugg2016-08-181-10/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Top level modules in Scala currently desugar as: ``` class C; object O extends C { toString } ``` ``` public final class O$ extends C { public static final O$ MODULE$; public static {}; Code: 0: new #2 // class O$ 3: invokespecial #12 // Method "<init>":()V 6: return private O$(); Code: 0: aload_0 1: invokespecial #13 // Method C."<init>":()V 4: aload_0 5: putstatic #15 // Field MODULE$:LO$; 8: aload_0 9: invokevirtual #21 // Method java/lang/Object.toString:()Ljava/lang/String; 12: pop 13: return } ``` The static initalizer `<clinit>` calls the constructor `<init>`, which invokes superclass constructor, assigns `MODULE$= this`, and then runs the remainder of the object's constructor (`toString` in the example above.) It turns out that this relies on a bug in the JVM's verifier: assignment to a static final must occur lexically within the <clinit>, not from within `<init>` (even if the latter is happens to be called by the former). I'd like to move the assignment to <clinit> but that would change behaviour of "benign" cyclic references between modules. Example: ``` package p1; class CC { def foo = O.bar}; object O {new CC().foo; def bar = println(1)}; // Exiting paste mode, now interpreting. scala> p1.O 1 ``` This relies on the way that we assign MODULE$ field after the super class constructors are finished, but before the rest of the module constructor is called. Instead, this commit removes the ACC_FINAL bit from the field. It actually wasn't behaving as final at all, precisely the issue that the stricter verifier now alerts us to. ``` scala> :paste -raw // Entering paste mode (ctrl-D to finish) package p1; object O // Exiting paste mode, now interpreting. scala> val O1 = p1.O O1: p1.O.type = p1.O$@ee7d9f1 scala> scala.reflect.ensureAccessible(p1.O.getClass.getDeclaredConstructor()).newInstance() res0: p1.O.type = p1.O$@64cee07 scala> O1 eq p1.O res1: Boolean = false ``` We will still achieve safe publication of the assignment to other threads by virtue of the fact that `<clinit>` is executed within the scope of an initlization lock, as specified by: https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jvms/se8/html/jvms-5.html#jvms-5.5 Fixes scala/scala-dev#SD-194
* | Merge pull request #5266 from som-snytt/issue/9847Adriaan Moors2016-08-1434-87/+174
|\ \ | |/ |/| SI-9847 Nuance pure expr statement warning
| * SI-9847 Nuance pure expr statement warningSom Snytt2016-07-0834-87/+174
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Clarify the current warning, which means that an expression split over multiple lines may not be parsed as naively expected. When typing a block, attempt minor nuance. For instance, a single expression is not in need of parens. Try to avoid duplicate warnings for expressions that were adapted away from result position.
* | Merge pull request #5307 from adriaanm/issue-157Adriaan Moors2016-08-134-14/+70
|\ \ | | | | | | Propagate overloaded function type to expected arg type
| * | Propagate overloaded function type to expected arg typeAdriaan Moors2016-08-124-14/+70
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Infer missing parameter types for function literals passed to higher-order overloaded methods by deriving the expected argument type from the function types in the overloaded method type's argument types. This eases the pain caused by methods becoming overloaded because SAM types and function types are compatible, which used to disable parameter type inference because for overload resolution arguments are typed without expected type, while typedFunction needs the expected type to infer missing parameter types for function literals. It also aligns us with dotty. The special case for function literals seems reasonable, as it has precedent, and it just enables the special case in typing function literals (derive the param types from the expected type). Since this does change type inference, you can opt out using the Scala 2.11 source level. Fix scala/scala-dev#157
* | | Merge pull request #5332 from retronym/review/5304Adriaan Moors2016-08-132-0/+18
|\ \ \ | | | | | | | | Fixes to Java source support in Scaladoc
| * | | Javadoc: java static name resolutionAdriaan Moors2016-08-132-0/+18
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | [Jakob Odersky <jodersky@gmail.com>: remove obsolete comments and fix tests]
* | | | SD-128 fix override checks for default methodsLukas Rytz2016-08-123-0/+39
|/ / / | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The check for inheriting two conflicting members was wrong for default methods, leading to a missing error message. We were also not issuing "needs `override' modifier" when overriding a default method. Removes two methods: - `isDeferredOrJavaDefault` had a single use that is removed in this commit. - `isDeferredNotJavaDefault` is redundant with `isDeferred`, because no default method has the `DEFERRED` flag: - For symbols originating in the classfile parser this was the case from day one: default methods don't receive the `DEFERRED` flag. Only abstract interface methods do, as they have the `JAVA_ACC_ABSTRACT` flag in bytecode, which the classfile parser translates to `DEFERRED`. - For symbols created by the Java source parser, we don't add the `DEFERRED` to default methods anymore since 373db1e. Fixes scala/scala-dev#128
* | | Merge pull request #5321 from retronym/topic/lock-down-deserializeAdriaan Moors2016-08-122-28/+90
|\ \ \ | |/ / |/| | SD-193 Lock down lambda deserialization
| * | SD-193 Lock down lambda deserializationJason Zaugg2016-08-082-28/+90
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The old design allowed a forged `SerializedLambda` to be deserialized into a lambda that could call any private method in the host class. This commit passes through the list of all lambda impl methods to the bootstrap method and verifies that you are deserializing one of these. The new test case shows that a forged lambda can no longer call the private method, and that the new encoding is okay with a large number of lambdas in a file. We already have method handle constants in the constant pool to support the invokedynamic through LambdaMetafactory, so the only additional cost will be referring to these in the boostrap args for `LambdaDeserialize`, 2 bytes per lambda. I checked this with an example: https://gist.github.com/retronym/e343d211f7536d06f1fef4b499a0a177 Fixes SD-193
* | | Merge pull request #5258 from szeiger/issue/9019Stefan Zeiger2016-08-121-7/+7
|\ \ \ | | | | | | | | SI-9019 TraversableLike stringPrefix broken for inner classes
| * | | SI-9019 TraversableLike stringPrefix broken for inner classesRex Kerr2016-08-121-7/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This version preserves outer class and object names but discards any part of the name after a `$` that does not start with an upper-case letter. When an integer literal occurs after a `$`, the prefix up to that point is dropped so that classes defined within methods appear as top-level.
* | | | Merge pull request #5252 from adriaanm/t8339Stefan Zeiger2016-08-123-41/+2
|\ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | SI-8339 remove deprecated rewrite of withFilter -> filter
| * | | | SI-8339 drop deprecated fallback `withFilter` -> `filter`Adriaan Moors2016-08-113-41/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | You must implement the `withFilter` method to use `if`-guards in a `for`-comprehension. (Drop pos/t7239.scala because it relied on this rewrite.)
* | | | | Merge pull request #5141 from adriaanm/fieldsAdriaan Moors2016-08-1187-386/+1042
|\ \ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | Introducing: the fields phase [ci: last-only]
| * | | | | Drive accessor synthesis from info transformerAdriaan Moors2016-08-114-96/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Derive/filter/propagate annotations in info transformer, don't rely on having type checked the derived trees in order to see the annotations. Use synthetics mechanism for bean accessors -- the others will soon follow. Propagate inferred tpt from valdef to accessors by setting type in right spot of synthetic tree during the info completer. No need to add trees in derivedTrees, and get rid of some overfactoring in method synthesis, now that we have joined symbol and tree creation. Preserve symbol order because tests are sensitive to it. Drop warning on potentially discarded annotations, I don't think this warrants a warning. Motivated by breaking the scala-js compiler, which relied on annotations appearing when trees are type checked. Now that ordering constraint is gone in the new encoding, we may as well finally fix annotation assignment.
| * | | | | Admit @volatile on accessor in traitAdriaan Moors2016-08-111-0/+13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | There's no other place to squirrel away the annotation until we create a field in a subclass. The test documents the idea, but does not capture the regression seen in the wild, as explained in a comment.
| * | | | | Allow 'overriding' deferred varAdriaan Moors2016-08-113-0/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Discovered by scala-js's test suite.
| * | | | | Simplify erasure + mixinAdriaan Moors2016-08-112-0/+20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Remove some old, obsolete & untested hacks from ExplicitOuter. Added a test for one of them to show this is now fine. There are a lot of `makeNotPrivate` invocations sprinkled around the codebase. Lets see if we can centralize the ones dealing with trait methods that need implementations in the phase that emits them. For example Fields (accessors for fields/modules) or SuperAccessors.
| * | | | | Uncurry's info transform: non-static module --> methodAdriaan Moors2016-08-111-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We do this during uncurry so we can insert the necessary applications to the empty argument list. Fields is too late. Refchecks is no longer an info transform.
| * | | | | Fields phase synthesizes modulesAdriaan Moors2016-08-111-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | For now, keep the info transform in refchecks. Ultimately, refchecks should only check, not transform trees/infos. Fixes https://github.com/scala/scala-dev/issues/126: the accessor for a module in a trait is correctly marked non-final (it's deferred).
| * | | | | Test EnclosingMethod attribute for classes in lazy valsLukas Rytz2016-08-112-1/+53
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Local and anonymous classes need to have an EnclosingMethod attribute denoting the enclosing class and method. In fact, the enclosing class must always be defined for local and anonymous classes, but the enclosing method may be null (for local / anonymous classes defined in field initializers or local blocks within a class body). The new test here ensures that classes declared within a lazy val initializer block indeed have the enclosing method set to null.
| * | | | | Fields phaseAdriaan Moors2016-08-1173-287/+944
| |/ / / / | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | One step towards teasing apart the mixin phase, making each phase that adds members to traits responsible for mixing in those members into subclasses of said traits. Another design tenet is to not emit symbols or trees only to later remove them. Therefore, we model a val in a trait as its accessor. The underlying field is an implementation detail. It must be mixed into subclasses, but has no business in a trait (an interface). Also trying to reduce tree creation by changing less in subtrees during tree transforms. A lot of nice fixes fall out from this rework: - Correct bridges and more precise generic signatures for mixed in accessors, since they are now created before erasure. - Correct enclosing method attribute for classes nested in trait fields. Trait fields are now created as MethodSymbol (no longer TermSymbol). This symbol shows up in the `originalOwner` chain of a class declared within the field initializer. This promoted the field getter to being the enclosing method of the nested class, which it is not (the EnclosingMethod attribute is a source-level property). - Signature inference is now more similar between vals and defs - No more field for constant-typed vals, or mixed in accessors for subclasses. A constant val can be fully implemented in a trait. TODO: - give same treatment to trait lazy vals (only accessors, no fields) - remove support for presuper vals in traits (they don't have the right init semantics in traits anyway) - lambdalift should emit accessors for captured vals in traits, not a field Assorted notes from the full git history before squashing below. Unit-typed vals: don't suppress field it affects the memory model -- even a write of unit to a field is relevant... unit-typed lazy vals should never receive a field this need was unmasked by test/files/run/t7843-jsr223-service.scala, which no longer printed the output expected from the `0 to 10 foreach` Use getter.referenced to track traitsetter reify's toolbox compiler changes the name of the trait that owns the accessor between fields and constructors (`$` suffix), so that the trait setter cannot be found when doing mkAssign in constructors this could be solved by creating the mkAssign tree immediately during fields anyway, first experiment: use `referenced` now that fields runs closer to the constructors phase (I tried this before and something broke) Infer result type for `val`s, like we do for `def`s The lack of result type inference caused pos/t6780 to fail in the new field encoding for traits, as there is no separate accessor, and method synthesis computes the type signature based on the ValDef tree. This caused a cyclic error in implicit search, because now the implicit val's result type was not inferred from the super member, and inferring it from the RHS would cause implicit search to consider the member in question, so that a cycle is detected and type checking fails... Regardless of the new encoding, we should consistently infer result types for `def`s and `val`s. Removed test/files/run/t4287inferredMethodTypes.scala and test/files/presentation/t4287c, since they were relying on inferring argument types from "overridden" constructors in a test for range positions of default arguments. Constructors don't override, so that was a mis-feature of -Yinfer-argument-types. Had to slightly refactor test/files/presentation/doc, as it was relying on scalac inferring a big intersection type to approximate the anonymous class that's instantiated for `override lazy val analyzer`. Now that we infer `Global` as the expected type based on the overridden val, we make `getComment` private in navigating between good old Skylla and Charybdis. I'm not sure why we need this restriction for anonymous classes though; only structural calls are restricted in the way that we're trying to avoid. The old behavior is maintained nder -Xsource:2.11. Tests: - test/files/{pos,neg}/val_infer.scala - test/files/neg/val_sig_infer_match.scala - test/files/neg/val_sig_infer_struct.scala need NMT when inferring sig for accessor Q: why are we calling valDefSig and not methodSig? A: traits use defs for vals, but still use valDefSig... keep accessor and field info in synch
* | | | | Merge pull request #5260 from szeiger/issue/9068Seth Tisue2016-08-112-3/+5
|\ \ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | SI-9068 Deprecate scala.collection.mutable.Stack
| * | | | | SI-9068 Deprecate scala.collection.mutable.StackStefan Zeiger2016-08-102-3/+5
| |/ / / /
* | | | | Merge pull request #5272 from som-snytt/issue/8829Adriaan Moors2016-08-1113-24/+24
|\ \ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | SI-8829 Defaultly scala -feature -deprecation
| * | | | | SI-8829 Let reporter customize retry messageSom Snytt2016-07-0913-24/+24
| | |_|_|/ | |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | "Re-run with -deprecation" is not always appropriate. REPL gets to customize the message. The API includes the setting and its name, because reflect Settings do not have names. (!)
* | | | | Merge pull request #5262 from lrytz/t8786Adriaan Moors2016-08-117-39/+156
|\ \ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | SI-8786 fix generic signature for @varargs forwarder methods
| * | | | | SI-8786 fix generic signature for @varargs forwarder methodsLukas Rytz2016-08-117-39/+156
| | |_|/ / | |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When generating a varargs forwarder for def foo[T](a: T*) the parameter type of the forwarder needs to be Array[Object]. If we gnerate Array[T] in UnCurry, that would be erased to plain Object, and the method would not be a valid varargs. Unfortunately, setting the parameter type to Array[Object] lead to an invalid generic signature - the generic signature should reflect the real signature. This change adds an attachment to the parameter symbol in the varargs forwarder method and special-cases signature generation. Also cleanes up the code to produce the varargs forwarder. For example, type parameter and parameter symbols in the forwarder's method type were not clones, but the same symbols from the original method were re-used.
* | | | | Merge pull request #5327 from lrytz/2.12.xLukas Rytz2016-08-117-25/+24
|\ \ \ \ \ | |_|_|/ / |/| | | | SI-7187 deprecate eta-expansion of zero-arg method values
| * | | | SI-7187 deprecate eta-expansion of zero-arg method valuesAdriaan Moors2016-08-107-25/+24
| | |_|/ | |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | For backwards compatiblity with 2.11, we already don't adapt a zero-arg method value to a SAM. In 2.13, we won't do any eta-expansion for zero-arg method values, but we should deprecate first.
* | | | Deprecate values that had to be public in older versions...Simon Ochsenreither2016-08-021-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ... so we can make them private later.
* | | | Reduce deprecations and warningsSimon Ochsenreither2016-08-024-5/+5
|/ / /
* | | Merge pull request #5301 from retronym/ticket/SD-167Adriaan Moors2016-07-262-0/+9
|\ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SD-167 Fine tuning constructor pattern translation Fixes scala/scala-dev#167
| * | | SD-167 Fine tuning constructor pattern translationJason Zaugg2016-07-252-0/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Avoid calling NoSymbol.owner when checking whether we're dealing with a case class constructor pattern or a general extractor. Tested manually with the test case in the ticket, no more output is produced under `-Xdev`. - Be more conservative about the conversion to a case class pattern: rather than looking just at the type of the pattern tree, also look at the tree itself to ensure its safe to elide. This change is analagous to SI-4859, which restricted rewrites of case apply calls to case constructors. I've manually tested that case class patterns are still efficiently translated: ``` object Test { def main(args: Array[String]) { Some(1) match { case Some(x) => } } } ``` ``` % qscalac -Xprint:patmat sandbox/test.scala [[syntax trees at end of patmat]] // test.scala package <empty> { object Test extends scala.AnyRef { def <init>(): Test.type = { Test.super.<init>(); () }; def main(args: Array[String]): Unit = { case <synthetic> val x1: Some[Int] = scala.Some.apply[Int](1); case4(){ if (x1.ne(null)) matchEnd3(()) else case5() }; case5(){ matchEnd3(throw new MatchError(x1)) }; matchEnd3(x: Unit){ x } } } } ```
* | | | Merge pull request #5279 from retronym/ticket/SD-183Adriaan Moors2016-07-262-12/+28
|\ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | SD-183 Make refinement classes ineligible as SAMs
| * | | | SD-183 Make refinement classes ineligible as SAMsJason Zaugg2016-07-142-12/+28
| | |_|/ | |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Only non-refinement class types need apply, which is the same restriction that we levy on parent types of a class. ``` scala> class C; class D extends C; type CD = C with D; class E extends CD <console>:11: error: class type required but C with D found class C; class D extends C; type CD = C with D; class E extends CD ^ scala> class C; class D extends C; type DC = D with C; class E extends DC <console>:11: error: class type required but D with C found class C; class D extends C; type DC = D with C; class E extends DC ^ ``` Prior to this change: ``` scala> trait T { def t(a: Any): Any }; trait U; abstract class C extends T defined trait T defined trait U defined class C ```` For indy-based lambdas: ``` scala> val tu: T with U = x => x tu: T with U = $$Lambda$1812/317644782@3c3c4a71 scala> tu: U java.lang.ClassCastException: $$Lambda$1812/317644782 cannot be cast to U ... 30 elided ``` For anon class based lambdas: ``` scala> ((x => x): C with U) <console>:14: error: class type required but C with U found ((x => x): C with U) ^ scala> implicit def anyToCWithU(a: Any): C with U = new C with U { def t(a: Any) = a } warning: there was one feature warning; re-run with -feature for details anyToCWithU: (a: Any)C with U scala> (((x: Any) => x): C with U) // SAM chosen but fails to typecheck the expansion uncurry <console>:17: error: class type required but C with U found (((x: Any) => x): C with U) // SAM chosen but fails to typecheck the expansion uncurry ^ ``` Fixes https://github.com/scala/scala-dev/issues/183 While it is tempting to special case refinement classes with no decls by flattening their parents into the parents of the lambda. But there are some subtle issues at play with lineriazation order, as Martin pointed out when I brought this up before: http://www.scala-lang.org/old/node/6817.html
* | | | Merge pull request #5267 from lrytz/deprecateRemoteAdriaan Moors2016-07-262-0/+4
|\ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | Deprecate @remote